Skip to main content

Comparing Learners’ Affect While Using an Intelligent Tutoring System and a Simulation Problem Solving Game

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2008)

Abstract

We compare the affect associated with an intelligent tutoring environment, Aplusix, and a simulations problem solving game, The Incredible Machine, to determine whether students experience significantly better affect in an educational game than in an ITS. We find that affect was, on the whole, better in Aplusix than it was in The Incredible Machine. Students experienced significantly less boredom and frustration and more flow while using Aplusix. This implies that, while aspects unique to games (e.g. fantasy and competition) may make games more fun, the interactivity and challenge common to both games and ITSs may play a larger role in making both types of systems affectively positive learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alessi, S.M., Trollip, S.R.: Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development, 3rd edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2), 167–207 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Wagner, A.Z.: Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students “Game the System”. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 383–390 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, R.S.J.d., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Xolocotzin, U.: The dynamics of affective transi-tions in simulation problem-solving environments. In: Paiva, A., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 666–677. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bragg, L.: Students’ conflicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning mathematics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal 19(1), 29–44 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, J.S.: New learning environments for the 21st century. The Magazine of Higher Learning 38(5), 18–24 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, J.: A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cordova, D.I., Lepper, M.R.: Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 715–730 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Craig, S.D., Graesser, A.C., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect & learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media 29(3), 241–250 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. D’Mello, S.K., Craig, S.D., Witherspoon, A., McDaniel, B., Graesser, A.: Integrating affect sensors in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Affective Interactions: The Computer in the Affective Loop Workshop. In conjunction with International conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 7–13 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T.: How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30(2), 343–353 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gee, J.P.: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003); Keller, C.: Motivational Design of Instruction. In: Reige-luth, C.(ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of their current status. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson, G.T., Graesser, A.C.: Content Matters: An investigation of feedback categories within an ITS. In: Luckin, R., Koedinger, K., Greer, J. (eds.) Artificial Intelli-gence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keller, J.M.: Strategies for Stimulating the Motivation to Learn. Performance and Instruction Journal 28(8), 1–7 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J., Luchini, K., Michael, B., Norris, C., Solloway, E.: More than just fun and games: Assessing the value of educational video games in the classroom. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI 2004, pp. 1375–1378 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nicaud, J.F., Bouhineau, D., Chaachoua, H.: Mixing microworld and CAS features in building computer systems that help student learn algebra. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 9(2), 169–211 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicaud, J.F., Bouhineau, D., Mezerette, S., Andre, N.: Aplusix II [Computer software] (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning. Paragon House, St. Paul (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R.S.J.d., Lagud, M.C.V., Lim, S.A.L., Macapanpan, A.F., Pascua, S.A.M.S., Santillano, J.Q., Sevilla, L.R.S., Sugay, J.O., Tep, S., Viehland, N.J.B.: Affect and usage choices in simulation problem-solving environments. In: Luckin, R., Koedinger, K.R., Greer, J. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sierra Online, The Incredible Machine: Even More Contraptions [Computer Software] (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schofield, J.W.: Computers and Classroom Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. VanLehn, K.: The behavior of intelligent tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16(3), 227–265 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vogel, J.J., Greenwood-Ericksen, A., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C.A.: Using virtual reality with and without gaming attributes for academic achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39(1), 105–118 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Beverley P. Woolf Esma Aïmeur Roger Nkambou Susanne Lajoie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rodrigo, M.M.T. et al. (2008). Comparing Learners’ Affect While Using an Intelligent Tutoring System and a Simulation Problem Solving Game. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5091. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69130-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69132-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics