Skip to main content

Vorurteile, Diskriminierung und Toleranz aus der Sicht der Persönlichkeitspsychologie

  • Chapter
Diskriminierung und Toleranz

Zusammenfassung

Im Unterschied zu den bisher vorgestellten Perspektiven auf die Erklärung von Vorurteilen, Diskriminierung und Toleranz nimmt die Persönlichkeitspsychologie einen anderen Blickwinkel ein: Konsistente und stabile (d.h. über Situationen und Zeit hinweg relativ unveränderte) verhaltensrelevante Unterschiede zwischen Personen stehen im Zentrum der Untersuchung und Erklärung. Diese Perspektive ist eine wichtige Ergänzung sozial-, allgemein- und entwicklungspsychologischer Analysen und eröffnet bedeutsame Fragestellungen für die gezielte Veränderung von Vorurteilen und diskriminierenden oder toleranten Verhaltensweisen. Was bedeutet dies konkret?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Ashton, M. C. (2007). Individual differences and personality. Burlington: Academic Press. [darin Kapitel 11: Religion and Politics]

    Google Scholar 

  • Six, B. (1996). Generalisierte Einstellungen. In M. Amelang (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich C Theorie und Forschung, Serie VIII Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung, Band 3 Temperaments- und Persönlichkeitsunterschiede (S. 1–50). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding rightwing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other „authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L. & Newcomb, T. M. (1991). Political Attitudes over the Life Span. The Bennington Women after Fifty Years. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckström, M. & Björklund, F. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, D. & Hadjar, A. (2005). Alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen? Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede zwischen Autoritarismus, Sozialer Dominanzorientierung und Hierarchischem Selbstinteresse. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 13, 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohrs, J. C. & Asbrock, F. (im Druck). Rightwing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis, I. & Van Hiel, A. (2006). The impact of cognitive styles on authoritarianism based conservatism and racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dualprocess cognitivemotivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L., Martin, N., Heath, A., Schieken, R., Meyer, J., Silberg, J., Neale, M. & Corey, L. (1997). Age changes in the causes of individual differences in conservatism. Behavior Genetics, 27, 121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M. & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or rightwing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frindte, W. & Zachariae, S. (2005). Autoritarismus und soziale Dominanzorientierung als Prädiktoren für fremdenfeindliche und antisemitische Vorurteile. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 13, 83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., Rippl, S., Boehnke, K. & Merkens, H. (1999). The interest in evil: Hierarchic selfinterest and rightwing extremism among East and West German youth. Social Science Research, 28, 162–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitmeyer, W. (2005). Gruppenbezogene Menschenfeindlichkeit: Die theoretische Konzeption und empirische Ergebnisse aus den Jahren 2002, 2003 und 2004. In W. Heitmeyer (Hrsg.), Deutsche Zustände: Folge 3 (S. 13–36). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. K. & Stoker, L. (2001). Political similarity and influence between husbands and wives (Institute of Governmental Studies, Paper WP2001-14). Berkeley: University. Heruntergeladen von http://repositories.cdlib.org/igs/WP2001-14

  • John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I. (2003). Peacebuilding with the hawks: Attitude change of Jewish-Israeli hawks and doves following dialogue encounters with Palestinians. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 701–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, N. G. & Jardine, R. (1986). Eysenck’s contributions to behavior genetics. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Hans Eysenck: Consensus and controversy (pp. 13–47). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCourt, K., Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A. & Keyes, M. (1999). Authoritarianism revisited: genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 985–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, H. & Schmid, C. (2006). The influence of parents and peers on political participation of adolescents in the new states of Germany. In A. Sliwka, M. Hofer & M. Diedrich (Eds.), Citizenship education: Theory – research – practice (pp. 85–96). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1958). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A crossnational comparison. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, R., Grubich, C., Hempel, S., Mergl, S. & Richter, M. (1993). Personality and attitudes towards current political topics. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemann, R. & Spinath, F. (2005). Genetik und Persönlichkeit. In P. Netter & J. Henning (Hrsg.), Biopsychologische Grundlagen der Persönlichkeit (S. 539–628). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagiv, L. & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for outgroup social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. & Levy, S. (2003). Childhood and adult political development. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 60–109). Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A metaanalysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Six, B. (1996). Generalisierte Einstellungen. In M. Amelang (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich C Theorie und Forschung, Serie VIII Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung, Band 3 Temperaments- und Persönlichkeitsunterschiede (S. 1–50). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stößel, K., Kämpfe, N. & Riemann, R. (2006). The Jena Twin Registry and the Jena Twin Study of Social Attitudes (JeTSSA). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 783–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. (1993) The importance of heritability in psychological research: the case of attitudes. Psychological Review, 100, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stößel, K., Cohrs, J., Riemann, R. (2009). Vorurteile, Diskriminierung und Toleranz aus der Sicht der Persönlichkeitspsychologie. In: Beelmann, A., Jonas, K.J. (eds) Diskriminierung und Toleranz. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91621-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91621-7_5

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15732-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91621-7

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics