Skip to main content

Diary of a Policymaker

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ROI in Public Health Policy
  • 431 Accesses

Abstract

Policymakers are in search of evidence that resonates to their local needs (real-world practice). Often what is available is not in the format desired. This is particularly the case for economic evidence, where the traditional metric (cost/QALY (quality adjusted life year)) is seen as “abstract” in the context of real-world decision making by many. This chapter introduces return on investment (ROI) analyses that offer information on the costs and benefits of alternative policy actions. ROI information should usually be presented as a single, simplified metric making it easy for decision makers to relate it to their local contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Masic I, Miokovic M, Muhamedagic B. Evidence based medicine – new approaches and challenges. Acta Inform Med. 2008;16(4):219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. The Public Health Information and Data Tutorial. From evidence-based medicine to evidence-based public health. 2017. https://phpartners.org/tutorial/04-ebph/2-keyConcepts/4.2.1.html

  3. Cairney P, Oliver K. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cochrane Collaboration. What do we do? 2017. http://www.cochrane.org/about-us

  5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013 [PMG9]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Health technology assessment. 2017. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding-and-support/funding-for-research-studies/funding-programmes/health-technology-assessment/

  7. NHS. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. London: Secretary for Health, 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat Coalition Government; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. UK Government. Health and Social Care Act 2012. London: Lesiglation.gov.uk; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Owen L, Morgan A, Fischer A, Ellis S, Hoy A, Kelly MP. The cost-effectiveness of public health interventions. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012;34(1):37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trapero-Bertran M, Pokhrel S, Trueman P. Building the business case for Tobacco Control: a toolkit to estimate the economic impact of tobacco. Brunel Univeristy in asosciation with Tobacco Free Futures, Fresh Smoke Free North East & Smokefree South West, 2011. https://www.brunel.ac.uk/__data/assets/file/0017/144710/Technical-Report-16-Dec-2011.pdf

  11. EQUIPT. European-study on Quantifying Utility of Investment in Protection from Tobacco. 2016. http://www.equipt.eu/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pokhrel, S., Owen, L., Coyle, K., Coyle, D. (2017). Diary of a Policymaker. In: ROI in Public Health Policy. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68897-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68897-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68896-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68897-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics