Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integration durch Neutralität?

Der amerikanische Supreme Court und der Konflikt um die Religion

  • Chapter
Integration durch Verfassung

  • 269 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Wenn man von Integration spricht, muss die Einheit benannt werden, auf die sich der Prozess der Integration bezieht. Die Integrationsleistung von Verfassungen und Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit bezieht sich auf ein verfassungsrechtlich konstituiertes Gemeinwesen, im vorliegenden Falle jenes der USA. Die Frage lautet, inwieweit die Verfassung der USA und die Institution, die die Verfassung verkörpert, der Supreme Court, zur Integration des Gemeinwesens USA beitragen kann und dies in der Praxis auch tun.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adams, William C. (1975): American Public Opinion in the 1960s on Two Church-State Issues. In: Journal of Church and State 17. 477–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Alley, Robert S. (1994): School Prayer: the Court, the Congress, and the First Amendment. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaney, William M./ Beiser, Edward N. (1964): Prayer and Politics: The Impact of Engel and Schempp on the Political Process. In: Journal of Public Law 13, Nr. 2. 475–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkby, Robert H. (1966): The Supreme Court and the Bible Belt: Tennessee Reaction to the „Schempp“ Decision. In: Midwest Journal of Political Science 10, Nr. 3. 304–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (1976): Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp

    Google Scholar 

  • Boles, Donald. E. (1965): The Bible, Religion, and the Public Schools. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Karlyn/ Ladd, Everett Carll (1995): Prayer in Schools. In: American Enterprise 6, Nr. 6. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, Frank/ Goodstein, Laurie (2001): New Bush Office Seeks Closer Ties to Church Groups. In: New York Times vom 29.1.2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierenfield, Bruce J. (1997): „Somebody is Tampering With America’s Soul“: Congress and the School Prayer Debate. In: Congress and Presidency 24, Nr. 2. 167–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolbeare, Kenneth M./ Hammond, Phillip E. (1971): The School Prayer Decisions: From Court Policy to Local Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Drane, Nancy E. (2000): The Supreme Court’s Missed Opportunity: The Constitutionality of Student-Led Graduation Prayer in Light of the Crumbling Wall Between Church and State. In: Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal 31. 497–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Elifson, Kirk/ Hadaway, C. Kirk (1985): Prayer in the Public Schools: When Church and State Collide. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 49. 317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Lee/ Segal, Jeffrey A./ Spaeth, Harold J.; Walker, Thomas G. (19962): The Supreme Court Compendium. Data, Decisions, and Developments. Washington: Congressional Quarterly

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, Ronald B. (1994): That Godless Court? Supreme Court Decisions on Church-State Relationships. Louisville: Knox

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, Paul A. (1961): The Supreme Court of the United States. Cleveland: World Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Poll (1999): („Allowing Daily Prayer to be spoken in the Classroom“)

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, John C./ Guth, James L. (1989): The Missing Link: Political Activists and Support for School Prayer. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 53. 41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haltern, Ulrich R. (1997): Integration als Mythos. Zur Überforderung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. In: Jahrbuch für Öffentliches Recht (N.F.) 45. 31–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachten, William A. (1962): Journalism and the Prayer Decision. In: Columbia Journalism Review 1. 4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Joseph (1962): The Bible, the Constitution and Public Education. In: Tennessee Law Review 29, Nr. 2. 363–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, Dietrich (1999): Die Debatten um die Schulgebetsentscheidungen des amerikanischen Supreme Court. Dresdner Beiträge zur Politischen Theorie und Ideengeschichte Heft 6. TU Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, Dietrich (2002): Die Prinzipien von „original intent“ und „stare decisis“ in der Rechtsprechung des amerikanischen Supreme Court. In: Müller, Stephan/ Schaal, Gary S./ Tiersch, Claudia (Hg.): Dauer durch Wandel. Wien: Böhlau (i.E.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Bob (2000): Federal Appeals Court Upholds School Prayer Ruling. In: Associated Press vom 20.10.2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, Philip B. (1986): The Origins of the Religion Clauses of the Constitution. In: William and Mary Law Review 27. 839–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, Philip B. (1962): The Regents’ Prayer Case: „Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying…“ In: Supreme Court Review. 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, Philip B. (1963): The School Prayer Cases. In: Dallin H. Oaks (ed.) The Wall between Church and State. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. 142–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubach, John Herbert (1969): School Prayers. Congress, the Courts, and the Public. Washington: Public Affairs Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Leonard W. (1986): The Establishment Clause. Religion and the First Amendment. New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Limbach, Jutta (1999): Die Integrationskraft des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. In: Limbach, Jutta (1999): Im Namen des Volkes. Stuttgart: DVA. 148–164

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Michael W. (1990): The Origins and Historical Understandings of Free Exercise of Religion. Harvard Law Review 103, Nr. 7. 1410–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Jane/ Abramson, Jill (1994): Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, William K., Jr. (1967): Prayer in the Public Schools. Law and Attitude Change. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Stuart/ Erikson, Robert (1966/67): Editorial Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions on Church and State. In: Public Opinion Quarterly 30. 647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newland, Chester A. (1964): Press Coverage of the United States Supreme Court. In: Western Political Quarterly 17. 15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NORC General Social Survey 1974 („Proportion Favoring the Required Reading of the Lord’s Prayer or Bible Verses“)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottow, Raimund (1999): Politische Institutionen und der Ort der Tugend im politischen Diskurs der frühen Neuzeit. Dresdner Beiträge zur Politischen Theorie und Ideengeschichte Heft 1. TU Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrie, Gordon (1957): The Aftermath of a Supreme Court Decision. In: Journal of Public Law 6. 455–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Poliak, Louis H. (1963): Foreword: Public Prayers in Public Schools. In: Harvard Law Review 77. 62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Donald R. (1968): The Impact of Judicial Decision-Making: The School Prayer Cases. In: David H. Everson, ed. The Supreme Court as Policy Maker: Three Studies on the Impact of Judicial Decisions Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois UP. 44–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Sky, Theodore (1966): The Establishment Clause, the Congress and the Schools: A Historical Perspective. In: Virginia Law Review 52. 1395–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Rodney K. (1987): Public Prayer and the Constitution. A Case Study in Constitutional Interpretation. Wilmington: Scholarly Resources. 133–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, Frank (1959): Zorach v. Clauson: The Impact of a Supreme Court Decision. In: American Political Science Review 53. 777–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Tom R. (2000): Multiculturalism and the Willingness of Citizens to Defer to Law and to Legal Authorities. In: Law and Social Inquiry 25. 983–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Tom R./ Mitchell, Gregory (1994): Legitimacy and the Empowerment of Discretionary Legal Authority: The United States Supreme Court and Abortion Rights. In: Duke Law Journal 43. 703–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary (1962): Hearings on Prayer in Public Schools and Other Matters. 87th Cong., 2d sess. Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorländer, Hans (1997): Hegemonialer Liberalismus. Politisches Denken und Politische Kultur in den USA 1776–1920. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorländer, Hans (1999): Die Verfassung. Idee und Geschichte. München: Beck

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, H. Frank, Jr. (1968): Survey Research on Judicial Decisions: The Prayer and Bible Reading Cases. In: Western Political Quarterly 21. 189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Dietrich Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

    Hans Vorländer (Professor für Politikwissenschaft, insbes. Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte, und Projektleiter SFB 537 „Institutionalität und Geschichtlichkeit“) (Professor für Politikwissenschaft, insbes. Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte, und Projektleiter SFB 537 „Institutionalität und Geschichtlichkeit“)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herrmann, D. (2002). Integration durch Neutralität?. In: Vorländer, H. (eds) Integration durch Verfassung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80409-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80409-9_15

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-13741-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-80409-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation