Skip to main content

Monitoring of Machining in the Context of Industry 4.0 – Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2018 (ISPR 2018)

Abstract

The paper presents the algorithm for the construction of a cutting process monitoring system for selected methods of measurement data flow in order to analyze them as a part of the Industry 4.0 idea. The effectiveness of the cutting process information flow was compared directly in the machine tool area (factory zone) and outside of it, e.g. in the office zone. A stand for monitoring of physical phenomena in the cutting zone of formation and flow of chips with the usage of a piezoelectric dynamometer, thermos-vision and quick-cage cameras was presented. The results of the analysis aimed at determining the limitations of the application of the presented measuring techniques in the concept of the idea of Industry 4.0 were presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brecher C, Ozdemir D, Brockmann M (2017) Introduction to integrative production technology. Prod Eng Res Dev 11(2):93–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y, Ma HS, Yang JH, Wang KS (2017) Industry 4.0: a way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Adv Manuf 5(4):311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Z, Wang Y, Wang KS (2017) Intelligent predictive maintenance for fault diagnosis and prognosis in machine centers: Industry 4.0 scenario. Adv Manuf 5(4):377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grzesik W (2017) Advanced machining processes of metallic materials: theory, modelling, and applications, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam, pp 1–578

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Melnyk SA, Flynn BB, Awaysheh A (2017) The best of times and the worst of times: empirical operations and supply chain management research. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2):164–192

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kusiak A (2017) Smart manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2):508–517

    Google Scholar 

  7. Strandhagen JW, Alfnes E, Strandhagen JO, Vallandingham LR (2017) The fit of Industry 4.0 applications in manufacturing logistics: a multiple case study. Adv Manuf 5(4):344–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siddhpura A, Paurobally R (2013) A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1–4):371–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moeuf A, Pellerin R, Lamouri S, Tamayo-Giraldo S, Barbaray R (2018) The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. Int J Prod Res 56(3):1118–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu X (2017) Machine Tool 4.0 for the new era of manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5–8):1893–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bombinski S, Blazejak K, Nejman M, Jemielniak K (2016) Sensor signal segmentation for tool condition monitoring. Procedia CIRP 46:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou YQ, Xue W (2018) Review of tool condition monitoring methods in milling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5–8):2509–2523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gillich EV, Mocan M, Mituletu IC, Korka ZI (2017) Process monitoring in precision machining using optical sensors. Rom J Acoust Vibr 14(1):50–53

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kongchuenjai J, Prombanpong S (2017) An integer programming approach for process planning for mixed-model parts manufacturing on a CNC machining center. Adv Prod Eng Manag 12(3):274–284

    Google Scholar 

  15. Malapelle F, Dall’Alba D, Fontana DD, Dall’Alba I, Fiorini P, Muradore R (2017) Cost effective quality assessment in industrial parts manufacturing via optical acquisition. Procedia Manuf 11:1207–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abellan-Nebot JV, Subiron FR (2010) A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47(1–4):237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazak (2018). https://www.mazakeu.pl/

  18. DMG Mori (2018). https://en.dmgmori.com/

  19. Li L (2017) China’s manufacturing locus in 2015: with a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025”and “Industry 4.0”. Technol Forecast Soc Change. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028

  20. Wang L (2016) Comparative research on German “Industry 4.0” and “Made in China 2025”. In: 2nd International conference on humanities and social science research, Beijing, pp 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cwikla G (2014) Methods of manufacturing data acquisition for production management - a review. Mod Technol Ind Eng 837:618–623

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liang QK, Zhang D, Wu WN, Zou KL (2016) Methods and research for multi-component cutting force sensing devices and approaches in machining. Sensors, 16(11):1926

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wojciech Zębala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zębala, W., Struzikiewicz, G., Franczyk, E. (2019). Monitoring of Machining in the Context of Industry 4.0 – Case Study. In: Durakbasa, N., Gencyilmaz, M. (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research 2018. ISPR 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92267-6_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92267-6_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92266-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92267-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics