Skip to main content

More Accurate Student Modeling through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5091))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Modeling students’ knowledge is a fundamental part of intelligent tutoring systems. One of the most popular methods for estimating students’ knowledge is Corbett and Anderson’s [6] Bayesian Knowledge Tracing model. The model uses four parameters per skill, fit using student performance data, to relate performance to learning. Beck [1] showed that existing methods for determining these parameters are prone to the Identifiability Problem: the same performance data can be fit equally well by different parameters, with different implications on system behavior. Beck offered a solution based on Dirichlet Priors [1], but, we show this solution is vulnerable to a different problem, Model Degeneracy, where parameter values violate the model’s conceptual meaning (such as a student being more likely to get a correct answer if he/she does not know a skill than if he/she does).We offer a new method for instantiating Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, using machine learning to make contextual estimations of the probability that a student has guessed or slipped. This method is no more prone to problems with Identifiability than Beck’s solution, has less Model Degeneracy than competing approaches, and fits student performance data better than prior methods. Thus, it allows for more accurate and reliable student modeling in ITSs that use knowledge tracing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, J.: Difficulties in inferring student knowledge from observations (and why you should care). In: Educational Data Mining: Supplementary Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 21–30 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, J.E., Chang, K.-m.: Identifiability: A Fundamental Problem of Student Modeling. In: Conati, C., McCoy, K., Paliouras, G. (eds.) UM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4511. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R., Junker, B.: Is Over Practice Necessary? Improving Learning Efficiency with the Cognitive Tutor. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, K., Beck, J., Mostow, J., Corbett, A.T.: Does Help Help? A Bayes Net Ap-proach to Modeling Tutor Interventions. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2006 Workshop on Educational Data Mining (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4, 253–278 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferguson, G.A.: Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. McGraw-Hill, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B.J.: The Meaning and Use of the Area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve. Radiology 143, 29–36 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koedinger, K.R.: Toward evidence for instructional design principles: Examples from Cognitive Tutor Math 6. In: Proceedings of PME-NA XXXIII (the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reye, J.: Student Modeling based on Belief Networks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14, 1–33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Beverley P. Woolf Esma Aïmeur Roger Nkambou Susanne Lajoie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A.T., Aleven, V. (2008). More Accurate Student Modeling through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5091. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69130-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69132-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics