Abstract
We compare the affect associated with an intelligent tutoring environment, Aplusix, and a simulations problem solving game, The Incredible Machine, to determine whether students experience significantly better affect in an educational game than in an ITS. We find that affect was, on the whole, better in Aplusix than it was in The Incredible Machine. Students experienced significantly less boredom and frustration and more flow while using Aplusix. This implies that, while aspects unique to games (e.g. fantasy and competition) may make games more fun, the interactivity and challenge common to both games and ITSs may play a larger role in making both types of systems affectively positive learning environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alessi, S.M., Trollip, S.R.: Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development, 3rd edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights (2001)
Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(2), 167–207 (1995)
Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Wagner, A.Z.: Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students “Game the System”. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 383–390 (2004)
Baker, R.S.J.d., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Xolocotzin, U.: The dynamics of affective transi-tions in simulation problem-solving environments. In: Paiva, A., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 666–677. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Bragg, L.: Students’ conflicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning mathematics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal 19(1), 29–44 (2007)
Brown, J.S.: New learning environments for the 21st century. The Magazine of Higher Learning 38(5), 18–24 (2005)
Cohen, J.: A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46 (1960)
Cordova, D.I., Lepper, M.R.: Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 715–730 (1996)
Craig, S.D., Graesser, A.C., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect & learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media 29(3), 241–250 (2004)
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York (1990)
D’Mello, S.K., Craig, S.D., Witherspoon, A., McDaniel, B., Graesser, A.: Integrating affect sensors in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Affective Interactions: The Computer in the Affective Loop Workshop. In conjunction with International conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 7–13 (2005)
Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T.: How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30(2), 343–353 (2004)
Gee, J.P.: What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003); Keller, C.: Motivational Design of Instruction. In: Reige-luth, C.(ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of their current status. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1983)
Jackson, G.T., Graesser, A.C.: Content Matters: An investigation of feedback categories within an ITS. In: Luckin, R., Koedinger, K., Greer, J. (eds.) Artificial Intelli-gence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)
Keller, J.M.: Strategies for Stimulating the Motivation to Learn. Performance and Instruction Journal 28(8), 1–7 (1987)
Lee, J., Luchini, K., Michael, B., Norris, C., Solloway, E.: More than just fun and games: Assessing the value of educational video games in the classroom. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI 2004, pp. 1375–1378 (2004)
Nicaud, J.F., Bouhineau, D., Chaachoua, H.: Mixing microworld and CAS features in building computer systems that help student learn algebra. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 9(2), 169–211 (2004)
Nicaud, J.F., Bouhineau, D., Mezerette, S., Andre, N.: Aplusix II [Computer software] (2007)
Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning. Paragon House, St. Paul (2007)
Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R.S.J.d., Lagud, M.C.V., Lim, S.A.L., Macapanpan, A.F., Pascua, S.A.M.S., Santillano, J.Q., Sevilla, L.R.S., Sugay, J.O., Tep, S., Viehland, N.J.B.: Affect and usage choices in simulation problem-solving environments. In: Luckin, R., Koedinger, K.R., Greer, J. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)
Sierra Online, The Incredible Machine: Even More Contraptions [Computer Software] (2001)
Schofield, J.W.: Computers and Classroom Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
VanLehn, K.: The behavior of intelligent tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16(3), 227–265 (2006)
Vogel, J.J., Greenwood-Ericksen, A., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C.A.: Using virtual reality with and without gaming attributes for academic achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39(1), 105–118 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rodrigo, M.M.T. et al. (2008). Comparing Learners’ Affect While Using an Intelligent Tutoring System and a Simulation Problem Solving Game. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5091. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69130-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69132-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)