Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Hypothese des Gegendrucks: Über Einflüsse und Wahlverhalten

  • Chapter
Theorien und Methoden in den Sozialwissenschaften

  • 932 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Menschen, die gesellschaftlichem Gegendruck ausgesetzt sind, verschieben ihre endgültige Wahlentscheidung (Lazarsfeld, Berelson und Gaudet 1968, S. 58).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Allardt, E. and Stein Rokkan 1970: Mass Politics. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allardt, E. and Y. Littunen 1967: Sociologi (Sociology), Almqvist & Wicksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alton, T., J. Scott, C. Flanagan, and S.A. Beck (Hrsg.) 1984: Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B., S. Lazarsfeld and W. McPhee 1966: Voting, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., H.R. Penniman and A. Ranney (Hrsg.) 1981: Democracy in the Polis, AEI Publications, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campell A., S. Converse, W.W. Miller and D. Stokes 1964: The American Voter, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eitzen, D.S. 1972: “Status Inconsistency and the Cross-Pressure Hypothesis”, Midwest Journal of Political Science vol. XVI (May 1972), no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellevik, O. 1973: Endring i Standpunkt til norsk EF-medlemskap: Betydningen av nœrmiljø og politisk parti analysert ved hjelp av en kryss-press modell (Change in point of view on EU Membership: The Importance of Local Environment and Political Party analyzed by a Cross-Pressure Model), Oslo (vorläufige Ausgabe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstrand, U. 1970: “Depoliticization and Political Involvement: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach”, in E. Allardt and S. Rokkan (Hrsg.): Mass Politics, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, S., B. Berelson and H. Gaudet 1968: The People’s Choice, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N.H., S. Verba, and J.R. Petrocik 1976: The Changing American Voter, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinner, F. 1968: “Cross-Pressure”, in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences vol. 3, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (Hrsg.) 1980: Electoral Participation, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Särlvik, B. and I. Crewe 1983: Decade of Realignment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingsten, H. 1963: Political Behaviour, Bedminster Press, Totowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen, H. 1973: “Norway: No to EEC”, Scandinavian Political Studies vol. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen, H. 1981: Valg og politikk (Elections and Politics), NKS-forlaget, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valen, H. and S.A. Pettersen 1995: “Rekordhøy valgdeltagelse” (Record in turnout) in Brussel midt imot. Folkeavstemningen om EU (Against Brussels. The Referendum on the EU), Ad Notam Gyldendal, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. 1960: “The Concepts of Balance, Congruity and Dissonance”, Public Opinion Quarterly 24, S. 280–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Ausgewählte Werke in deutscher Sprache

  • Festinger, L., 1978: Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien, Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B. und H. Gaudet 1969: Wahlen und Wähler, Neuwied, Berlin, Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Lars Svåsand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department für vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Universität Bergen, Norwegen

    Stein Ugelvik Larsen

  2. Technischen Universität Dresden, Deutschland

    Ekkart Zimmermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Westdeutscher Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Svåsand, L. (2003). Die Hypothese des Gegendrucks: Über Einflüsse und Wahlverhalten. In: Larsen, S.U., Zimmermann, E. (eds) Theorien und Methoden in den Sozialwissenschaften. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80451-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80451-8_16

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-13995-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-80451-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation