Creating a Digital Consulting Solution for Project Management Assessments at Dr. Kuhl Unternehmensberatung: Development and Initial Demonstration of a Fully Automated Asset-Based Consulting Approach

Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


  1. (a)

    Situation faced: Consulting provider DKUB GmbH & Co. KG was looking for options to achieve a positive marketing effect with only moderate effort, to raise the profile of the company through innovative consulting services, and to supplement the existing portfolio with digital services, which represent a “door opener” for the classical consulting business. Due to a personal contact between the first two authors of this contribution, the idea of a joint project emerged. It was decided to develop a digital assessment tool. The chosen pilot application area was project management assessment, as project management issues account for the core of DKUB business.

  2. (b)

    Action taken: Since a software system should be created, a design-science (DS) approach was employed. Within design and development, a prototype-oriented process model was used. The project took place without a particular client. Instead, the basis was a jointly developed business concept. Furthermore, a study of Nissen et al. (2017) on quality requirements for virtual consulting services and general features of advisory consulting were considered. The process within the web-based system should reproduce an expert report by gathering data from the client company and linking these with digitally stored expert knowledge to produce a well-founded assessment on the given subject.

  3. (c)

    Results achieved: The assessment is today available to clients on the initial website of the consulting firm via an online shop. After all participants (which might have different roles in the respective project) have successfully taken part in a survey related, the client can call up an expert report. As a result, he or she receives an approximate overview on the status of project management in this particular project. Moreover, recommendations for action to improve the situation are given. Currently, the system is being evaluated for use in a multinational company to assist in continuously monitoring internal projects.

  4. (d)

    Lessons learned: It is possible to create a flexible architecture for virtual assessments on in principle any conceivable subject. Whether virtualization is the right approach for a specific client or project should be clarified based on appropriate criteria, such as the ones proposed by Nissen and Seifert (2017a). The early integration of clients into design and development of digital consulting products is important to economic success. Consulting providers should get involved early and build up experience and knowledge in virtualizing own services without expecting immediate breakthroughs. We estimate that virtual consulting will not generally replace conventional on-site consulting, but rather supplement it.



Project Management Assessment Consulting Solutions Expert Report Consultancy Advice Virtual Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Balzert H, Balzert H, Koschke R, Lämmel U, Liggesmeyer P, Quante J (2009) Lehrbuch der Softwaretechnik: Basiskonzepte und Requirements Engineering, 3rd edn. SpektrumGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamberger I, Wrona T (2012) Konzeptionen der strategischen Unternehmensberatung. In: Wrona T (ed) Strategische Unternehmensberatung, 6th edn. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry DK (2013) Web services, service-oriented architectures, and cloud computing, 2nd edn. Elsevier, WalthamGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunse C, von Knethen A (2008) Vorgehensmodelle kompakt. Spektrum, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen CM, Wang D, van Bever D (2013) Consulting on the cusp of disruption. Harv Bus Rev 91(10):106–114Google Scholar
  6. Deelmann T (2012) Organisations- und Prozessberatung. In: Nissen V, Klauk B (eds) Studienführer Consulting. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  7. Greff T, Werth D (2015) Auf dem Weg zur digitalen Unternehmensberatung. IM+io – Magazin für Innovation, Organisation und Management. IMC, Saarbücken, pp 30–34Google Scholar
  8. Hevner A, Chatterjee S (2010) Design science research in information systems – theory and practice. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuhrmann M (2012) Prototyping. In: Gronau N et al (eds) Enzyklopädie der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 9th edn. GITO, Berlin. Accessed 14 Dez 2016
  11. Müllerleile T, Nissen V (2014) When processes alienate customers: towards a theory of process acceptance. In: Nonopoulos A, Schmidt W (eds) Proceedings of S-BPM One (LNBIP). Springer, Berlin, pp 171–180Google Scholar
  12. Müllerleile T, Ritter S, Englisch L, Nissen V, Joenssen D (2015) The influence of process acceptance on BPM: an empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 I.E. 17th conference on business informatics (CBI 2015). IEEE, Piscataway, pp 125–132Google Scholar
  13. Namiot D, Sneps-Sneppe M (2014) On micro-services architecture. Int J Open Inf Technol 2(9):24–27Google Scholar
  14. Nissen V, Seifert H (2016) Virtualisierung in der Unternehmensberatung. Eine Studie im deutschen Beratungsmarkt. BDU e.V., BonnGoogle Scholar
  15. Nissen V, Seifert H (2017a) Evaluating the virtualization potential of consulting services. In: Nissen V (ed) Digital transformation of the consulting industry – extending the traditional delivery model. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Nissen V, Seifert H (2017b) Digital transformation in business consulting – status quo in Germany. In: Nissen V (ed) Digital transformation of the consulting industry – extending the traditional delivery model. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Nissen V, von Rennenkampff A (2017) Measuring the agility of the IT application systems landscape. In: Leimeister JM, Brenner W (eds) Proceedings Wirtschaftsinformatik 2017, St. Gallen (AISeLibrary)Google Scholar
  18. Nissen V, Seifert H, Blumenstein M (2015) Virtualisierung von Beratungsleistungen: Qualitätsanforderungen, Chancen und Risiken der digitalen Transformation in der Unternehmensberatung aus der Klientenperspektive. In: Deelmann T, Ockel DM (eds) Handbuch der Unternehmensberatung, KZ. 7311, 25th edn. Erich Schmidt Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Nissen V, Müllerleile T, Kazakowa E, Lezina T (2016) Analyzing process acceptance with IT-enabled experimental research. Vestn Econ 3:109–129Google Scholar
  20. Nissen V, Seifert H, Blumenstein M (2017) Chances, risks and quality criteria of virtual consulting. In: Nissen V (ed) digital transformation of the consulting industry – extending the traditional delivery model. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. Nissen V, Kuhl J, Kräft H, Seifert H, Reiter J, Eidmann J (2018) ProMAT – a project management assessment tool for virtual consulting. In: Nissen V (ed) Digital transformation of the consulting industry. Extending the traditional delivery model. Springer, Cham, pp 351–369Google Scholar
  22. Overby E (2008) Process virtualization theory and the impact of information technology. Org Sci 19(2):277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Overby E (2012) Migrating processes from physical to virtual environments: process virtualization theory. In: Dwivedi YK, Wade MR, Schneberger SL (eds) Information systems theory. Explaining and predicting our digital society. Springer, New York, pp 107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007/2008) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manage Inf Syst 24(3):45–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seifert H (2018) Virtualisierung von Beratungsleistungen: Grundlagen der digitalen Transformation in der Unternehmensberatung. PhD Dissertation. Ilmedia, Ilmenau (to appear)Google Scholar
  26. Seifert H, Nissen V (2016) Virtualisierung von Beratungsleistungen: Stand der Forschung zur digitalen Transformation in der Unternehmensberatung und weiterer Forschungsbedarf. In: Nissen V, Stelzer D, Straßburger S, Fischer D (eds) Proceedings of MKWI2016. Ilmedia, Ilmenau, pp 1031–1040Google Scholar
  27. Walger G (1995) Idealtypen der Unternehmensberatung. In: Walger G (ed) Formen der Unternehmensberatung: Systemische Unternehmensberatung, Organisationsabwicklung, Expertenberatung und gutachterliche Beratungstätigkeit in Theorie und Praxis. Otto Schmidt, Cologne, pp 1–18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Technology IlmenauIlmenauGermany
  2. 2.Dr. Kuhl Unternehmensberatung GmbH & Co. KGHardegsenGermany

Personalised recommendations