Abstract
The situation of biology in France in the twentieth century has always been considered something of an oddity. The theories of the Darwinian Modern Synthesis and of population genetics were not included in standardized university curricula and the main research programs until the 1970s. Against the Darwinian picture that was developing abroad, French life scientists promoted various forms of Lamarckism. The aim of this chapter is to produce a general picture of these different twentieth century Lamarckian research programs which deeply structured various fields of the French life sciences, like morphology, zoology, paleontology but also microbiology and virology. We first recall the failure of the first Lamarckian program, based on a mechanistic understanding of life, and which aimed at explaining evolution in terms of cumulative adaptation through the inheritance of acquired characters. We show that during the interwar period, French Lamarckians were no longer unified in their understanding of the evolutionary process but instead defended a heterogeneous array of concepts. In particular, we examine philosopher Henri Bergson’s legacy, which was pivotal in the setting up of a second Lamarckian program that started to develop in the 1940s with the work of zoologists Albert Vandel and Pierre-Paul Grassé. While it is true that the various forms of Lamarckism delayed the reception of Darwinism and, to a lesser extent, genetics, we assess their impact on the way the Modern Synthesis and molecular biology were conceived and developed in France by non-Lamarckian biologists like Georges Teissier, Philippe L’Héritier, André Lwoff, or Jacques Monod.
Notes
- 1.
The anthropologist and biologist Armand de Quatrefages (1810–1892) popularized the term “transformism” [transformisme] during the debates surrounding the reception of Darwin’s Origin of Species. To avoid the problems resulting from the polysemy of “evolution,” he proposed that “transformism” should be preferred to designate what would later be called the evolutionary theory (see de Quatrefages 1870: 14–15). From the 1870s, “transformism” was frequently used by French scientists for almost a century.
- 2.
We would like to thank our friend and colleague Cristiana Oghiva-Pavie (Angers University, France) who translated for us part of Racovitza’s (1929) book that was published in Romanian.
- 3.
Vandel claimed that he was inspired by Jesuit paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin’s description of the law of “relais.”
- 4.
Grassé heavily implies on several occasions that the creation of the idiomorphon involves, in some way or another, supernatural forces. Grassé became increasingly vocal about his catholic faith as he got older.
- 5.
As early as in the late 1950s and early 1960s, L’Héritier used the term “epigenetics” [épigénétique] to denote this emerging field. Not only did he use the term, but he also proposed a definition which already fitted with our modern understanding of the concept (and despite the fact that, of course, molecular processes like DNA methylation were still completely unknown at the time): “The second [hereditary mechanism] […] only modifies the modes of expression of encoded structures […]. To designate this second type of hereditary mechanism, the term epigenetics has been proposed and seems well chosen.” (L’Héritier 1962: 16, our translation).
- 6.
Because of their Jewish origins, they were arrested by the French police and deported to Auschwitz in December 1943 where they died (Gayon and Burian 2017).
- 7.
In 1985, year of his death, Grassé was working on some new material, a book he would have entitled La Face cachée de l’évolution (The hidden side of evolution).
References
Azouvi F (2007) La gloire de Bergson Essai sur le magistère philosophique. Gallimard, Paris
Bergson H (1889) Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience. Félix Alcan, Paris
Bergson H (1896) Matière et Mémoire. Félix Alcan, Paris
Bergson H (1900) Le Rire. Félix Alcan, Paris
Bergson H (1907) L’Evolution créatrice. Alcan, Paris
Bernard C (1966 [1878]) Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux. Vrin, Paris
Boesiger E (1998) Evolutionary biology in France at the time of the evolutionary synthesis. In: Mayr E, Provine WB (eds) The evolutionary synthesis, perspectives in the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 322–328
Bonnier G (1890) Cultures expérimentales dans les Alpes et les Pyrénées. Rev Gén Bot 2:513–546
Bonnier G (1893) L’anatomie expérimentale. Rev Sci 31:225–231
Bowler P (1996) Reconciling science and religion. The debate in early-twentieth-century Britain. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Bowler PJ (2017) Alternatives to Darwinism in the early twentieth century. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 195–218
Burian RM, Gayon J (1999) The French school of genetics: from physiological and population genetics to regulatory molecular genetics. Annu Rev Genet 33:313–349
Burian RM, Gayon J (2004) National traditions and the emergence of genetics: the French example. Nat Rev Genet 5:150–156
Burian RM, Gayon J, Zallen DT (1988) The singular fate of genetics in the history of French biology, 1900–1940. J Hist Biol 21:357–402
Carton Y (2014) L’œuvre de Charles Bocquet (1918–1977), Directeur du LGEB du CNRS de 1965 à 1977. In: Loison L (ed) Le laboratoire CNRS de génétique évolutive de Gif. De part et d’autre de l’oeuvre de Georges Teissier, Paris, pp 81–109
Caullery M (1916) L’état présent du problème de l’évolution. Rev Sci 54:417–425
Caullery M (1931) Le problème de l’évolution. Payot, Paris
Conry Y (1974) L’introduction du darwinisme en France au XIXe siècle. Vrin, Paris
Cuénot L (1941) Invention et finalité en biologie. Flammarion, Paris
De Bont R (2010) Organisms and their Milieu. Alfred Giard, his pupils and the history of early ethology, 1870–1930. Isis 101:1–29
de Quatrefages A (1870) Charles Darwin et ses précurseurs français, Etude sur le transformisme. Germer Baillière, Paris
de Varigny H (1891) Le transformisme expérimental. Rev Sci 29:769–777
Delisle R (2009) Les Philosophies du néo-darwinisme. PUF, Paris
Depew DJ (2017) Darwinism in the 20th century: productive encounters with saltation, acquired characteristics, and development. In: Delisle RG (ed) The Darwinian tradition in context: research programs in evolutionary biology. Springer, Cham, pp 61–88
Diénert F (1900) Sur la fermentation du galactose et sur l’accoutumance des levures à ce sucre. Doctoral dissertation, Sceaux
Dobzhansky T (1975) Darwinian or ‘oriented’ evolution? Evolution 29(2):376–378
Dobzhansky T, Boesiger E (1983) Human culture, a moment in evolution. Columbia University Press, New York
Duclaux E (1898) Traité de microbiologie, Microbiologie générale, vol 1. Masson, Paris
Duclaux E (1899) Traité de microbiologie, Diastases, Toxines et Venins, vol 2. Masson, Paris
Esposito M (2013) Romantic biology 1890–1945. Pickering and Chatto, London
Gayon J (2008) L’Evolution créatrice lue par les fondateurs de la théorie synthétique de l’évolution. In: Fagot-Largeot A, Worms F (eds) Annales bergsoniennes IV L’Evolution créatrice 1907–2007: épistémologie et métaphysique. Presses universitaires de France, Paris, pp 59–84
Gayon J (2013a) Darwin and Darwinism in France before 1900. In: Ruse M (ed) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and evolutionary thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 243–249
Gayon J (2013b) Darwin and Darwinism in France after 1900. In: Ruse M (ed) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and evolutionary thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 300–312
Gayon J (2013c) Claude Bernard et l’hérédité. In: Duchesneau F, Kupiec JJ, Morange M (eds) Claude Bernard, La méthode de la physiologie. Editions Rue d’Ulm, Paris, pp 115–132
Gayon J (2014) Une expérience de sélection naturelle en conditions naturelles: L’Héritier, Neefs et Teissier, 1937. In: Loison L (ed) Le laboratoire CNRS de génétique évolutive de Gif. De part et d’autre de l’oeuvre de Georges Teissier, Paris, pp 65–80
Gayon J, Burian RM (2000) France in the Era of Mendelism (1900–1930). Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, Paris. Life Sci 323:1097–1106
Gayon J, Burian RM (2017) Eugène et Elisabeth Wollman: la question de la lysogénie. In: Loison L, Morange M (eds) L’invention de la régulation génétique. Les Nobels 1965 (Jacob, Lwoff, Monod) et le modèle de l’opéron dans l’histoire de la biologie. Editions Rue d’Ulm, Paris, pp 31–65
Gayon J, Veuille M (2001) The genetics of experimental populations: L’Héritier and Teissier’s populations cages. In: Singh R, Krimbas C, Paul D, Beatty J (eds) Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical, and political perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 77–102
Grassé P-P (1971) Toi, ce petit Dieu ! Essai sur l’histoire naturelle de l’homme. Albin Michel, Paris
Grassé P-P (1973) L’évolution du vivant: matériaux pour une nouvelle théorie transformiste. Albin Michel, Paris
Grasse P-P (1977) Evolution of living organisms: evidence for a new theory of transformation. Academic, New York
Grassé P-P (1980) L’Homme en accusation: De la biologie à la politique. Albin Michel, Paris
Haldane JBS (1950) Les mécanismes de l’évolution. In: Arambourg C (ed) Paléontologie et transformisme. Albin Michel, Paris
Herring E (2016) Des évolutionnismes sans mécanisme : les néolamarckismes métaphysiques d’Albert Vandel (1894–1980) et Pierre-Paul Grassé (1895–1985). Rev Hist Sci 69(2):369–398
Huxley J (1942) Evolution. The modern synthesis. Allen and Unwin, London
Jacob F (1998) Of flies, mice, and men. Harvard University Press, Harvard
Jacob F, Monod J (1961) Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol 3:318–356
Jeannel R (1950) La marche de l’évolution. Editions du Muséum, Paris
Judson HF (1996) The eight day of creation, makers of the revolution in biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
L’Héritier P (1955) Les virus intégrés et l’unité cellulaire. Année Biol 31:481–496
L’Héritier P (1962) Le problème de l’hérédité non chromosomique. Année Biol 4(1):3–34
L’Héritier P, Teissier G (1937) Une anomalie physiologique héréditaire chez la Drosophile. C R Acad Sci Paris 205:1099–1101
Lakatos I (1986) The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Le Dantec F (1904) L’hérédité des diathèses ou hérédité mendélienne. Rev Sci 17:513–517
Le Dantec F (1907) La Biologie de M. Bergson. Rev Mois 4:230–241
Limoges C (1998) A second glance at evolutionary biology in France. In: Mayr E, Provine WB (eds) The evolutionary synthesis, perspectives in the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 322–328
Loison L (2010) Qu’est-ce que le néolamarckisme? Les biologistes français et la question de l’évolution des espèces. Vuibert, Paris
Loison L (2011) French roots of French Neo-Lamarckisms, 1879–1985. J Hist Biol 44:713–744
Loison L (2012) Le projet du néolamarckisme français (1880–1910). Rev Hist Sci 65:61–79
Loison L (2013a) Georges Teissier (1900–1972) and the modern synthesis in France. Genetics 195:295–302
Loison L (2013b) Controverses sur la méthode dans les sciences du vivant: physiologie, zoologie, botanique (1865–1931). In: Duchesneau F, Kupiec JJ, Morange M (eds) Claude Bernard, La méthode de la physiologie. Editions Rue d’Ulm, Paris, pp 63–82
Loison L (2013c) Monod before Monod. Enzymatic adaptation, Lwoff, and the legacy of general biology. Hist Philos Life Sci 35:167–192
Loison L (2014) Introduction. In: Loison L (ed) Le laboratoire CNRS de génétique évolutive de Gif. De part et d’autre de l’oeuvre de Georges Teissier, Paris, pp 5–21
Loison L, Morange M (eds) (2017) L’invention de la régulation génétique. Les Nobels 1965 (Jacob, Lwoff, Monod) et le modèle de l’opéron dans l’histoire de la biologie. Editions Rue d’Ulm, Paris
Loison L, Gayon J, Burian RM (2017) The contribution – and collapse – of Lamarckian heredity in Pastorian molecular biology: 1. Lysogeny, 1900–1960. J Hist Biol 50:5–52
Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Mayr E (1998) The arrival of Neo-Darwinism in France. In: Mayr E, Provine WB (eds) The evolutionary synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 321–322
Monod J (1948) La victoire de Lyssenko n’a aucun caractère scientifique. Combat, 15 Sept 1948
Monod J, Cohn M, Pollock MR, Spiegelman S, Stanier RY (1953) Terminology of enzyme formation. Nature 172:1096
Morange M (1998) A history of molecular biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Paul HW (1985) From knowledge to power: the rise of science empire in France, 1860–1939. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rabaud E (1922) L’adaptation et l’évolution. Etienne Chiron Editeur, Paris
Racovitza E (1907) Essai sur les problèmes biospéologiques. Arch Zool Exp Gén 6:371–488
Racovitza E (1929) Evolutia si problemele ei. Astrei, Cluj
Rostand J (1962) Le passé du transformisme. Année Biol 4(1):339–357
Sapp J (1987) Beyond the gene, cytoplasmic inheritance and the struggle for authority in genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Simpson G (1950) L’orthogenèse et la théorie synthétique de l’évolution. In: Arambourg C (ed) Paléontologie et transformisme. Albin Michel, Paris
Soulez P, Worms F (1997) Bergson. Flammarion, Paris
Teissier G (1938) Une controverse sur l’évolution. Rev Encyclopédie Française, June 11–14
Teissier G (1945a) Mécanisme de l’évolution. La Pensée 2:3–19
Teissier G (1945b) Mécanisme de l’évolution. La Pensée 3:15–31
Teissier G (1952) Dynamique des populations et taxonomie. Ann Soc R Zool Belgique 83:23–44
Teissier G (1962) Transformisme d’aujourd’hui. Année Biol 4(1):359–374
Vandel A (1942) L’évolution du monde animal et l’avenir de l’espèce humaine. Sci Vie IXII(300):81–88
Vandel A (1958) L’Homme et l’évolution, édition revue et augmentée. Gallimard, Paris
Vandel A (1964) Biospéléologie. La biologie des animaux cavernicoles. Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Vandel A (1969) Pages choisies: Textes réunis par les amis de A. Vandel à l’occasion de son jubilé scientifique. Éditions-Impressions, Toulouse
Weismannn A (1892) Essais sur l’hérédité et la sélection naturelle. C. Reinwald, Paris
Wood P (2015) Darbishire expands his vision of heredity from Mendelian genetics to inherited memory. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 53:16–39
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loison, L., Herring, E. (2017). Lamarckian Research Programs in French Biology (1900–1970). In: Delisle, R. (eds) The Darwinian Tradition in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69123-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69123-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69121-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69123-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)