Queer Settlers in a One-Room Schoolhouse: A Decolonial Queerscape Pedagogy

  • Garrett W. Nichols
Part of the Queer Studies and Education book series (QSTED)


Garrett W. Nichols calls for a rethinking of the classroom as space for disrupting heteronormative discourses—discourses that Nichols links to settler colonialism—to open a space where we can hear, or sometimes re-hear, queer voices. Settler colonialism is a heteronormative project that relies on rhetorics of reproductive “inheritance” to naturalize the erasure of indigenous cultures. Pedagogies attuned to the realities of heteronormativity and settler colonialism require a pedagogical commitment to interrupting these discourses, especially in institutional structures whose existence relies on and supports settler ideologies. Queerscapes, per Gordon Brent Ingram, are spaces and planes of queer alliances formed within and overlapping with heteronormative spaces; the university classroom, with its imbricated personal histories, institutional memories, and power dynamics, is always-already a queerscape. Importantly, the classroom is also a “settlerscape,” composed of the multiple subjectivities that constitute modern settler society and made meaningful through histories of indigenous displacement. Recognizing this dynamic opens a space for unheard queer voices, argues Nichols, and lets us “re-hear” how non-queer stories and perspectives are made meaningful through their unspoken proximity to queerness and colonization. Nichols proposes a decolonial queerscape pedagogy that foregrounds the marginalized and oppressed identities that populate every classroom, while also denaturalizing the supposedly “natural” and “inevitable” rhetorics of heteronormativity, white supremacy, and settler colonization that inform the American academy.

Works Cited

  1. Castanha, Tony. 2015. The Doctrine of Discovery: The Legacy and Continuing Impact of Christian ‘Discovery’ on American Indian Populations. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 39 (3): 41–64. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohen, Cathy. 1997. Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics? GLQ 3: 437–465. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Driskill, Qwo-Li. 2010. Doubleweaving Two-Spirit Critiques: Building Alliances between Native and Queer Studies. GLQ 16 (1–2): 69–92. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2016. Asegi Stories: Cherokee Queer and Two-Spirit Memory. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Print.Google Scholar
  5. Driskill, Qwo-Li, Chris Finley, Brian Joseph Gilley, and Scott Lauria Morgensen. 2011. The Revolution Is for Everyone: Imagining an Emancipatory Future through Queer Indigenous Critical Theories. In Queer Indigenous Studies: Critical Interventions in Theory, Politics, and Literature, ed. Qwo-Li Driskill, Chris Finley, Brian Joseph Gilley, and Scott Lauria Morgensen, 211–221. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Print.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Random House. Print.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Random House. Print.Google Scholar
  8. Freire, Paulo. 1993. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 1970. New York: Continuum. Print.Google Scholar
  9. Gould, Janice. 1992. The Problem of Being ‘Indian’: One Mixed-Blood’s Dilemma. In De/Colonizing the Subject: The Politics of Gender in Women’s Autobiography, ed. Sidonie Smith and Julia Watson, 81–87. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Print.Google Scholar
  10. hooks, bell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge. Print.Google Scholar
  11. Ingram, Gordon Brent. 1997. Marginality and the Landscapes of Erotic Alien(n)ations. In Queers in Spaces: Communities, Public Places, Sites of Resistance, ed. Gordon Brent Ingram, Anne-Marie Bouthillette, and Yolanda Retter, 27–52. Seattle: Bay Press. Print.Google Scholar
  12. King, Lisa. 2012. Rhetorical Sovereignty and Rhetorical Alliance in the Writing Classroom: Using American Indian Texts. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture 12 (2): 209–233. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lyons, Scott Richard. 2000. Rhetorical Sovereignty: What Do American Indians Want from Writing? College Composition and Communication 51 (3): 447–468. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morgensen, Scott Lauria. 2011. Spaces Between Us: Queer Settler Colonialism and Indigenous Decolonization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Powell, Malea. 1999. Blood and Scholarship: One Mixed-Blood’s Story. In Race, Rhetoric, and Composition, ed. Keith Gilyard, 1–16. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook. Print.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2002. Listening to Ghosts: An Alternative (Non)argument. In ALT DIS: Alternative Discourses and the Academy, ed. Christopher Schroeder, Helen Fox, and Patricia Bizzell, 11–22. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook. Print.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2004. Down by the River, or How Susan La Flesche Picotte Can Teach Us about Alliance as a Practice of Survivance. College English 67 (1): 38–60. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rifkin, Mark. 2011. When Did Indians Become Straight? Kinship, the History of Sexuality, and Native Sovereignty. New York: Oxford University Press. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books. Print.Google Scholar
  20. Somerville, Siobhan. 2000. Queering the Color Line: Race and the Invention of Homosexuality in American Culture. Durham: Duke University Press. Print.Google Scholar
  21. Spurr, David. 1993. The Rhetoric of Empire: Colonial Discourse in Journalism, Travel Writing, and Imperial Administration. Durham: Duke University Press. Print.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garrett W. Nichols
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishBridgewater State UniversityBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations