Skip to main content

Robotic Total Gastrectomy with Lymphadenectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • 1321 Accesses

Abstract

Robotic total gastrectomy is a safe, feasible, and oncologically sound surgical option for the treatment of gastric cancer located in the proximal portion of the stomach (cardia and proximal body) with or without involvement of the esophagogastric junction. The robotic approach provides patients with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery over traditional open operations, including smaller incisions, less blood loss, decreased pain, early recovery of gastrointestinal function, and shorter hospital stay. For the surgeon, the robotic technology offers improved operative visualization, increased dexterity and precision of instrumentation, and steady control of the camera during key steps in the procedure over conventional laparoscopy. In this chapter, we present a brief review and detailed description of the major steps in robotic total gastrectomy procedure with a modified D2 lymphadenectomy involving gastric resection; clearance of lymph node stations #1, #2, #3, #4sb/d, #5, #6, #7, #8a, #9, #11p, #11d, and 12a minus the splenic hilar dissection (#10); and intracorporeal esophagojejunal anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Ikeda Y, Takahashi I, Abe R, Koga F, Gotoh N, Konishi K, Maehara S, Sugimachi K. Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(8):1187–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg (Chicago, IL: 1960). 2003;138(7):777–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.7.777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tokunaga M, Makuuchi R, Miki Y, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Late phase II study of robot-assisted gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3362–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4613-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH, Inaba K, Obama K, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Arch Surg (Chicago, IL: 1960). 2011;146(9):1086–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen K, Pan Y, Zhang B, Maher H, Wang XF, Cai XJ. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2017;17(1):93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0290-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim KM, An JY, Kim HI, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH. Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(12):1681–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8924.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim HI, Park MS, Song KJ, Woo Y, Hyung WJ. Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol. 2014;40(10):1346–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, Chen JH, Lo SS, Li AF, Chiou SH, Wu CW, Shyr YM. Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e111499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bellochi R, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Di Zitti L, Casciola L. Robot-assisted laparoscopic total and partial gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(12):2753–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0129-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(6):1204–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Mazzocchi P, Lucandri G, Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Sovernigo G. Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. J Surg Res. 2011;166(2):e113–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Caruso S, Patriti A, Marrelli D, Ceccarelli G, Ceribelli C, Roviello F, Casciola L. Open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS. 2011;7(4):452–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Isogaki J, Haruta S, Man IM, Suda K, Kawamura Y, Yoshimura F, Kawabata T, Inaba K, Ishikawa K, Ishida Y, Taniguchi K, Sato S, Kanaya S, Uyama I. Robot-assisted surgery for gastric cancer: experience at our institute. Pathobiol J Immunopathol Mol Cell Biol. 2011;78(6):328–33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoon HM, Kim YW, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Eom BW, Park JY, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, Cho SJ, Rho JY. Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1377–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2043-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang KH, Lan YT, Fang WL, Chen JH, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, Li AF, Chiou SH, Wu CW. Initial experience of robotic gastrectomy and comparison with open and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2012;16(7):1303–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1874-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang BH, Xuan Y, Hur H, Ahn CW, Cho YK, Han SU. Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: the learning curve of robotic surgery. J Gastric Cancer. 2012;12(3):156–63. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2012.12.3.156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Chen P, Zhao Y, Pan HF, Li JS. Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(38):6427–37. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i38.6427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ, Cho SI, Jang YJ, Kim DH, Kim JH, Park SH, Mok YJ, Park SS. Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(4):1258–65. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2679-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Junfeng Z, Yan S, Bo T, Yingxue H, Dongzhu Z, Yongliang Z, Feng Q, Peiwu Y. Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(6):1779–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3385-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen W, Xi H, Wei B, Cui J, Bian S, Zhang K, Wang N, Huang X, Chen L. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):574–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4241-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, Ryu KW, Park JM, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, Song KY, Oh SJ, Kong SH, Suh BJ, Yang DH, Ha TK, Kim YN, Hyung WJ. Multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):103–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(9):2606–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3511-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Parisi A, Ricci F, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Gemini A, Grassi V, Corsi A, Renzi C, De Santis F, Petrina A, Pironi D, D’Andrea V, Santoro A, Desiderio J. Robotic total gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis: a novel approach adopting the double-loop reconstruction method. Medicine. 2015;94(49):e1922. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000001922.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang ZW, Liu J, Wang G, Zhao K, Zhang S, Li N, Li JS. Esophagojejunostomy reconstruction using a robot-sewing technique during totally robotic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2015;62(138):323–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haverkamp L, Weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC, van der Tweel I, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5):1509–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2661-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schafer M, Mariette C, Braga M, Carli F, Demartines N, Griffin SM, Lassen K. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014;101(10):1209–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9582.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamada T, Hayashi T, Aoyama T, Shirai J, Fujikawa H, Cho H, Yoshikawa T, Rino Y, Masuda M, Taniguchi H, Fukushima R, Tsuburaya A. Feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery in gastric surgery: a retrospective study. BMC Surg. 2014;14:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sugisawa N, Tokunaga M, Makuuchi R, Miki Y, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. A phase II study of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Japanese Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2016;19(3):961–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0528-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pedziwiatr M, Matlok M, Kisialeuski M, Migaczewski M, Major P, Winiarski M, Budzynski P, Zub-Pokrowiecka A, Budzynski A. Short hospital stays after laparoscopic gastric surgery under an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway: experience at a single center. Eur Surg ACA Acta Chirurgica Austriaca. 2014;46:128–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-014-0264-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanghee Woo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Woo, Y., Funston, J.R. (2019). Robotic Total Gastrectomy with Lymphadenectomy. In: Tsuda, S., Kudsi, O. (eds) Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96866-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96865-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96866-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics