Skip to main content

Augmented Reality and Mobile Learning in a Smart Urban Park: Pupils’ Perceptions of the EduPARK Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Citizen, Territory and Technologies: Smart Learning Contexts and Practices (SLERD 2017)

Abstract

The EduPARK game is developed under a game-based learning methodology. It is designed for outdoor learning settings by employing geocaching principles and mobile Augmented Reality technologies. The game aims to develop users’ authentic and autonomous learning about diverse interdisciplinary themes in a smart urban park. It integrates learning guides for different target groups of basic education. The purpose of this paper is to present the game prototype development, which followed a design-based research approach. The evaluation of the game involved 74 pupils from two school levels (aged 9–10 and 13–14). They explored the game and their reactions were registered. Focus groups were conducted at the end of the experience. The evaluation allowed identifying positive characteristics of the game, such as immediate feedback and collaborative dynamics. Some questions included in the learning guides were perceived as difficult to understand and also some features came out to be considered for future improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akçayır M, Akçayır G (2017) Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educ Res Rev 20:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amado J (2014) Manual de investigação qualitativa em educação. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T, Shattuck J (2012) Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educ Res 41:16–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Graf S (2014) Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Educ Technol Soc 17:133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne R, Packer J (2002) Nature-based Excursions: School Students’ Perceptions of Learning in Natural Environments. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 11:218–236. doi:10.1080/10382040208667488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne R, Packer J, Hughes K (2008) Environmental awareness, interests and motives of botanic gardens visitors: Implications for interpretive practice. Tour Manag 29:439–444. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke B, Svanaes S (2015) Updated review of the global use of mobile technology in education, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy M (2014) Design principles for augmented reality learning. TechTrends 58:28–34. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0717-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gianni F, Divitini M (2015) Technology-enhanced smart city learning: a systematic mapping of the literature. Interact Des Archit J, 28–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Groff J, Clarke-Midura J, Owen VE et al (2015) Better learning in games: a balanced design lens for a new generation of learning games. MIT Education Arcade, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang G-J, Wu P-H, Chen C-C, Tu N-T (2015) Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students’ learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interact Learn Environ 4820:1–12. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1057747

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L, Becker SA, Cummins M et al (2016) The NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher, Education edn. Austin, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH (1994) Thinking technology: toward a constructivist design model. Educ Technol 34:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarainen AM, Metcalf S, Grotzer T et al (2013) EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Comput Educ 68:545–556. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naismith L, Lonsdale P, Vavoula G, Sharples M (2004) Literature review in mobile technologies and learning. Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker J (2011) A design-based research approach for creating effective online higher education courses. In: 26th Annual research forum: educational possibilities. Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Inc., Fremantle

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Sanagustín M, Hernández-Leo D, Santos P et al (2014) Augmenting reality and formality of informal and non-formal settings to enhance blended learning. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 7:118–131. doi:10.1109/TLT.2014.2312719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pombo L, Marques MM, Afonso L, et al (in press) An experience to evaluate an augmented reality mobile application as an outdoor learning tool

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky M (2007) Digital game-based learning, 2nd edn. Paragon House, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Radu I (2014) Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18:1533–1543. doi:10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radu I (2012) Why should my students use AR? A comparative review of the educational impacts of augmented-reality. In: ISMAR 2012 - 11th IEEE international symposium on mix augment reality 2012, Science Technology Paper, pp 313–314. doi:10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402590

  • Santos M, Chen A, Taketomi T (2014) Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Trans 7:38–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams A, Katz L (2001) The use of focus group methodology in education: Some theoretical and practical considerations

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by FEDER - Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 - Operacional Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation (POCI), and by Portuguese funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia in the framework of the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016542. The authors would also like to thank the EduPARK researchers, the participant pupils, teachers, and monitors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lúcia Pombo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pombo, L., Marques, M.M., Carlos, V., Guerra, C., Lucas, M., Loureiro, M.J. (2018). Augmented Reality and Mobile Learning in a Smart Urban Park: Pupils’ Perceptions of the EduPARK Game. In: Mealha, Ó., Divitini, M., Rehm, M. (eds) Citizen, Territory and Technologies: Smart Learning Contexts and Practices. SLERD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 80. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61322-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61322-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61321-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61322-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics