Abstract
As refugees are by definition people who have fled conflict, notions of peace and conflict are central to understanding arguments about their inclusion and exclusion. It will be argued that Discursive psychology is well suited for understanding these arguments. Discursive psychological research has illustrated how refugees, and their countries of origin, are constructed in ways that are linked with social and political responses to their situations. Therefore, the extent to which refugees’ countries of origin are presented as dangerous is central to the legitimacy of their claims for asylum. Asylum seekers’ and refugees’ accounts of violence—both in their countries of origin and in the host societies—can be understood as constituting their own identities and justifying their status as ‘real’ refugees. However, opponents of asylum seeking in host societies argue against the presence of refugees through presenting them as a ‘threat’ to peaceful relations in that society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Augoustinos, M., & Reynolds, K. J. (2001). Prejudice, racism, and social psychology. In M. Augoustinos & K. J. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding prejudice, racism and social conflict (pp. 1–23). London: Sage.
Augoustinos, M., Tuffin, K., & Rapley, M. (1999). Genocide or a failure to gel? racism, history and nationalism in Australian talk. Discourse & Society, 10, 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010003004
Bates, D., & Kirkwood, S. (2013). “We Didnae Do Anything Great…” discursive strategies for resisting detention and deportation in Scotland and the North East of England. Refugee Review, 1, 21–31. Retrieved from https://refugeereview.wordpress.com/2013/07/21/deportation/
Dixon, J., & Durrheim, K. (2000). Displacing place-identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164318
Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 295–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3103&4_2
Edwards, D. (2005). Moaning, whinging and laughing: the subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies, 7, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605048765
Every, D., & Augoustinos, M. (2007). Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers. Discourse & Society, 18, 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507077427
Every, D., & Augoustinos, M. (2008). “Taking advantage”or fleeing persecution? Opposing accounts of asylum seeking. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 12, 648–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00386.x
Goodman, S. (2005). Constructing asylum seeking families. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 1, 36–50. Retrieved from http://cadaad.net/files/journal/CADAAD1-1-Goodman-2007-Constructing_Asylum_Seeking_Families.pdf
Goodman, S. (2008). Justifying harsh treatment of asylum seekers through the support of social cohesion. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 6, 110–124. Retrieved from http://www.discourseunit.com/arcp/arcp6/goodman.pdf
Goodman, S. (2010). “It’s not racist to impose limits on immigration”: Constructing the boundaries of racism in the asylum and immigration debate. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis, 4, 1–17.
Goodman, S., & Burke, S. (2010). “Oh you don”t want asylum seekers, oh you’re just racist’: A discursive analysis of discussions about whether it’s racist to oppose asylum seeking. Discourse & Society, 21, 325–340 https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509360743
Goodman, S., & Burke, S. (2011). Discursive deracialization in talk about asylum seeking. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp
Goodman, S., Burke, S., Liebling, H., & Zasada, D. (2015). “I can’t go back because if I go back I would die”: How asylum seekers manage talk about returning home by highlighting the importance of safety. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp
Goodman, S., & Narang, A. (under review). “Sad day for the UK”: The linking of debates about settling refugee children in the UK with Brexit.
Goodman, S., Sirriyeh, A., & McMahon, S. (2017). The evolving (re)categorisations of refugees throughout the “refugee/migrant crisis”. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2302
Goodman, S., & Speer, S. A. (2007). Category use in the construction of asylum seekers. Critical Discourse Studies, 4, 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464832
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kassar, H., & Dourgnon, P. (2014). The big crossing: Illegal boat migrants in the Mediterranean. European Journal of Public Health, 24(Suppl. 1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku099
Kirkwood, S. (2017). The humanisation of refugees: a discourse analysis of UK parliamentary debates on the European refugee “crisis.”. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2298
Kirkwood, S., Goodman, S., McVittie, C., & McKinlay, A. (2015). The language of asylum: Refugees and discourse. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kirkwood, S., Liu, J. H., & Weatherall, A. (2005). Challenging the standard story of indigenous rights in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 493–505.
Kirkwood, S., McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2013a). The mutually constitutive relationship between place and identity: The role of place-identity in discourse on asylum seekers and refugees. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp
Kirkwood, S., McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2013b). “They”re more than animals’: Refugees’ accounts of racially motivated violence. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12007
Kirkwood, S., & McNeill, F. (2015). Integration and reintegration: Comparing pathways to citizenship through asylum and criminal justice. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 15, 511–526. Retrieved from http://crj.sagepub.com/content/15/5/511
Kushner, T. (2006). Remembering refugees: Then and now. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ladegaard, H. J. (2014). Crying as communication in domestic helper narratives: Towards a social psychology of crying in discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 579–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14538823
Leudar, I., Hayes, J., Nekvapil, J., & Turner Baker, J. (2008). Hostility themes in media, community and refugee narratives. Discourse & Society, 19, 187–221 https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507085952
Long, K. (2013). When refugees stopped being migrants: Movement, labour and humanitarian protection. Migration Studies, 1, 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mns001
Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). ‘A phantom menace and the new apartheid’: The social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society, 14, 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014004002
Malloch, M. S., & Stanley, E. (2005). The detention of asylum seekers in the UK: Representing risk, managing the dangerous. Punishment & Society, 7, 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474505048133
Mehan, H. (1997). The discourse of the illegal immigration debate: A case study in the politics of representation. Discourse & Society, 8, 249–270.
Mulvey, G. (2010). When policy creates politics: The problematizing of immigration and the consequences for refugee integration in the UK. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23, 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq045
Nightingale, A., & Goodman, S. (2016). Building the barricade: Public and media debates of the refugee crisis. The Psychologist Retrieved from https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/migration-crisis-psychological-perspectives
O’Nions, H. (2010). What lies beneath: Exploring links between asylum policy and hate crime in the UK. Liverpool Law Review, 31, 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-010-9080-y
Parker, S., Naper, A., & Goodman, S. (2018). How a photograph of a drowned refugee child turned a migrant crisis into a refugee crisis: A comparative discourse analysis. For(E)Dialogue, 2(1), 12–28.
Perkowski, N. (2016, March). Deaths, interventions, humanitarianism and human rights in the Mediterranean “migration crisis.”. Mediterranean Politics, 9395, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2016.1145827
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8
Spicer, N. (2008). Places of exclusion and inclusion: Asylum-seeker and refugee experiences of neighbourhoods in the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830701880350
Spijkerboer, T. (2007). The human costs of border control. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1163/138836407X179337
Stewart, E., & Mulvey, G. (2014). Seeking safety beyond refuge: The impact of immigration and citizenship policy upon refugees in the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40, 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.836960
UNHCR. (2010). Convention and protocol relating to the status of refugees. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/uk/3b66c2aa10
Van Der Valk, I. (2003). Right-wing parliamentary discourse on immigration in France. Discourse & Society, 14, 309–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030143004
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Political discourse and racism: Describing others in Western parliaments. In S. H. Riggins (Ed.), Language and politics of exclusion (pp. 31–64). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961773
Verkuyten, M. (2005). Accounting for ethnic discrimination: A discursive study among minority and majority group members. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04273037
Zetter, R. (2007). More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20, 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirkwood, S., Goodman, S. (2018). Discursive Psychological Research on Refugees. In: Gibson, S. (eds) Discourse, Peace, and Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99093-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99094-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)