Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trauma 9/11 und die normative Ordnung der amerikanischen Sicherheitspolitik

  • Chapter
Die Welt nach 9/11

  • 8443 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

US-Regierung und Kongress haben auf die traumatischen Ereignisse des 11. Septembers 2001 (9/11) mit Strategien der Rückversicherung reagiert, die eine Reihe von Paradigmenwechseln in der Innen- und Außenpolitik bewirkten. Anhand der Beispiele veränderter Praktiken und Diskurse in der innerstaatlichen Sicherheits- und der nuklearen Rüstungskontrollpolitik nach 9/11 lässt sich zeigen, dass der Administration von Präsident George W. Bush insbesondere eine Erweiterung der eigenen Handlungsspielräume gelang. Das alles überlagernde neue Paradigma des Counterterrorism führte zu einer Neujustierung der normativen Ordnung der amerikanischen Sicherheitspolitik.

Ich danke Annika E. Poppe und Carsten Rauch für viele hilfreiche Kommentare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aradau, C. & van Munster, R. (2007). Governing Terrorism Through Risk. Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations, 13 (1), 89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, C. & van Munster, R. (2008). Insuring Terrorism, Assuring Subjects, Ensuring Normality: The Politics of Risk After 9/11. Alternatives, 33 (2), 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auchter, T., Büttner, C., Schultz-Venrath, U. & Wirt, H.-J. (Hrsg.) (2003). Der 11. September. Psychoanalytische, psychosoziale und psychohistorische Analysen von Terror und Trauma. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C.P. & du Preez, J.P. (2005).Visions of Fission. The Demise of Nuclear Negative Security Assurances on the Bush Administration's Pentomic Battlefield. Nonproliferation Review, 12 (1), 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braml, J. (2006). Tyranny of the Majority? Die Einschränkung persönlicher Freiheitsrechte nach den Terroranschlägen von New York und Washington. In J. Hils & J. Wilzewski (Hrsg.), Defekte Demokratie – Crusader State? Die Weltpolitik der USA in der Ära Bush (S. 189–233). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, G. (2003). Die Reparatur der Ohnmacht – Zur politischen Psychologie des 11. September. In T. Auchter, C. Büttner, U. Schultz-Venrath & H.-J. Wirt (Hrsg.), Der 11. September. Psychoanalytische, psychosoziale und psychohistorische Analysen von Terror und Trauma (S. 357–379). Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, R.S. (2006). Reform, Reorganization, and the Renaissance of the Managerial Presidency.The Impact of 9/11 on the Executive Establishment.Politics and Policy, 34 (2), 304–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, E.H. & Boaz, D. (2003).CATO Handbook for Congress.Policy Recommendations for the 108th Congress.Washington, D.C.: CATO Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, C. & Kessler, O. (2007). Knowns and Unknowns in the ‚War on Terror‘. Uncertainty and the Political Construction of Danger. Security Dialogue, 38 (4), 411–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J.W. (2004). Worse than Watergate. The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush. New York: Little Brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitelhoff, N. (2006). Überzeugung in der Politik. Grundzüge einer Diskurstheorie internationalen Regierens. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edkins, J. (2002). Forget Trauma? Responses to September 11. International Relations, 16 (2), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, M., Franceschini, G., Müller, H. & Schmidt, H.-J. (2010). Auf dem Weg zu Global Zero? Die neue amerikanische Nuklearpolitik zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. HSFK-Report4/2010, Frankfurt a. M.: HSFK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52 (4), 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, O. (2011, 4. Mai): Law and Terrorism, Vortrag im Rahmen der Veranstaltungsreihe „Reconfiguring American Politics“, Forschungskolleg Humanwissenschaften der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt: Bad Homburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C.A. (2008). A New Paradigm. Shattering Obsolote Thinking on Arms Control and Nonproliferation. Arms Control Today, 38 (9), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C.A. (2007). Debating Disarmament. Interpreting Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Nonproliferation Review, 14 (3), 401–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. & Günther, K. (2011). Die Herausbildung normative Ordnungen. Zur Idee eines interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramms. In R. Forst & K. Günther (Hrsg.), Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven (S. 11–30). Frankfurt a. M., New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GPO (2006). Budget of the United States Government. Fiscal Year 2007. www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy07/index.html. Zugriff: 30. Apr. 2011.

  • Gorman, S. (2002, 21. Dez.). The Ashcroft Doctrine, National Journal, 12/2002, 3712–3719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S. & Chatel, D. (1992). Terror Management and Tolerance. Does Mortality Salience Always Intensify Negative Reactions to Others Who Threaten One's Worldview? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (2), 212–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, M. (2002): Bush and the World. The Need for a New Wilsonianism. Foreign Affairs, 81 (5), 18–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside Terrorism. New York, NY: ColumbiaUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. & Bleiker, R. (2008a): Emotional Reconciliation. Reconstituting Identity and Community after Trauma. European Journal of Social Theory, 11 (3), 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. & Bleiker, R. (2008b): Emotions in the War on Terror. In A.J. Bellamy, R. Bleiker, S.E. Davies & R. Devetak (Hrsg.), Security and the War on Terror (S. 57–69). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2011). Culture, Identity and Hegemony. Continuity and (the Lack of) Change in US Counterterrorism Policy from Bush to Obama. International Politics, 48 (2/3), 390–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, R.L., Wendt, A. & Katzenstein, P.J. (1996). Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security. In P.J. Katzenstein (Hrsg.), The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics (S. 33–75). New York, NY: ColumbiaUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (2009). An Empire, But We Can't Keep It. In W. Zartman (Hrsg.), Imbalance of Power: US Hegemony and International Order (S.37–59). Boulder, CO, London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2005). All Talk, No Action. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 61 (4), 19–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2006). „Do as I say, not as I do“. From Nuclear Non-proliferation to Counter-proliferation. In P.S. Sidhu & R. Thakur (Hrsg.), Arms Control After Iraq. Normative and Operational Challenges (S.57–79). Tokio, New York, NY: United NationsUniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2004). Trust and Terror. In P. DesAutels & M.U. Walker (Hrsg.), Moral Psychology. Feminist Ethics and Social Theory (S. 3–18). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. (2005). The Exercise of National Sovereignty. The Bush Administration's Approach to Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation. Nonproliferation Review, 12 (2), 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, M. & Wolf, R. (2006). National Security State? Terror, Sicherheitsfixierung und die Entwicklung der amerikanischen Demokratie. In J. Hils & J. Wilzewski (Hrsg.), Defekte Demokratie – Crusader State? Die Weltpolitik der USA in der Ära Bush (S. 141–187). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P.J. (Hrsg.) (1996). The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, D.F. (2007). System under Stress. Homeland Security and American Politics. 2. Aufl., Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, E. B. (2002). Unilateral Arms Control? Post-11 September Trends in US Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Approaches. Strategic Assessment, 4(4), www.inss.org.il/publications.php?cat=21&incat=&read=696. Zugriff: 5. Mai 2011.

  • Landau, M.J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., Miller, C.H., Ogilvie, D.M. & Cook, A. (2004). Deliver us from Evil. The Effects of Mortality Salience and Reminders of 9/11 on Support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (9), 1136–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, J.E. & Haddal, C.C. (2009). Homeland Security Department: FY2010 Appropriations. CRS Report for Congress, R40642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M. & Combs, B. (1978). Judged Frequency of Lethal Events. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory, 4/1978, 551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutes, C.D. (2008). Combatting WMD Threats. In S.J. Flanagan & J.A. Schear (Hrsg.), Strategic Challenges. Americas's Global Security Agenda (S. 61–85). Washington D.C.: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, D.M. (2003). A Decade of U.S. Unilateralism? In D.M. Malone & Y.F. Khong (Hrsg.), Unilateralism and U.S. Foreign Policy. International Perspectives (S. 19–38). Boulder, CO, London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, J. (2002). Governmentality, Ontological Security and Ideational Stability. Preliminary Observations on the Manner, Ritual and Logic of a Particular Art of Government. Journal of Political Ideologies, 7 (2), 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. (1999). Security, Identity and Interests. A Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. (2005). Vertrag im Zerfall. HSFK-Report 4/2005, Frankfurt a.M.: HSFK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. (2004). Think Big! Der 11. September und seine Konsequenzen für die Internationalen Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 11 (1), 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. (2003). Amerika schlägt zurück. Die Weltordnung nach dem 11. September. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. & Schörnig, N. (2006). Rüstungsdynamik und Rüstungskontrolle. Eine exemplarische Einführung in die Internationalen Beziehungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. & Sohnius, S. (2006). Intervention und Kernwaffen. Zur neuen Nukleardoktrin der USA. HSFK-Report 1/2006, Frankfurt a.M: HSFK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, R.S. (2010, 22. Sep.). Nine Years After 9/11. Confronting the Terrorist Threat to the U.S. Statement Before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Washington D.C., www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/nine-years-after-9–11-confronting-the-terrorist-threat-to-the-u.s. Zugriff: 30. Apr. 2011.

  • Newman, A. (2004). Arms Control, Proliferation and Terrorism. The Bush Administration's Post-September 11 Security Strategy. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 27 (1), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J.E., Finel, B.I. & Finlay, B.D. (2003). Conclusion. Modifying America's Nonproliferation Policy for an Uncertain Future. In J.E. Nolan, B.I. Finel & B.D. Finlay (Hrsg.), Ultimate Security. Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction (S. 231–242). New York, NY: The Century Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, M.E. (2010). The Choice of Law Against Terrorism. Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 4 (2), 343–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J.E. (2006). Presidential Power and Congressional Acquiescence in the „War“ on Terrorism. A New Constitutional Equilibrium. Politics & Policy, 34 (2), 258–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J.E. (2009). Congressional Acquiescence to Presidentialism in the US „War on Terror.“The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15 (2–3), 147–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, J.E. & Dumbrell, J.W. (2006). Introduction. Politics and Policy in America's „War“ on Terror. Politics & Policy, 34 (2), 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, S. (2001). The Evolution of International Norms. Choice, Learning, Power, and Identity. In William R.T. (Hrsg.): Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics, New York, NY, London: Routledge, 133–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, A. (2008). Addressing Tomorrow's Terrorists. Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 2 (2), 297–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillar, P.R. (2006). Intelligence, Policy, and the War in Iraq. Foreign Affairs, 85 (2), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampton, S. (2001). Terrorism to End Terrorism. PR Watch, 8(4), www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2001Q4/end_terror.html. Zugriff: 21. Apr. 2011.

  • Relyea, H.C. (2003). Organizing for Homeland Security. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33 (3), 602–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshon, J. (2007). The Psychological Origins of Preventive War. In: S.A. Renshon & Peter Suedfeld (Hrsg.), Understanding the Bush Doctrine. Psychology and Strategy in an Age of Terrorism (S. 201–230). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risen, J. & Lichtblau, E. (2005, 16. Dez.). Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts.New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roß, I. (2005). Hijacking of the President? Der Einfluss der Neokonservativen auf die Entscheidung zum Irakkrieg 2003. JFK-Working Paper134. Berlin: JFK-Institut für Nordamerikastudien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, K.G. (2004, 17.-20. März). Securitizing Terror. Ontological Security and the U.S. Response to 9/11. Annual ISA Meeting in Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkesian, S.C., Williams, J.A. & Cimbala, S.J. (2008). US National Security. Policymakers, Processes, and Politics.Boulder, CO, London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P.C. (2001). New Approaches to Nonproliferation. Supplementing or Supplanting the Regime? Nonproliferation Review, 8 (3), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyer, S. (2006). Imperial Presidency Redux? Die institutionelle Machtbalance zwischen Terrorbekämpfung und Präventivkrieg. In J. Hils & J. Wilzewski (Hrsg.), Defekte Demokratie – Crusader State? Die Weltpolitik der USA in der Ära Bush (S. 111–139). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, J. (2003). Organizing for International Counterproliferation. NATO and U.S. Nonproliferation Policy. In J.E. Nolan, B.I. Finel, B.D. Finlay (Hrsg.), Ultimate Security. Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction, New York, NY: The Century Foundation Press, 203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J. (2002/03). Dreaded Risks and the Control of Biological Weapons. International Security, 27 (3), 89–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J., Wiener, J.B. (2006). Precaution Against Terrorism. Journal of Risk Research, 9 (4), 393–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepker, H.F. (2002). The USA PATRIOT Act. Extensions, Fall 2002, www.ou.edu/special/albertctr/extensions/fall2002/Tepker.html. Zugriff: 5. Mai 2011.

  • Tucker, J. (2001). Roundtable on the Implications of the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks for Nonproliferation and Arms Control. Nonproliferation Review, 8 (3), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. National Security Council (2002): The National Security Strategy of the United States of America.Washington D.C. www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/nss/nss_sep2002.pdf. Zugriff: 6. Juni 2011.

  • Waxman, M.C. (2009a). Guantánamo, Habeas Corpus, and Standards of Proof. Viewing the Law Through Multiple Lenses. Columbia Public Law & Legal Theory Working Papers, 9173, New York, NY: ColumbiaLawSchool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, M.C. (2009b). Police and National Security. American Local Law Enforcement and Counterterrorism After 9/11. Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 3 (2), 377–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMD Commission (2006). Weapons of Terror. Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Arms. Stockholm: WMDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R. (2011). Terrorized America? 9/11 and its Impact on US Foreign Policy. In S. Harnisch, C. Frank & H.W. Maull (Hrsg.), Role Theory in International Relations. Approaches and Analyses (S. 194–212). London, New York: Routledge, 194–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfendale, J. (2007). Terrorism, Security, and the Threat of Counterterrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29 (7), 753–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaretsky, E. (2002). Trauma and Dereification. September 11 and the Problem of Ontological Security. Constellations, 9 (1), 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (HSFK), Baseler Str. 27-31, 60329, Frankfurt am Main

    Dipl.-Pol. Marco Fey (Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter)

Authors
  1. Dipl.-Pol. Marco Fey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität zu Köln, Köln

    Thomas Jäger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften ist eine Marke von Springer Fachmedien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fey, M. (2012). Trauma 9/11 und die normative Ordnung der amerikanischen Sicherheitspolitik. In: Jäger, T. (eds) Die Welt nach 9/11. Sonderheft der Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94173-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94173-8_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-18420-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-94173-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation