Finding a Place for UbiComp in the Home

  • Andy Crabtree
  • Tom Rodden
  • Terry Hemmings
  • Steve Benford
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2864)

Abstract

The movement of design out of the workplace and into the home brings with it the need to develop new analytic concepts to consider how ubiquitous computing might relate to and support everyday activities in domestic settings. In this paper we present a number of concepts derived from ethnographic studies of routine activities and technology uses implicated in the production and consumption of communication in the home. These concepts sensitise design to the importance of the ecology of the domestic space and distributed arrangements of collaboration to communication. They draw attention to the places where communication is accomplished and the routines whereby communication is articulated, thereby highlighting ‘prime sites’ for situating ubiquitous computing in the domestic environment.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, C.: A Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brand, S.: How Buildings Learn. Viking, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brumitt, B., et al.: EasyLiving. In: Thomas, P., Gellersen, H.-W. (eds.) HUC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1927, p. 12. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crabtree, A.: Designing Collaborative Systems: A Practical Guide to Ethnography. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crabtree, A., et al.: Sore legs and naked bottoms. In: Crabtree, A., et al. (eds.) Proc. of Dependability of Computer-based Systems. The Royal Statistical Society, London (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards, K., Grinter, R.: At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) UbiComp 2001. LNCS, vol. 2201, pp. 256–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaver, W., Dunne, A., Pacenti, E.: Design: cultural probes. Interactions 6(1), 21–29 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaver, W.: Designing for ludic aspects of everyday life. ERCIM News, 47 (2001), http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw47/gaver.html
  9. 9.
    Harper, R., Evergeti, V., Hamill, L., Strain, J.: Paper-mail in the Home of the 21st Century. Digital World Research Centre (2000), http://www.surrey.ac.uk/dwrc/papers/okios.pdf
  10. 10.
    Hindus, D.: The importance of homes in technology research. In: Streitz, N.A., Hartkopf, V. (eds.) CoBuild 1999. LNCS, vol. 1670, pp. 199–207. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hindus, D., et al.: Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home. In: Proc. CHI 2001, pp. 325–332. ACM Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Junestrand, S., Keijer, U., Tollmar, K.: Private and public digital domestic spaces. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 54(5), 753–778 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kidd, C.D., et al.: The aware home. In: Streitz, N.A., Hartkopf, V. (eds.) CoBuild 1999. LNCS, vol. 1670, pp. 191–198. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mynatt, E., Essa, I., Rogers, W.: Increasing the opportunities for aging in place. In: Proc. CUU 2000, pp. 65–71. ACM Press, Virginia (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mozer, M.: The neural network house. In: Proc. AAAI Symposium on Intelligent Environments, pp. 110–114. AAAI, California (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Brien, J., Rodden, T.: Interactive systems in domestic environments. In: Proc. DIS 1997, pp. 247–259. ACM Press, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Brien, J., et al.: At home with the technology. ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction 6(3), 282–308 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Philips Design. Visions of the Future (2000), http://www.design.philips.com/vof
  19. 19.
    Rodden, T., Benford, S.: The evolution of buildings and implications for the design of ubiquitous domestic environments. In: Proc. CHI 2003, pp. 9–16. ACM Press, Florida (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sacks, H.: A single instance of a phone-call opening. In: Jefferson, G. (ed.) Lectures on Conversation, Lecture 3, pp. 542–553. Blackwell, Oxford (Spring 1972)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Streitz, N.A., Geißler, J., Holmer, T.: Roomware for cooperative buildings. In: Streitz, N.A., Konomi, S., Burkhardt, H.-J. (eds.) CoBuild 1998. LNCS, vol. 1370, p. 4. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tolmie, P., Pycock, J., Diggins, T., Maclean, A., Karsenty, A.: Unremarkable computing. In: Proc. CHI 2002, pp. 399–406. ACM Press, Minneapolis (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Venkatesh, A.: A conceptualization of household-technology interaction. Advances in Consumer Research 12, 189–194 (1985)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Venkatesh, A.: Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Communications of the ACM 39(12), 47–54 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Venkatesh, A., Nicosia, F.: New technologies for the home. Advances in Consumer Research 24, 522–528 (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Venkatesh, A., Stolzoff, N., Shih, E., Mazumdar, S.: The home of the future. Advances in Consumer Research 28, 88–96 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andy Crabtree
    • 1
  • Tom Rodden
    • 1
  • Terry Hemmings
    • 1
  • Steve Benford
    • 1
  1. 1.The School of Computer Science & ITThe University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations