Skip to main content

A Spatial Ontology for Architectural Heritage Information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (GISTAM 2016)

Abstract

The evolved potentialities of information technologies permit data disambiguation, interoperability and sharing through the web to reach an effective comprehensive knowledge. International standards are published as a reference for integrating data in a common framework and in an open perspective. Standard ontologies exist both in the cartographic and the cultural heritage field; however, they are distinct standards, and some limits (in the spatial or semantic management) make them incomplete for being used to manage architectural heritage knowledge. It is necessary to exploit both disciplines’ contributions, integrating them in a model suitable for architectural heritage data management. In this paper, the ontological model for cartographic urban themes, OGC CityGML, is extended for managing architectural heritage multi-scale, multi-temporal, complex data. The conceptual framework is explained and some implementation aspects are considered, both for the definition of the extension and for the filling-in of such a structure with architectural heritage 3D data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barnaghi, P., Wang, W., Henson, C., Taylor, K.: Semantics for the Internet of Things: early progress and back to the future. IJSWIS 8(1), 1–21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Scholl, H.J.: Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 2289–2297. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: Smart Cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. Future Internet Assembly 6656, 431–446 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an ontology? In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laurini, R.: Geographic ontologies, gazetteers and multilingualism. Future Internet 7(1), 1–23 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manage. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Worboys, M.F., Duckham, M.: GIS: A Computing Perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laurini, R.: A conceptual framework for geographic knowledge engineering. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25(1), 2–19 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. INSPIRE European Directive. http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015

  11. Open Geospatial Consortium. www.opengeospatial.org/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015

  12. OGC CityGML. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/citygml. Accessed 10 Nov 2015

  13. OGC geoSPARQL. http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosparql. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  14. World Wide Web Consortium. www.w3.org. Accessed 09 Nov 2015

  15. SPARQL. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  16. XML. www.w3.org/XML/. Accessed 09 Nov 2015

  17. RDF. www.w3.org/RDF/. Accessed 10 Nov 2015

  18. GML. www.opengeospatial.org/standards/gml. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  19. COLLADA. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/COLLADA. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  20. OWL. www.w3.org/2004/OWL/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015

  21. Geonames. http://www.geonames.org/. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  22. Restoration charters. http://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-texts. Accessed 11 Nov 2015

  23. Doerr, M., Ore, C.E., Stead, S.: The CIDOC conceptual reference model - a new standard for knowledge sharing. In: Tutorials, Posters, Panels and Industrial Contributions at the 26th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, ACS, vol. 83, pp. 51–56 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Getty vocabularies. http://vocab.getty.edu/. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

  25. Getty ARCHES project. http://archesproject.org. Accessed 09 Nov 2015

  26. Myers, D., Avramides, Y., Dalgity, A.: Changing the Heritage inventory paradigm, the ARCHES open source system. Conserv. Perspect. GCI Newslett. 28(2), 4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Doerr, M., Hiebel, G., Eide, Ø.: CRMgeo: linking the CIDOC CRM to geoSPARQL through a spatiotemporal refinement. In: Institute of Computer Science, Technical report GR70013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ronzino, P., Niccolucci, F., Felicetti, A., Doerr, M.: CRMba a CRM extension for the documentation of standing buildings. Int. J. Digital Libr. 17(1), 71–78 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Laurini, R., Thompson, D.: Fundamentals of spatial information systems. Academic Press, London (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiabrando, F., Spanò, A.: Points clouds generation using TLS and dense-matching techniques. A test on approachable accuracies of different tools. ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 5, 67–72 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brahim, L., Okba, K., Laurini, R.: Mathematical framework for topological relationships between ribbons and regions. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 26, 66–81 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Solovyov, S.A.: Categorical foundations of variety-based topology and topological systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 192, 176–200 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. OGC. CityGML UML diagrams as contained in CityGML Encoding Standard Version 2.0, OGC Doc. No. 12-019 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Métral, C., Falquet, G., Cutting-Decelle, A.F.: Towards semantically enriched 3D city models: an ontology-based approach. In: Academic Track of GeoWeb (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kolbe, T.H., Gröger, G., Plümer, L.: CityGML–3D city models and their potential for emergency response. In: Zlatanova, S., Li, J. (eds.) Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response. CRC Press. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. CityGML ADEs. http://www.citygmlwiki.org/index.php/CityGML-ADEs

  37. IFC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_Foundation_Classes. Accessed 09 Nov 2015

  38. de Laat, R., van Berlo, L.: Integration of BIM and GIS: the development of the CityGML GeoBIM extension. In: Kolbe, T.H., König, G., Nagel, C. (eds.) Advances in 3D Geo-Information Sciences. LNG&C, pp. 211–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Costamagna, E., Spanò, A.: CityGML for architectural heritage. In: Rahman, A.A., Boguslawski, P., Gold, C., Said, M.N. (eds.) Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. LNG&C, pp. 219–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Costamagna, E., Spanò, A.: Semantic models for architectural heritage documentation. In: Ioannides, M., Fritsch, D., Leissner, J., Davies, R., Remondino, F., Caffo, R. (eds.) EuroMed 2012. LNCS, vol. 7616, pp. 241–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Fan, H.C., Meng, L.Q.: Automatic derivation of different levels of detail for 3D buildings modelled by CityGML. In: 24th International Cartography Conference, Santiago, Chile, pp. 15–21 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Geographical linked open data. http://ows10.usersmarts.com/ows10/ontologies/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015

  43. Mennis, J.L.: Derivation and implementation of a semantic GIS data model informed by principles of cognition. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 27, 455–479 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fonseca, F., Egenhofer, M., Davis, C., Camara, G.: Semantic granularity ontology-driven geographic information systems. AMAI Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 36(1–2), 121–151 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Scholl, M., Voisard, A.: Object-oriented database systems for geographic applications: an experiment with O2. In: Proc. Int. Workshop on Database Management Systems for Geographical Applications. Springer. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Belussi, A., Liguori, F., Marca, J., Migliorini, S., Negri, M., Pelagatti, G., Visentini, P.: Validation of geographical datasets against spatial constraints at conceptual level. In: UDMS 2011: 28th Urban Data Management Symposium, Delft, The Netherlands, 28–30 September 2011. Urban Data Management Society, OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Van den Brink, L., Janssen, P., Quak, W., Stoter, J.E.: Linking spatial data: automated conversion of geo-information models and GML data to RDF. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastruct. Res. 9, 59–85 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Van den Brink, L., Stoter, J.E., Zlatanova, S.: Modelling an application domain extension of CityGML in UML. In: ISPRS Conference 7th International Conference on 3D Geoinformation, The International Archives on the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 16–17 May 2012, Québec, Canada, vol. XXXVIII-4, part C26. ISPRS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bastonero, P., Donadio, E., Chiabrando, F., Spanò, A.: Fusion of 3D models derived from TLS and image-based techniques for CH enhanced documentation. ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2, 73–80 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chiabrando, F., Lingua, A., Piras M.: Direct photogrammetry using UAV: tests and first results. In: ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XL-1/W2, pp. 81–86 (2013). ISSN: 2194-9034

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dabove, P., Manzino, A.M., Taglioretti, C.: GNSS network products for post-processing positioning: limitations and peculiarities. Appl. Geomatics 6(1), 27–36 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bryan, P., Blake, B.: Metric Survey Specifications for English Heritage. English Heritage, Swindon (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Donadio, E., Spanò, A.: Data collection and management for stratigraphic analysis of upstanding structures. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management, pp. 34–39 (2015). doi:10.5220/0005470200340039, ISBN 978-989-758-099-4

  54. ESRI: the multipatch geometry type. ESRI White Paper (2008). https://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/multipatch-geometry-type.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Noardo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Noardo, F. (2017). A Spatial Ontology for Architectural Heritage Information. In: Grueau, C., Laurini, R., Rocha, J. (eds) Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management. GISTAM 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 741. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62618-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62618-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62617-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62618-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics