Skip to main content

Visualizing Trees and Forests

  • Chapter
Handbook of Data Visualization

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks Comp.Statistics ((SHCS))

Abstract

Tree-basedmodels provide an appealing alternative to conventional models formany reasons. They are more readily interpretable, can handle both continuous and categorical covariates, can accommodate data with missing values, provide an implicit variable selection, and model interactionswell. Most frequently used tree-basedmodels are classification, regression, and survival trees. Visualization is important in conjunction with treemodels because in their graphical formthey are easily interpretable even without special knowledge. Interpretation of decision trees displayed as a hierarchy of decision rules is highly intuitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors, Machine Learn 24(2):123–140.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (1999). Random forests – random features, Technical Report TR567, University of California-Berkeley, Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. and Stone, C. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forina, M., Armanino, C., Lanteri, S. and Tiscornia, E. (1983). Classification of olive oils from their fatty acid composition, in Martens, H. and Russwurm, H. (eds), Food Research and Data Analysis, Applied Science, London, pp. 189–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. and Rubinfeld, D. (1978). Hedonic prices and the demand for clean air, J Environ Econ Manage 5:81–102.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mangasarian, O. and Wolberg, W. (1990). Cancer diagnosis via linear programming, SIAM News 23(5):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. (1996). Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Urbanek, S. (2003). Interactive construction and analysis of trees, Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Statistical Meetings, D.P. Mira (CD-ROM).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urbanek, S. (2008). Visualizing Trees and Forests. In: Handbook of Data Visualization. Springer Handbooks Comp.Statistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33037-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics