Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Usability: Systematische Gestaltung und Optimierung von Benutzerschnittstellen

  • Chapter
Medienpsychologie

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Auszug

Am Mittwoch, 25. März 1992, saß Michael Baltieri wie immer an seinem Schreibtisch bei Salomon Brothers in Manhattan. Das Großraumbüro und der Aktienmarkt waren erfüllt von Hektik: Jeder Händler wollte noch schnell seine Tagesgeschäfte zu Ende bringen, bevor der New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) an der Wall Street genau um 16:00 Uhr schließt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Richter, M und Flückiger, M. D. (2007). Usability Engineering kompakt. Benutzbare Software gezieltentwickeln. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarodnick, F. und Brau, H. (2006). Methoden der Usability Evaluation. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosson, M. B. und Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D. und Beale, R. (2004). Human-computer interaction. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, J. (2000). The humane interface. new directions for designing interactive systems. Amsterdam: Addison-Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Bernard, M. (2002). Examining user expectations for the location of common e-commerce web objects. Verfüg bar unter http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/41/web_object-ecom.htm [1.12.2007]

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, H. und Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design. Defining customer-centered systems. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bias, R. und Mayhew, D. (1994). Cost-justifying usability, New Jersey: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimah, R. B. (2003). FEW is more: Fragebogen zur Evaluation von Webseiten. Eineempirische Untersuchung. Lizen tiatsarbeitam Lehrstuhl für Medienpsychologie der Universität Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. und Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, S. (1998). Set phasers on stun and other true tales of design, technology, and human error. Santa Barbara: Aegean Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (1998). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desurvivre, H. W. (1994). Faster, cheaper! Are usability inspection methods as effective as empirical testing? In J. Nielsen und R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 173–202). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A. (2005). Making sense of content: Eye tracking older, novice users to evaluate an alternative web browser design. In M. Groner, R. Groner, R. Müri, K. Koga, S. Raess und P. Sury (Eds.), Abstracts of the thirteenth European Conference on Eye Movements ECEM13, TM-138 (p. 87). Bern: VISLAB publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN ISO 13407 (1999). Benutzer-orientierte Gestaltung linteraktiver Systeme (ISO 12407: 1999); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 13407: 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIN ENISO 9241-151:2006-08 (2006). Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion-Teil 151: Leitlinien zur Gestaltung von Benutzungsschnittstellen für das World Wide Web (ISO/DIS 9241-151: 2006); Deutsche Fassung prENISO 9241-151: 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, J. S. und Redish, J. C. (1999). Apractical guide to usability testing. Portland: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Früh, W. (1981). Inhaltsanalyse. Konstanz: UVK Medien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R. (2000). Evaluation von Gebrauchsanleitungen. Testverfahren und ihre Anwendung. In: J. Henning und M. Tjarks-Sobhani (Hrsg.), Hochschulschriften (4), Lübeck: Schmidt-Römhild.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, M., Spine, T. M., Whiteside, J. und George, P. (1986). User-derived impact analysis as a tool for usability engineering. In M. Mantel und P. Oberton (Eds.), Proceedings of human factors in computing systems: CHI 86 (pp. 241–246). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. J. und Helmer, O. (1964). Report on a long range forecasting study. RAND Paper p-2982. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandjean, E. (1991). Physiologische Arbeitsgestaltung. Berlin: Ecomed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groner, R. (1978). Hypothesen im Denkprozess Grundlagen einer verallgemeinerten Theorie auf der Basis elementarer Informationsverarbeitung. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groner, R. und Groner, M. (1991). Heuris tische versus algorithmische Orientierung als Dimension des individuellen kognitiven Stils. In K. Grawe, R. Hänni, N. Semmer und F. Tschan (Hrsg.), Über dierichtige Art, Psychologiezu betreiben (S. 315–330). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groner, R. und Groner, M. T. (2000). The issue of control in sensory and perceptual processes; attention selects and modulates the visual input. In W. J. Perrig und A. Grob (Eds.) Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness (pp. 125–136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groner, R, Groner, M. und Bischof, W. F. (1983). Methods ofheuristics. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/TR 16982 (2002–06). Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Usability methods supporting human-centred design.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, B. E. (1995). Why GOMS? Interactions, 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karat, J. (1997). User-centered software evaluation methodologies. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer und P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer-interaction (pp. 689–704). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. (1969). Gestaltpsychologie. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapa, C. (2005). Understanding banner blindness: Using eye tracking to improve web site design. In M. Groner, R. Groner, R. Müri, K. Koga, S. Raess und P. Sury (Eds.), Abstracts of the thirteenth European Conference on Eye Movements ECEM 13, PD-219 (p. 129). Bern: VISLAB publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G.D. (1992). Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 5, 883–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J. J. (1988). Analyzing decision making. Metric conjoint analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, D. J. (1999). the usability engineering lifecycle: A practitioner’s handbook for user interface design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlage und Techniken. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft Corporation (1992). The Windows interface: An application design guide. Redmond: Microsoft Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niebel, B. (1993). Motion and time study. Burr Ridge: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen und R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (2005). Jacob Nielsen on usability and web design. Verfügbar unter http://www.useit.com/alertbox/200 20512.html [1.12.2007]

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. und Tahir, M. (2002). Homepage usability. 50 websites deconstructed. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1999). The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information applicances are the solution. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, G. (1988). Teaching user interface development to software engineers. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society — 32nd Annual Meeting, 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polson, P. G. und Lewis, C. H. (1990). Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human Computer Interaction, 5, 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., und Carey, T. (1999). Human-Computer Interaction. Wokingham: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y. und Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosson, M. B. und Carroll, J. M. (2002). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. (2005). Wirkung von Werbebannern auf die Einstellung. Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Einfluss von Wiederholung und Gestaltung von Werbebannern. Lizentiatsarbeit am Lehrstuhl für Medienpsychologie der Universität Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoddy, G. S. (1926). Learning and stability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 20, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel Online (2005). Teurer Irrtum: Japans Börsenchef tritt wegen Tippfehlers zurück Verfügbar unter http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,391436,00.html [2.12.2007]

    Google Scholar 

  • Spool, J. (2002). Evolution trumps usability guidelines. User interface engineering. Verfügbar unter http://www.uie.com/articles/evolution_trumps_usability [1.12.2007]

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognazzini, B. (1995). Tog on software design. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullis, T. und Wood, L. (2004). How many users are enough for a card sorting study? Paper presented at the Usability Professionals Association Conference. Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • USB 2.0 Specification. (2000). Verfügbar unter http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/. (Webseite des USB Konsortiums) [1.12.2007]

    Google Scholar 

  • Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S. und Righi, C. (2002). User-centered design: an integrated approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P. W. und Carey, T. (2002). A survey of user-centered design practice. Conference on human factors in computing systems, 4, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1921). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Prinzipielle Bemerkungen. Psychologische Forschung, 1, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werthermer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C. und Polson, P. (1994). The cognitive walkthrough: A practitioner’s guide. In J. Nielsen und R. L. Mack (Eds), Usability inspection methods (pp. 105–140). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambarbieri, D. (2005). Eye movement analysis as an evaluation tool in the field of human-computer interaction. In M. Groner, R. Groner, R. Müri, K. Koga, S. Raess und P. Sury (Eds.), Abstracts of the thirteenth European Conference on Eye Movements ECEM 13, TM-136 (p. 86). Bern: VISLAB publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Rudolf Groner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Raess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philipp Sury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pädagogik und Psychologie, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040, Linz, Österreich

    Bernad Batinic  & Markus Appel  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Groner, R., Raess, S., Sury, P. (2008). Usability: Systematische Gestaltung und Optimierung von Benutzerschnittstellen. In: Batinic, B., Appel, M. (eds) Medienpsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46899-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation