Skip to main content
Log in

What Did Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi Get Right and What Did They Get Wrong?

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this critical assessment of the Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi Report was to provoke discussion and improvements in future developments of quality of life research undertaken by official statistical agencies. I would like to thank Jochen Jesinghaus and Andrea Saltelli for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1999). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, second edition, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co.

  • Commission (2009). In J. E. Stiglitz, A. Sen, & J.-P. Fitoussi (Eds.), Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission.

  • Crummey, E., and Victor, P. (2008). Statistics Canada’s Ecological Footprint Workshop: Final Report, March 1. (Draft obtained from P. Victor, Professor of Environmental Studies, York University).

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. F. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gertner, J.: 2010, “The rise and fall of the G.D.P.”, New York Times, Sunday Magazine, May 16, p.MM60.

  • Gross, B. M. (1966). The state of the nation: Social systems accounting. In R. A. Bauer (Ed.), Social indicators. Cambridge: The M.I.TPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K. C., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., & Land, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Sociological Methods and Research, 35, 455–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T. (1973). A framework for the measurement of economic and social performance. In M. Moss (Ed.), The measurement of economic and social performance. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1970). Cost-benefit versus expected utility acceptance rules. Theory and Decision, 1, 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1978). Foundations of decision making. Ottawa: Canadian Library of Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1980a). North American social report: A comparative study of the quality of life in Canada and the USA from 1964 to 1974, volume one foundations, population and health. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1980b). North American social report: A comparative study of the quality of life in Canada and the USA from 1964 to 1974, volume two, crime, justice and politics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1981a). North American social report: A comparative study of the quality of life in Canada and the USA from 1964 to 1974, volume three, science, education and recreation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1981b). North American social report: A comparative study of the quality of life in Canada and the USA from 1964 to 1974, volume four, environment, transportation and housing. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1982). North American social report: A comparative study of the quality of life in Canada and the USA from 1964 to 1974, volume five, economics, religion and morality. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1988). A case for a progressive annual net wealth tax. Public Affairs Quarterly, 2, 105–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1997). Combining social economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 40, 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (Ed.). (2005). Citation classics from social Iidicators research: The most cited articles Edited and Introduced by Alex C. Michalos. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2006). “Logic, philosophy of science and the quality of life”. in the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (UNESCO, online encyclopedia).

  • Michalos, A. C., et al. (2010). An approach to the canadian index of wellbeing. Toronto: Atkinson Charitable Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, V., Huschka, D., & Michalos, A. C. (Eds.). (2008). Barometers of quality of life around the globe: How are we doing?. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. Ispra, Italy: Joint Research Centre European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1969). Community values, social measurement and transportation policy. In Highway Research Board (Ed.), Transportation and community values. Washington: National Academy of Science-National Academy of Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science. (1977). Game theorist Morgenstern Dies, p.649.

  • Sen, A. (1982). Choice welfare and measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1987). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, A., & Arsenault, J.-F. (2008). Living standards domain of the Canadian index of wellbeing. Toronto: Atkinson Charitable Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement: past, present and future. Social Indicators Research, 76(3), 343–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. C., Simard, C., & Sharpe, A. (2001). A proposed approach to environment and sustainable development indicators based on capital. Memorandum prepared for the national round table on the environment and the economy’s environment and sustainable development indicators initiative. Ottawa: NRTEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: tbp, ‘The good life: eighth century to fourth century BCE”. In K. Land (Ed.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Dordrecht: Springer.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Michalos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michalos, A.C. What Did Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi Get Right and What Did They Get Wrong?. Soc Indic Res 102, 117–129 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9734-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9734-0

Keywords

Navigation