Abstract
The evolved potentialities of information technologies permit data disambiguation, interoperability and sharing through the web to reach an effective comprehensive knowledge. International standards are published as a reference for integrating data in a common framework and in an open perspective. Standard ontologies exist both in the cartographic and the cultural heritage field; however, they are distinct standards, and some limits (in the spatial or semantic management) make them incomplete for being used to manage architectural heritage knowledge. It is necessary to exploit both disciplines’ contributions, integrating them in a model suitable for architectural heritage data management. In this paper, the ontological model for cartographic urban themes, OGC CityGML, is extended for managing architectural heritage multi-scale, multi-temporal, complex data. The conceptual framework is explained and some implementation aspects are considered, both for the definition of the extension and for the filling-in of such a structure with architectural heritage 3D data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barnaghi, P., Wang, W., Henson, C., Taylor, K.: Semantics for the Internet of Things: early progress and back to the future. IJSWIS 8(1), 1–21 (2012)
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Scholl, H.J.: Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 2289–2297. IEEE (2012)
Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: Smart Cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. Future Internet Assembly 6656, 431–446 (2011)
Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an ontology? In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0
Laurini, R.: Geographic ontologies, gazetteers and multilingualism. Future Internet 7(1), 1–23 (2015)
Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (2005)
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manage. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)
Worboys, M.F., Duckham, M.: GIS: A Computing Perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)
Laurini, R.: A conceptual framework for geographic knowledge engineering. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25(1), 2–19 (2014)
INSPIRE European Directive. http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
Open Geospatial Consortium. www.opengeospatial.org/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
OGC CityGML. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/citygml. Accessed 10 Nov 2015
OGC geoSPARQL. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosparql. Accessed 12 Nov 2015
World Wide Web Consortium. www.w3.org. Accessed 09 Nov 2015
SPARQL. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/. Accessed 12 Nov 2015
XML. www.w3.org/XML/. Accessed 09 Nov 2015
RDF. www.w3.org/RDF/. Accessed 10 Nov 2015
GML. www.opengeospatial.org/standards/gml. Accessed 12 Nov 2015
COLLADA. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/COLLADA. Accessed 12 Nov 2015
OWL. www.w3.org/2004/OWL/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
Geonames. http://www.geonames.org/. Accessed 12 Nov 2015
Restoration charters. http://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
Doerr, M., Ore, C.E., Stead, S.: The CIDOC conceptual reference model - a new standard for knowledge sharing. In: Tutorials, Posters, Panels and Industrial Contributions at the 26th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, ACS, vol. 83, pp. 51–56 (2007)
Getty vocabularies. http://vocab.getty.edu/. Accessed 12 Nov 2015
Getty ARCHES project. http://archesproject.org. Accessed 09 Nov 2015
Myers, D., Avramides, Y., Dalgity, A.: Changing the Heritage inventory paradigm, the ARCHES open source system. Conserv. Perspect. GCI Newslett. 28(2), 4 (2013)
Doerr, M., Hiebel, G., Eide, Ø.: CRMgeo: linking the CIDOC CRM to geoSPARQL through a spatiotemporal refinement. In: Institute of Computer Science, Technical report GR70013 (2013)
Ronzino, P., Niccolucci, F., Felicetti, A., Doerr, M.: CRMba a CRM extension for the documentation of standing buildings. Int. J. Digital Libr. 17(1), 71–78 (2015)
Laurini, R., Thompson, D.: Fundamentals of spatial information systems. Academic Press, London (1992)
Chiabrando, F., Spanò, A.: Points clouds generation using TLS and dense-matching techniques. A test on approachable accuracies of different tools. ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 5, 67–72 (2013)
Brahim, L., Okba, K., Laurini, R.: Mathematical framework for topological relationships between ribbons and regions. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 26, 66–81 (2015)
Solovyov, S.A.: Categorical foundations of variety-based topology and topological systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 192, 176–200 (2012)
OGC. CityGML UML diagrams as contained in CityGML Encoding Standard Version 2.0, OGC Doc. No. 12-019 (2012)
Métral, C., Falquet, G., Cutting-Decelle, A.F.: Towards semantically enriched 3D city models: an ontology-based approach. In: Academic Track of GeoWeb (2009)
Kolbe, T.H., Gröger, G., Plümer, L.: CityGML–3D city models and their potential for emergency response. In: Zlatanova, S., Li, J. (eds.) Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response. CRC Press. (2008)
CityGML ADEs. http://www.citygmlwiki.org/index.php/CityGML-ADEs
IFC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_Foundation_Classes. Accessed 09 Nov 2015
de Laat, R., van Berlo, L.: Integration of BIM and GIS: the development of the CityGML GeoBIM extension. In: Kolbe, T.H., König, G., Nagel, C. (eds.) Advances in 3D Geo-Information Sciences. LNG&C, pp. 211–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Costamagna, E., Spanò, A.: CityGML for architectural heritage. In: Rahman, A.A., Boguslawski, P., Gold, C., Said, M.N. (eds.) Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. LNG&C, pp. 219–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Costamagna, E., Spanò, A.: Semantic models for architectural heritage documentation. In: Ioannides, M., Fritsch, D., Leissner, J., Davies, R., Remondino, F., Caffo, R. (eds.) EuroMed 2012. LNCS, vol. 7616, pp. 241–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_24
Fan, H.C., Meng, L.Q.: Automatic derivation of different levels of detail for 3D buildings modelled by CityGML. In: 24th International Cartography Conference, Santiago, Chile, pp. 15–21 (2009)
Geographical linked open data. http://ows10.usersmarts.com/ows10/ontologies/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
Mennis, J.L.: Derivation and implementation of a semantic GIS data model informed by principles of cognition. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 27, 455–479 (2003)
Fonseca, F., Egenhofer, M., Davis, C., Camara, G.: Semantic granularity ontology-driven geographic information systems. AMAI Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 36(1–2), 121–151 (2002)
Scholl, M., Voisard, A.: Object-oriented database systems for geographic applications: an experiment with O2. In: Proc. Int. Workshop on Database Management Systems for Geographical Applications. Springer. (1992)
Belussi, A., Liguori, F., Marca, J., Migliorini, S., Negri, M., Pelagatti, G., Visentini, P.: Validation of geographical datasets against spatial constraints at conceptual level. In: UDMS 2011: 28th Urban Data Management Symposium, Delft, The Netherlands, 28–30 September 2011. Urban Data Management Society, OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology (2011)
Van den Brink, L., Janssen, P., Quak, W., Stoter, J.E.: Linking spatial data: automated conversion of geo-information models and GML data to RDF. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastruct. Res. 9, 59–85 (2014)
Van den Brink, L., Stoter, J.E., Zlatanova, S.: Modelling an application domain extension of CityGML in UML. In: ISPRS Conference 7th International Conference on 3D Geoinformation, The International Archives on the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 16–17 May 2012, Québec, Canada, vol. XXXVIII-4, part C26. ISPRS (2012)
Bastonero, P., Donadio, E., Chiabrando, F., Spanò, A.: Fusion of 3D models derived from TLS and image-based techniques for CH enhanced documentation. ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2, 73–80 (2014)
Chiabrando, F., Lingua, A., Piras M.: Direct photogrammetry using UAV: tests and first results. In: ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XL-1/W2, pp. 81–86 (2013). ISSN: 2194-9034
Dabove, P., Manzino, A.M., Taglioretti, C.: GNSS network products for post-processing positioning: limitations and peculiarities. Appl. Geomatics 6(1), 27–36 (2014)
Bryan, P., Blake, B.: Metric Survey Specifications for English Heritage. English Heritage, Swindon (2000)
Donadio, E., Spanò, A.: Data collection and management for stratigraphic analysis of upstanding structures. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management, pp. 34–39 (2015). doi:10.5220/0005470200340039, ISBN 978-989-758-099-4
ESRI: the multipatch geometry type. ESRI White Paper (2008). https://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/multipatch-geometry-type.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Noardo, F. (2017). A Spatial Ontology for Architectural Heritage Information. In: Grueau, C., Laurini, R., Rocha, J. (eds) Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management. GISTAM 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 741. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62618-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62618-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62617-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62618-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)