Effect of an Emotional Video on Skin Conductance Response of Respondents in Dependence on Personality Type

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 715)

Abstract

This paper reports on the results of research whose aim was to find out whether and how the respondents’ skin conductance change due to emotions experienced while watching emotional videos and whether there is a relation between a type of personality and a type of “emotional” curves we measured (the respondents were the teachers of vocational subjects). Emotions arise as an immediate response to a current situation with regard to the individual’s experience, interests and goals, comprising both subjective experiences and physiological changes, changes in attention and readiness, and changes in motoric expressions. The paper aims to show how secondary school teachers experience emotions and whether there is a relation between the measured values of skin conductance and types of personality. We found out that the skin conductance method reliably measures the intensity of experiencing emotions. It became apparent that the intensity of experiencing emotions is connected with a personality type in certain cases.

Keywords

Emotions, skin conductance response Personality test Myers–Briggs type indicator Secondary school teacher 

References

  1. 1.
    Schmidt, L., Atzert, L.: Lehrbuch der Emotionspsychologie, Berlin, Köln (1966). 312 sGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reykowski, J.: Experymentalna psychologia emocji, Warszawa: PWN (1968). 579 sGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leeper, R.W.: A motivational theory of emotion to replace “emotion as disorganized response.”. Psychol. Rev. 55, 5–21 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goleman, D.: Práce s emoční inteligencí, Praha, Columbus (2000). 366 sGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stuchlíková, I.: Základy psychologie emocí, p. 227. Portál, Praha (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    James, W.: Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt, New York (1890)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qigley, K.S., Berntson, G.G.: Autonomie irigins of cardiac responses to nonsignal stimuli in the rat. In: Behavioral Neuroscience, s. 104, pp. 751–762 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thompson, R.A.: Emotion and self-regulation. In: Thompson, R.A. (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Socioemotional Development. University Of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    LeDoux, J.E.: Cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain. Cogn. Emot. 3, 267–289 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakonečný, M.: Psychologie osobnosti, ACADEMIA, Praha (1995). 336 sGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Říčan, P.: Psychologie osobnosti. Geada, Praha (2010). 208 sGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Šnýdrová, I.: Psychodiagnostika. Grada, Praha (2008). 144 sGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blatný, M., et al.: Psychologie osobnosti. Grada, Praha (2010). 304 sGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keirsey, D., Bates, M.: Jaký jste typ osobnosti?. Grada, Praha (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Picard, R.W., Fedor, S., Ayzenberg, Y.: Multiple arousal theory and daily-life electrodermal activity asymmetry. Emot. Rev. 8, 1–14 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malmivuo, J., Plonsey, R.: Bioelectromagnetism. The Electrodermal Response. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boucsein, W.: Electrodermal aktivity. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesVSB-Technical University of OstravaOstravaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations