Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reasoning with Risk: Teaching Probability and Risk as Twin Concepts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching and Learning Stochastics

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

Risk is a key aspect of life and probability is the mathematical tool to address risk. Our aim is to investigate how risk is embedded in probability and how probability can be used to solve problems of risk. Furthermore, we illustrate how risky situations are paradigmatic for the concept of probability, not least by the eminent role risk played for the emergence of probabilistic concepts. The analysis of risk forms the central section, which shows how risk is connected to probability. Decisions in risky situations draw from the various approaches to probability and from rational and behavioural views to decisions. The section on emerging concepts re-visits the development of probability and probabilistic thinking. Faced with the twin character of probability and risk, we argue that these concepts should be developed together in teaching. The conceptualisation of probability in terms of A Priori Theory (APT) Frequentist Theory (FQT) and Subjectivist Theory (SJT) forms the background to classify the pertinent constituents of the arguments. For understanding small probabilities/risks, we promote the ideas of a micromort (1 in a million chance of leading to death) and a microlife (a half-hour period, which is 1 in a million part of the average life span of a person aged 30 years).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an analysis of the meaning of risk in the context of statistical inference , see Borovcnik (2015).

References

  • Aikman, D., Barrett, P., Kapadia, S., King, M., Proudman, J., Taylor, T., et al. (2011). Uncertainty in macroeconomic policy-making: Art or science? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 369, 4798–4817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aktipis, C. A., & Kurzban, R. O. (2004). Is homo economicus extinct? Vernon Smith, Daniel Kahneman and the evolutionary perspective. In R. Koppl (Ed.), Evolutionary psychology and economic theory. Advances in Austrian economics (Vol. 7, pp. 135–153). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austrian Ministry of Health. (2012). Reply to the parliamentary query related to the purchase of breathing masks as precaution against the potential danger of an epidemic outbreak of swine flu H1N1 in 2005 by the Ministry of Health. Offenes Parlament. offenesparlament.at/gesetze/XXIV/J_12400/. Accessed 15 May 2017.

  • Batanero, M., & Borovcnik, M. (2016). Statistics and probability in high school. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Batanero, C., Chernoff, E., Engel, J. Lee, H., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham, Switzerland: Springer online. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31625-3_1.

  • Bedford, T., & Cook, R. (2001). Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (Eds.). (2004). The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez, J. L. (2000). Rationality, logic, and fast and frugal heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 744–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blastland, M., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2013). The norm chronicles. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M. (1997). Fundamentale Ideen als Organisationsprinzip in der Mathematik-Didaktik [Fundamental ideas as an organising principle in the didactics of mathematics]. Schriftenreihe zur Didaktik der Mathematik der Österreichischen Mathematischen Gesellschaft (ÖMG), 27, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M. (2006). Probabilistic and statistical thinking. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 484–506). Barcelona: ERME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M. (2015). Risk and decision making: The “logic” of probability. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1, 2 & 3), 113–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M. (2016). Probabilistic thinking and probability literacy in the context of risk. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 18(3), 1491–1516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M., & Bentz, H.-J. (1990). Intuitive Vorstellungen von Wahrscheinlichkeitskonzepten: Fragebögen und Tiefeninterviews. [Intuitive conceptions of probabilistic concepts: Questionnaire and in-depth interviews.] Technical Report. Klagenfurt: Klagenfurt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2011a). Risk in health: More information and more uncertainty. In Proceedings of the IASE Satellite Conference on Statistics Education and Outreach. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute. https://iase-web.org/documents/papers/sat2011/IASE2011PaperPoster2Borovcnik&Kapadia.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017.

  • Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2011b). Determinants of decision-making in risky situations. In Proceedings of the 58th World Statistics Congress. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute. http://2011.isiproceedings.org/papers/950138.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017.

  • Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2011c). Modelling in probability and statistics—Key ideas and innovative examples. In J. Maaß & J. O’Donoghue (Eds.), Real-world problems for secondary school students—Case studies (pp. 1–44). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovcnik, M., Kapadia, R. (2014). A historical and philosophical perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. Advances in mathematics education (Vol. 7, pp. 34). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (n.d.). What are the risk factors for skin cancer? Whashington: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/cancer/skin/basic_info/risk_factors.htm. Accessed 15 May 2017.

  • Chernoff, E., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2014). Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. Advances in mathematics education (Vol. 7). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çınlar, E. (2011). Probability and stochastics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, F. N. (1962). Games, gods and gambling. London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Fermat, P., & Pascal, B. (1654/1962). Correspondence, publ. 1679 in Toulouse; English translation in F. N. David (Eds.), Games, gods and gambling (pp. 229–253). London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B. (1937/1992). La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales Institut Henri Poincaré, 7, 1–68. Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources (chapters 1–4 translated by H. E. Kyburg Jr.) in S. Kotz, & N. L. Johnson, Breakthroughs in statistics. Vol. I. Foundations and basic theory (pp. 134–174). New York, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Laplace, P. S. (1812/1951). Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Journal de l’École Polytechnique VII/VIII, 140–172. English translation: A philosophical essay on probabilities (extended version). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, K. (2014). The most common misconception about probability? In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. Advances in mathematics education (Vol. 7, pp. ix–xiii). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubben, H.-H., & Beck-Bornholdt, H.-P. (2010). Mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit. Logisches Denken und Zufall. (With a probability coming close to certainty. Logical thinking and randomness.) Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroControl. (n.d.). Ash‐cloud of April and May 2010: Impact on air traffic. Doc394v1.0 28/6/10. Statistics and Forecast (STATFOR). www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/official-documents/facts-and-figures/statfor/ash-impact-air-traffic-2010.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2917.

  • Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1952). The expected-utility hypothesis and the measurability of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 60, 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2005). Towards “probability literacy” for all citizens: Building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school. Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 39–63). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Calculated risks: how to know when numbers deceive you. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O. (2007). Risk. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of science. plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/risk/. Accessed 15 May 2917.

  • Hawkins, A. E., & Kapadia, R. (1984). Children’s conceptions of probability—A psychological and pedagogical review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(4), 349–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitele, D. (1975). An epistemological view on fundamental stochastic ideas. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(2), 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J. C. (2009). Options, futures and other derivatives (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kapadia, R. (2011). Risk in science and society: towards new pedagogies of probability Bayes rules. Selçuk Journal of Applied Mathematics, Special Issue, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ki, E. Y., Park, J. S., Lee, K. H., & Hur, S. Y. (2016). Incidence and risk factors of lower extremity lymphedema after gynecologic surgery in ovarian cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 26(7), 1327–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F. (1908/2004/2016). Elementary mathematics from a higher standpoint. Vol. I: Arithmetic, algebra, analysis, Vol. II: Geometry, Vol. III: Precision mathematics and approximation mathematics. Berlin: Springer. New translation of the classic volumes. Elementary mathematics from an advanced standpoint. Vol. 1: Arithmetic, Algebra, Analysis, Vol. 2: Geometry. New York: Dover. Translation of Elementare Mathematik von höherem Standpunkte aus (3rd Edit. 1924–28; 1st Edit. 1908). Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933/1956). Foundations of the theory of probability. New York: Chelsea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maistrov, L. E. (1974). Probability theory: A historical sketch. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martignon, L., & Krauss, S. (2009). Hands-on activities for fourth graders: A tool box for decision-making and reckoning with risk. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education (IEJME), 4(3). In M. Borovcnik & R. Kapadia (Eds.), Special issue on “Research and Developments in Probability Education”, 227–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongin, P. (1997). Expected utility theory. In J. Davis, W. Hands, & U. Maki (Eds.), Handbook of economic methodology (pp. 342–350). London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928/1967). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference, part I and II. Biometrika, 20 A, 175–240; 263–294. Reprinted as Joint statistical papers, Nr. 1 and 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, M. D. (1987) Choices: An introduction to decision theory. University of Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1989). Decision traps: Ten barriers to brilliant decision making and how to overcome them. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandblom, G., Varenhorst, E., Rosell, J. Löfman, O., & Carlsson, P. (2011). Randomised prostate cancer screening trial: 20year follow-up. British Medical Journal, 342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schools Council Statistical Education Project 11–16 (1980). Teaching statistics 11-16: Statistics in your world. (a handbook and a series of booklets). Slough: Foulsham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. (1996). The significance of Jacob Bernoulli’s Ars Conjectandi for the philosophy of probability today. Journal of Econometrics, 75, 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. (2012). Using speed of ageing and “microlives” to communicate the effects of lifetime habits and environment. British Medical Journal, 345:e8223. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8223.

  • Spiegelhalter, D. (2014, April). What can education learn from real-world communication of risk and uncertainty? Invited lecture at the Eight British Congress on Mathematical Education, Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbring, H. (1991). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 135–167). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Styer, D. F. (2000). The strange world of quantum mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 727–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, R. (1919). Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung [Foundations of probability theory]. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 5, 52–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Plato, J. (1994). Creating modern probability: its mathematics, physics and philosophy in historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2016). Human papillomavirus and related diseases report. Austria. WHO: ICO Information Centre on HPV and Cancer. www.hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/AUT.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2917.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Statistik, Universität Klagenfurt, Universitätsstraße 65, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Manfred Borovcnik & Ramesh Kapadia

Authors
  1. Manfred Borovcnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramesh Kapadia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Borovcnik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Carmen Batanero

  2. College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

    Egan J Chernoff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borovcnik, M., Kapadia, R. (2018). Reasoning with Risk: Teaching Probability and Risk as Twin Concepts. In: Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. (eds) Teaching and Learning Stochastics. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72871-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72871-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72870-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72871-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation