Skip to main content

Advanced Discretization Methods for Contact Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contact Modeling for Solids and Particles

Part of the book series: CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences ((CISM,volume 585))

Abstract

Modeling of contact problems is essential for many problems in engineering in order to predict the behaviour and response of various systems. One can think of pile driving, complex bearings, connections in Civil Engineering, of vehicle road interaction, machines and forming processes in Mechanical Engineering and of MEMS and electrical circuits in Electrical Engineering. All these systems need predictions of the behaviour, durability and efficiency. Hence models are needed that have to be solved by numerical methods due to their complexity. This contribution is aimed at modeling of contact in solid mechanics. Due to the necessity to use numerical methods for the solution of most contact applications this paper will focus mainly on numerical simulation models. Here especially new methodologies are considered that are non-standard and open the possibility for more general application ranges when compared to conventional approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here we use the standard relations \(\mathbf a_\alpha ^2 \cdot \mathbf a^{2\beta } = \delta _\alpha ^\beta \) and \(\mathbf A_\alpha ^2 \cdot \mathbf A^{2\beta } = \delta _\alpha ^\beta \). Furthermore \((\,\,)_{,\alpha }\) denotes differentiation with respect to the convective coordinate \(\xi ^\alpha \).

  2. 2.

    For the analysis of small deformation problems the kinematical relation (1) can be linearized which yields

    $$\begin{aligned} \, \Delta {g}_{N+} \ = \ [\, {\mathbf u}^1 - \hat{\mathbf u}^2(\bar{\varvec{\xi } }) \, ] \cdot \bar{\mathbf N}^2 + g_0\,. \qquad \qquad {(4)} \end{aligned}$$

    \(\mathbf u^\gamma \) represents the displacement field which is introduced in the kinematically linear case to connect the current and the reference configuration via: \(\mathbf x^\gamma = \mathbf X^\gamma + \mathbf u^\gamma \). The variable \(g_0\) denotes the initial gap between the two bodies which is given by \(g_0 = [\mathbf X^1 - \hat{\mathbf X}^2 (\bar{\varvec{\xi }})] \cdot \overline{\mathbf N}^2\) and the normal \(\bar{\mathbf N}^2=(\bar{\mathbf A}^2_1 \times \bar{\mathbf A}^2_2) \,/\, \Vert \bar{\mathbf A}^2_1 \times \bar{\mathbf A}^2_2 \Vert \) is related to the reference configuration.

  3. 3.

    Note that this simple and efficient computation of the virtual ansatz space is only valid for linear interpolations. For quadratic interpolations one has to use the weak form (10).

  4. 4.

    Since the parameters \(a_i\) describing the projection never enter the formulation explicitly the name virtual elements was introduced.

  5. 5.

    In general the virtual element method leads to stiffness matrices that have the same nodal degrees of freedom as finite elements. Thus VEM fits in the standard FEM framework and hence the VEM can easily be combined with standard finite elements. This can be additionally explored to create a node-to-node contact approach for contact situations with non-matching meshes that is very simple to formulate.

  6. 6.

    For large sliding, one has to start this update algorithm at every incremental step of the Newton procedure in order to obtain the current local contact connections.

  7. 7.

    This interpolation is the same as in (34) and thus consistent with the VEM formulation.

  8. 8.

    The same constitutive relation is used for the stabilization term (45), however with different Lame constants.

  9. 9.

    In case of friction two additional different structural tensors have to be defined that are associated with the tangents at the deformed surface of bodies \({B}^\alpha \), e.g, \(\varvec{M}_1^\alpha = \varvec{\varphi }^\alpha _{,1}\otimes \varvec{\varphi }^\alpha _{,1}\) and \(\varvec{M}_2^\alpha = \varvec{\varphi }^\alpha _{,2}\otimes \varvec{\varphi }^\alpha _{,2}\) are defined.

  10. 10.

    Note that in case of \(\omega _{min}\rightarrow 0\) the third medium approaches a two dimensional contact interface. Hence the eigenvector \(\varvec{e}_{min}\) will be equivalent to the normal vector \( \varvec{n}\) of the contact interface which means that the new formulation converges to a classical contact setting for \(\omega _{min}\rightarrow 0\).

References

  • Beirão da Veiga L., Brezzi F., Cangiani A., Manzini G., Marini L. and Russo A. Basic principles of virtual element methods. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 23(01):199–214 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beirão Da Veiga L., Brezzi F. and Marini L. Virtual Elements for linear elasticity problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 51(2):794–812 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beirão da Veiga L., Brezzi F., Marini L.D. and Russo A. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Virtual Element Method. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 24(08):1541–1573 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beirão Da Veiga L., Lovadina C. and Mora D. A Virtual Element Method for elastic and inelastic problems on polytope meshes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 295:327–346 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chi H., Beirão da Veiga L. and Paulino G. Some basic formulations of the virtual element method (VEM) for finite deformations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 318:148–192 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell J.A., Hughes T.J.R. and Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric Analysis. Wiley (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitri R., De Lorenzis L., Scott M., Wriggers P., Taylor R. and Zavarise G. Isogeometric large deformation frictionless contact using t-splines. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 269:394–414 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • de Lorenzis L., Temizer I., Wriggers P. and Zavarise G. A large deformation frictional contact formulation using NURBS-based isogeometric analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 87:1278–1300 (2011).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • de Lorenzis L., Wriggers P. and Zavarise G. Isogeometric analysis of 3d large deformation contact problems with the augmented lagrangian formulation. Computational Mechanics, 49:1–20 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eterovic A.L. and Bathe K.J. An interface interpolation scheme for quadratic convergence in the finite element analysis of contact problems. In Computational Methods in Nonlinear Mechanics, pages 703–715. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer K.A. and Wriggers P. Frictionless 2d contact formulations for finite deformations based on the mortar method. Computational Mechanics, 36:226–244 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer K.A. and Wriggers P. Mortar based frictional contact formulation for higher order interpolations using the moving friction cone. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 2006:5020–5036 (2006).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Franke D., Düster A., Nübel V. and Rank E. A comparison of the h-, p-, hp-, and rp-version of the FEM for the solution of the 2D Hertzian contact problem. Computational Mechanics, 45:513–522 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gain A.L., Talischi C. and Paulino G.H. On the Virtual Element Method for three-dimensional linear elasticity problems on arbitrary polyhedral meshes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 282:132–160 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann S., Oliver J., Weyler R., Cante J. and Hernndez J. A contact domain method for large deformation frictional contact problems. part 2: Numerical aspects. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198:2607–2631 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hesch C. and Betsch P. A mortar method for energy-momentum conserving schemes in frictionless dynamic contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 77:1468–1500 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hüeber S. and Wohlmuth B.I. Thermo-mechanical contact problems on non-matching meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 198:1338–1350 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes T.J.R., Reali A. and Sangalli G. Efficient quadrature for NURBS-based isogeometric analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 199:301–313 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson K.L. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krstulovic-Opara L., Wriggers P. and Korelc J. A \({C}^1\)-continuous formulation for 3d finite deformation frictional contact. Computational Mechanics, 29:27–42 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Krysl P. Mean-strain eight-node hexahedron with optimized energy-sampling stabilization for large-strain deformation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 103:650–670 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Labra C., Rojek J., Onate E. and Zarate F. Advances in discrete element modelling of underground excavations. Acta Geotechnica, 3:317–322 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen T.A. Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, New York, Heidelberg (2002).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver J., Hartmann S., Cante J., Weyler R. and Hernndez J. A contact domain method for large deformation frictional contact problems. part 1: Theoretical basis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198:2591–2606 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Onate E., Idelsohn S.R., Celigueta M.A. and Rossi R. Advances in the particle finite element method for the analysis of fluid-multibody interaction and bed erosion in free surface flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197:1777–1800 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan V. and Laursen T. A framework for development of surface smoothing procedures in large deformation frictional contact analysis. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 37:173–198 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piegl L. and Tiller W. The NURBS Book. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, \(2^{\text{nd}}\) edition (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzak G. and Curnier A. Large deformation frictional contact mechanics: continuum formulation and augmented lagrangean treatment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 177:351–381 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Popp A., Gee M.W. and Wall W.A. A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal-dual active set strategy. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 79:1354–1391 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Puso M.A., Laursen T.A. and j. Solberg. A segment-to-segment mortar contact method for quadratic elements and large deformations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 197:555–566 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder J. Anisotropic polyconvex energies. In J. Schröder, editor, Polyconvex Analysis, pages 1–53. CISM, Springer, Wien (2009). 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temizer I., Wriggers P. and Hughes T.J.R. Contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 200:1100–1112 (2011).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Temizer I., Wriggers P. and Hughes T.J.R. Three-dimensional mortar-based frictional contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 209-211:115–128 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tur M., Fuenmayor F.J. and Wriggers P. A mortar-based frictional contact formulation for large deformations using Lagrange multipliers. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 198:2860–2873 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wriggers P. Computational Contact Mechanics. \(2^{nd}\) ed., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (2006).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wriggers P. Nonlinear Finite Elements. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (2008).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wriggers P. and Hudobivnik B. A low order virtual element formulation for finite elasto-plastic deformations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 327:459–477 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wriggers P., Krstulovic-Opara L. and Korelc J. Smooth \({C}^1\)- interpolations for two-dimensional frictional contact problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 51:1469–1495 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wriggers P., Reddy B., Rust W. and Hudobivnik B. Efficient virtual element formulations for compressible and incompressible finite deformations. Computational Mechanics, 60:253–268 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wriggers P., Rust W. and Reddy B. A virtual element method for contact. Computational Mechanics, 58:1039–1050 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wriggers P., Schröder J. and Schwarz A. A finite element method for contact using a third medium. Computational Mechanics, 52:837–847 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ziefle M. and Nackenhorst U. Numerical techniques for rolling rubber wheels: treatment of inelastic material properties and frictional contact. Computational Mechanics, 42:337–356 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz O.C. and Taylor R.L. The Finite Element Method, volume 1. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 5th edition (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Wriggers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wriggers, P. (2018). Advanced Discretization Methods for Contact Mechanics. In: Popp, A., Wriggers, P. (eds) Contact Modeling for Solids and Particles. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 585. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90155-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90155-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90154-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90155-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics