Advertisement

Electrical Engineering Students’ Achievement in Measurement Accuracy of Digitized Signals – Work in Progress

  • Nissim Sabag
  • Elena Trotskovsky
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 715)

Abstract

The current paper presents of a continuous longitudinal research dealing with different aspects of accuracy and the way the students understand it. Previous studies have shown that understanding the accuracy concept is not obvious. A previous study exposed students’ difficulties in calculating measurement accuracy of digitized signals. After writing a special study unit on measurement accuracy and measurement error and adding it to the curriculum of Digital Electronics course, two questions questionnaire entered to the final test on digital electronics course. The students’ grades showed an improvement in understanding the accuracy concept, but not sufficient. The study unit included explanation, tutorial and homework. A replication of the previous experiment in Fall semester 2015 showed a substantial improvement in the students’ achievements regarding the accuracy concept. This time the students got explanation and example but no homework concerning the accuracy concept. Nevertheless, they had the chance to see and solve the previous questionnaire so the questions regarding accuracy did not surprise them. Solving old test questionnaires is a common mode of learning among our students therefore this may be the explanation of the improvement in the students’ grades.

Keywords

Misconception Accuracy Error Digitizing 

References

  1. 1.
    Sydenham, P.H., Thon, R. (eds.): Handbook of Measurement Science. Elements of Change, vol. 3, p. 1428. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Streveler, R.A., Litzinger, M.A., Miller, R.L., Stief, P.S.: Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: overview and future research directions. J. Eng. Educ. 97(3), 279–294 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results – Part 1: General principles and definitions. ISO 5725 – 1, First edition, 15 December 1994, p. 2 (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trotskovsky, E., Sabag, N., Waks, S., Hazzan, O.: Students’ Achievements in Solving Problems Using Models in Electronics. IEEE Trans. Educ. 58(2), 104–109 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2331918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trotskovsky, E., Sabag, N.: Students’ misconception of accuracy. In: Joint International Conference on Engineering Education & International Conference on Information Technology, ICEE/ ICIT 2014, Riga, pp. 148–155 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trotskovsky, E., Sabag, N.: How do engineering students misunderstand the concept of accuracy? – Work in progress. World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ. 12(4), 1–5 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trotskovsky, E., Sabag, N.: How electrical engineering students understand the accuracy concept concerning digitized signals. In: International Conference on Engineering Education ICEE, Zagreb, Croatia, July 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ORT Braude College of EngineeringKarmielIsrael

Personalised recommendations