Skip to main content

Wellbeing in Politics and Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Wellbeing

Part of the book series: Wellbeing in Politics and Policy ((WPP))

Abstract

This chapter sets out why perspectives from the politics discipline are important to the study of wellbeing and highlights the potential contribution of the discipline. It briefly charts the rise of wellbeing in politics and policy before outlining the nature and scale of current initiatives at both international and national levels. It then reflects on the terrain of the politics discipline, before illustrating the relevance of the discipline to understanding, defining and measuring wellbeing in contemporary politics. It concludes by outlining the contributions to the volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2010). The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allin, P., & Hand, J. (2014). The Wellbeing of Nations: Meaning, Motive and Measurement. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anand, P., Hunter, G., Carter, I., Dowding, K., Guala, F., & van Hees, M. (2009). The Development of Capability Indicators. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(1), 125–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (1993). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (1998). Virtue and Eudaimonism. Social Philosophy and Policy, 15(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (2002). Should Virtue Make You Happy? In O. RabbÃ¥s, E. K. Eyjólfur, H. Fossheim, & M. Tuominen (Eds.), The Quest for the Good Life: Ancient Philosophers on Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. (2013). Beyond Components of Wellbeing: The Effects of Relational and Situated Assemblage. Topoi, 32, 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., & Reardon, L. (2013). An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Explaining the Rise of Well-Being in British Politics. Political Studies, 61(4), 898–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., & Reardon, L. (2016). The Politics and Policy of Wellbeing: Understanding the Rise and Significance of a New Agenda. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J., Burns, J. H., Hart, H. L. A. (Eds). (1996). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • CMEPSP. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available at: http://www.stiglitz-senfitoussi.fr/en/index.htm. Accessed December 17, 2016.

  • Crick, B. (1982). In Defence of Politics (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2006). Review of Research on Personal Well-Being and Application to Policy Making. London: Defra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, D., Fischer, J., Kirchgässner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2007). Is It Culture or Democracy? The Impact of Democracy and Culture on Happiness. Social Indicators Research, 82, 505–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, D., Fischer, J., Kirchgässner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2008). Direct Democracy and Life Satisfaction Revisited: New Evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C., & Imrie, R. (2008). Disability and the Implications of the Wellbeing Agenda: Some Reflections from the United Kingdom. Journal of Social Policy, 37(3), 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1983). Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flavin, P., Pacek, A. C., & Radcliff, B. (2011). State Intervention and Subjective Well-Being in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Politics and Policy, 39(2), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, M. (2013). The Tyranny of Relevance and the Art of Translation. Political Studies Review, 11(2), 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, W. B. (2009). A Guide to the Good Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2011). Prosperity Without Growth. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, C. (2011). Measuring Progress and Well-Being: Achievements and Challenges of a New Global Movement. Berlin: International Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. Cleveland/New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2011). What Did Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi Get Right and What Did They Get Wrong? Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1993). Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2004). Mill between Aristotle and Bentham. Daedalus, 133(2), 60–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G., Deaton, A., Durand, D., Halpern, D., & Layard, R. (2014). Wellbeing and Policy. Report commissioned by the Legatum Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, A. (2000). Economic Welfare Measurements and Human Well-Being, Discussion Papers in Social and Economic History, number 34, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (1979). Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oman, S. (2015). Measuring National Wellbeing: What Matters to You? What Matters to Whom? In S. White & C. Blackmore (Eds.), Cultures of Wellbeing: Method, Place, Policy. UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (tr. Goldhammer, A.). (2013). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RabbÃ¥s, O., Eyjólfur, E. K., Fossheim, H., & Tuominen, M. (2015). Introduction. In O. RabbÃ¥s, E. K. Eyjólfur, H. Fossheim, & M. Tuominen (Eds.), The Quest for the Good Life: Ancient Philosophers on Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011). Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robyens, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosendorff, P. (2005). Ideas, Interests, Institutions and Information: Jagdish Bhagwati and the Political Economy of Trade Policy. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Conference in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday at Columbia University, New York, August 5–6, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. (2012). Measuring Wellbeing: Towards Sustainability? Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. (2015). Happiness on Your Doorstep: Disputing the Boundaries of Wellbeing and Localism. Geographical Journal, 181(2), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1980). Equality of What? In S. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. (2007). Survival of the Ideas That Fit: An Evolutionary Analogy for the Use of Evidence in Policy. Social Policy and Society, 6, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. (2011). Telling Policy Stories: An Ethnographic Study of the Use of Evidence in Policy-Making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2012). The Price of Inequality. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuurman, S. (2000). The Canon of the History of Political Thought: Its Critique and a Proposed Alternative. History and Theory, 39, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, M., & Kelly, G. (2013). Is Everybody Happy? The Politics and Measurement of National Wellbeing. Policy & Politics, 41(2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. (1999). The Interface Between Evaluation and Public Policy. Evaluation, 5(4), 468–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. (2001). What Kind of Evidence in Evidence-Based Policy? Third International Interdisciplinary Evidence-Based Policies and Indicator Systems Conference, July 2001. CEM Centre, University of Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S., & Blackmore, C. (Eds.) (2015). Cultures of Wellbeing: Method, Place, Policy. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K. (2011). Organised Chaos: An Interpretive Approach to Evidence-Based Policy in Defra. Political Studies, 59, 959–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Bache .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bache, I., Scott, K. (2018). Wellbeing in Politics and Policy. In: Bache, I., Scott, K. (eds) The Politics of Wellbeing . Wellbeing in Politics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58394-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics