Advertisement

Designing an Open Architecture for the Creative Industry

  • Christian ZinkeEmail author
  • Michael BeckerEmail author
  • Stephan KlingnerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 506)

Abstract

Companies in the Culture and Creative Industry are characterized by highly networked value chains. However, this value network lacks a profound support in terms of information technology and structure resulting in time-consuming and error-prone manual labor. To overcome these challenges, we conceptualize an application framework for creative industries. In particular a software architecture design and a data design will be proposed with the help of a design science research approach. The goal of the resulting application framework is to support the digital transformation of companies in the creative industry towards collaborative networks.

Keywords

Music business Framework Design science research Collaborative networks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been done within the frame of the joint research project “MUWISTAR” which was funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Number: 01IS16018B) under the supervision of the PT-DLR. The authors thank for the funding.

References

  1. 1.
    Forum D’avignon: The economic contribution of the creative industries to EU GDP and employment (2014). http://www.forum-avignon.org/sites/default/files/editeur/2014-Oct-European-Creative-Industry-GDP-Jobs-full-Report-ENG.pdf
  2. 2.
    Bauckhage, T.: Das Ende vom Lied. Zum Einfluss der Digitalisierung auf die internationale Musikindustrie. Stuttgart, 113f (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kusek, D., Leonhard, G., Lindsay, S.G.: The Future of Music. Manifesto for the Digital Music Revolution. Berklee Press, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moreau, F.: The disruptive nature of digitization: the case of the recorded music industry. Int. J. Arts Manag. 15(2), 18–31 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bourreau, M., Moreau, F., Gensollen, M.: The digitization of the recorded music industry. Impact on Business Models and Scenarios of Evolution. SSRN J. (2008). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1092138
  6. 6.
    Bertschek, I., Ohnemus, J., Erdsiek, D., Kimpeler, S., Rammer, C., Shala, E.: Monitoringbericht 2016: Ausgewählte wirtschaftliche Eckdaten der Kultur-und Kreativwirtschaft. Langfassung. ZEW-Gutachten und Forschungsberichte (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ewig, M.: Der Transformationsprozess zum collaborative business. Eine strategische, organisatorische und informatorische Betrachtung. Schriften zur Wirtschaftsinformatik, Bd. 17. Lang, Frankfurt am Main, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ehrenberg, D., Ewig, M.: Collaborative Business—eine Herausforderung für die Wirtschaftsinformatik. In: Fink, K., Ploder, C. (eds.) Wirtschaftsinformatik als Schlüssel zum Unternehmenserfolg, pp. 43–71. DUV, Wiesbaden (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: On reference models for collaborative networked organizations. Int. J. Prod. Res. (2008). doi: 10.1080/00207540701737666
  10. 10.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks. A new scientific discipline. J. Intell. Manuf. (2005). doi: 10.1007/s10845-005-1656-3
  11. 11.
    Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Research in Information Systems (2004) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chatterjee, S., Hevner, A.: Design Research in Information Systems. Theory and Practice. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol. 22, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Solms, F.: Software Architecture Design (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weinreich, R., Sametinger, J.: Component models and component services: concepts and principles. Component-Based Software Engineering: Putting Pieces Together, pp. 22–64 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schumacher, F., Gey, R., Klingner, S.: Semantics for the music industry. In: Sack, H., Filipowska, A., Lehmann, J., Hellmann, S. (eds.) the 10th International Conference, Leipzig, Germany, pp. 77–83. doi: 10.1145/2660517.2660531
  17. 17.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data (2009). https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html. Accessed 27 Mar 2017
  18. 18.
    Feigenbaum, L., Herman, I., Hongsermeier, T., Neumann, E., Stephens, S.: The semantic web in Action. Sci Am. (2007). doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1207-90
  19. 19.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data-the story so far. Semantic services, interoperability and web applications: emerging concepts, pp. 205–227 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bizer, C., Lehmann, J., Kobilarov, G., Auer, S., Becker, C., Cyganiak, R., Hellmann, S.: DBpedia - a crystallization point for the Web of Data. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents on the World Wide Web (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.websem.2009.07.002
  21. 21.
    Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Finkelstein, A.: Business network management as a survival. Software ecosystems: analyzing and managing business networks in the software industry 29 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roson, R., et al.: Two-sided markets: a tentative survey. Rev. Netw. Econ. 4(2), 142–160 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burkard, C., Widjaja, T., Buxmann, P.: Software ecosystems. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. (2012). doi: 10.1007/s12599-011-0199-8
  24. 24.
    Ladid, L., Montes, A., Bruck, P.A., Ferri, F., Chbeir, R. (eds.): Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems - MEDES 2013. The Fifth International Conference, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 28 October 2013–31 October 2013. ACM Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Manikas, K.: Revisiting software ecosystems Research. A longitudinal literature study. Journal of Systems and Software (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.003
  26. 26.
    Clemens, S., Dominik, G., Stephan, M.: Component Software: Beyond Object-oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duvigneau, M.: Konzeptionelle Modellierung von Plugin-Systemen mit Petrinetzen, vol. 4. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heineman, G.T., Councill, W.T.: Component-Based Software Engineering. Addison-wesley, Reading (2001)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Crnkovic, I., Sentilles, S., Vulgarakis, A., Chaudron, M.R.V.: A classification framework for software component models. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2011). doi: 10.1109/TSE.2010.83
  30. 30.
    Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–356 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Applied Informatics at the University of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations