Abstract
Considering adjacent parts in the finite element analysis (FEA) leads to a contact problem. There are several necessary configuration parameters in computational contact mechanics, like the contact stiffness or discretization. Due to this variety there is a multitude of papers regarding the correct range for contact parameters in terms of FEA.
In topology optimization - especially if the optimization target is set to maximal stiffness - the configuration of the contact problem is much more sophisticated. An overlarge contact stiffness for example leads to a phenomena which is called contact stiffness supports within this paper. This behavior results in a design proposal, which causes major load flow through the contact zone, whereas the rest of the component is removed.
The most difficult part in determining the appropriate range for configuration parameters is comparing different simulations. In topology optimization, it is not sufficient to compare certain stress or displacement values of selected degrees of freedom like it is common in structural mechanic simulations. Instead it is necessary to collate the topology of the resulting design proposals.
For this purpose an evaluation algorithm was designed, which supersedes the necessity of a visual evaluation by describing the similarity of two design proposals by means of a histogram. The result of a simulation with the identical design space but with a matching mesh - thus without contact zone - is used as reference for this computer-aided evaluation. This automated investigation of arbitrary contact configurations shows, that the values of the parameters are usually within the standard values (recommended in literature), but in a notably smaller interval. In general, smaller contact stiffness is required and the examined parameters are more sensitive in topology optimization. The valid intervals for configuration parameters, which were determined by this method, enable a more realistic way of considering the elastic environment in stiffness optimization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Frisch, M., Glenk, C., Dörnhöfer, A., Rieg, F.: Topologieoptimierung in kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen - Von der erfahrungsbasierten Konstruktion zum Einsatz der Topologieoptimierung im Produktentwicklungsprozess. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb (ZWF) 111, 243–246 (2016)
Ehrlenspiel, K., Kiewert, A., Lindemann, U.: KostengĂĽnstig Entwickeln und Konstruieren: Kostenmanagement bei der integrierten Produktentwicklung. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Albers, A., Nowicki, L.: Integration der Simulation in die Produktentwicklung - Neue Möglichkeiten zur Steigerung der Qualität und Effizienz in der Produktentwicklung. In: Symposium: Simulation in der Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung, 5–7 November 2003, Bremen, Germany, pp. 141–147 (2003)
Schumacher, A.: Optimierung mechanischer Strukturen: Grundlagen und industrielle Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Dörnhöfer, A.: Leichtbau mit partikelverstärkten Magnesiumlegierungen: Integration von virtueller Werkstoffentwicklung und Topologieoptimierung in den Produktentwicklungsprozess. Shaker Verlag, Dissertation, Universität Bayreuth (2008)
Eschenauer, H.: Rechnerische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Strukturoptimierung von Bauteilen. Univ.-Gesamthochschule Siegen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (1985)
Harzheim, L.: Strukturoptimierung: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Harri Deutsch, Frankfurt am Main (2014)
Bendsøe, M.P., Sigmund, O.: Topology Optimization: Theory. Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2003)
Frisch, M.: Entwicklung eines Hybridalgorithmus zur steifigkeits- und spannungsoptimierten Auslegung von Konstruktionselementen. Shaker Verlag, Dissertation, Universität Bayreuth (2015)
Olhoff, N., Bendsøe, M.P., Rasmussen, J.: On CAD-integrated structural topology and design optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 89, 259–279 (1991)
Laursen, T.A.: Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2003)
Nützel, F.: Entwicklung und Anwendung eines Finite-Elemente-Systems auf Basis von Z88 zur Berechnung von Kontaktaufgaben aus der Antriebstechnik. Shaker Verlag, Dissertation, Universität Bayreuth (2015)
Wriggers, P.: Finite element algorithms for contact problems. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2–4, 1–49 (1995)
Wriggers, P.: Computational Contact Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Cook, R., Malkus, D., Plesha, M., Witt, R.: Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis. Wiley, New York (2001)
Zienkiewicz, O., Taylor, R., Zhu, J.Z.: The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington (2013)
Felippa, C.: Introduction to Finite Element Methods. University of Colorado (2017). http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/CAS/courses.d/IFEM.d/
Billenstein, D., Zimmermann, M., Diwisch, P., Rieg, F.: Speedup of an iterative FE-Solver due to an optimal preconditioning having regard to the imposition of constraints. In: NAFEMS World Congress 2017, Stockholm, Schweden (2017)
Bathe, K.-J.: Finite Element Procedures. K.J. Bathe Publishing, Boston (2014)
Reference Manual, N.N.: Intel Math Kernel Library 11.2 (2014)
Dassault Systemes, N.N.: Abaqus Analysis User’s Guide 6.13 (2013)
Rieg, F., Hackenschmidt, R., Alber-Laukant, B.: Finite Element Analysis for Engineers: Basiscs and Practical Applications with Z88 Aurora. Hanser Verlag, MĂĽnchen (2014)
Wagner, N., Helfrich, R.: Topology and shape optimization of structures under contact conditions. In: European Conference: Simulation-Based Optimisation, NAFEMS, Manchester, United Kingdom (2016)
Bartelme, N.: Geoinformatik: Modelle, Strukturen. Funktionen. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Kalkhan, M.A.: Spatial Statistics: GeoSpatial Information Modeling and Thematic Mapping. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Billenstein, D., Glenk, C., Diwisch, P., Rieg, F. (2018). Investigation of Contact Settings on the Result of Topology Optimization to Avoid Contact Stiffness Supports. In: Schumacher, A., Vietor, T., Fiebig, S., Bletzinger, KU., Maute, K. (eds) Advances in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. WCSMO 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_110
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_110
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67987-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67988-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)