Skip to main content

Assessment of Rockslide Dam Scenarios at Catchment Scale in the Context of Cascading Hazards

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides (WLF 2017)

Abstract

In rivers, temporary dams formed by landslides, rock falls or debris flows pose a severe threat to human life, public infrastructure and private assets. Besides the on-site impacts from the mass movement itself, these phenomena can cause disastrous off-site impacts by backwater inundation or catastrophic outburst floods. These secondary fluvial hazards can affect areas at substantial distances both up- and downstream of the site where the blockage occurred. In the present case study, the formation of rockslide dams and their subsequent impacts are viewed as a cascade of linked geomorphological and hydrological phenomena and assessed accordingly. The case study area extends over the two municipalities of Stilfs/Stelvio and Prad am Stilsferjoch/Prato allo Stelvio in the Autonomous Province of Bozen/Bolzano (South Tyrol) in Northern Italy, where the upper part of the slope above the village of Trafoi is at risk of a sudden failure. The present work builds on previous modelling attempts that predicted deposition heights up to 75 m in the channel of the Trafoi River. In this paper, we qualitatively identify all involved processes and create scenarios of various dam heights and dam breach processes. Modelling results show that the river downstream of the temporary dam features a channel conveyance sufficient for the peak discharge associated to a dam height of 4 m whereas dam heights of 16 m and 75 m would lead to severe flood events within the downstream municipality of Prad am Stilfser Joch. The modelled peak discharge values range from 35 m3 s−1 to 2554 m3 s−1, which fits well with values reported from other dam breach occurrences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beguería S, Van Asch TWJ, Malet JP, Gröndahl S (2009) A GIS-based numerical model for simulating the kinematics of mud and debris flows over complex terrain

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner GW (2014) Using HEC-RAS for dam break studies. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Centre, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner G W (2016) HEC-RAS river analysis system user’s manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Centre, Davis, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsini A., Iannacone JP, Ronchetti F, Salvini R, Mair V, Nossing L, Stefani M, Unterthiner G, Valentinotti G (2013) Hot Spots for Simplified Risk Scenarios of the Trafoi Rockslide (South Tyrol). In: Landslide Science and Practice. Presented at the World Landslide Forum 3, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Rome, pp. 739–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa JE, Schuster RL (1988) The formation and failure of natural dams. Geol Soc Am Bull 100:1054–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Tang CX, van Westen CJ, Alkema D (2012) Simulating dam-breach flood scenarios of the Tangjiashan landslide dam induced by the Wenchuan Earthquake. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:3031–3044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich DC (2008) Embankment dam breach parameters and their uncertainties. J Hydraul Eng 134:1708–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich DC (1995) Embankment dam breach parameters revisited. In: Water resources engineering. ASCE, pp 887–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill JC, Malamud BD (2016) Hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) within multi-hazard methodologies. Earth Syst Dyn Discuss 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannacone JP (2010) Runout simulations in support to a scenario-based hazard and risk assessment for the Trafoi Rockslide (South Tyrol, Italy). Master Thesis, Universitá degli Studi di Siena

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannacone JP, Luna BQ, Corsini A (2013) Forward simulation and sensitivity analysis of run-out scenarios using MassMov2D at the Trafoi rockslide (South Tyrol, Italy). Georisk Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 7:240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappes MS, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T (2012) Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards 64:1925–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzocchi W, European Commission, Directorate General for Research (2009) Principles of multi-risk assessment: interaction amongst natural and man-induced risks. EUR-OP, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzorana B, Comiti F, Scherer C, Fuchs S (2012) Developing consistent scenarios to assess flood hazards in mountain streams. J Environ Manage 94:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neri A, Aspinall WP, Cioni R et al (2008) Developing an Event Tree for probabilistic hazard and risk assessment at Vesuvius. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178:397–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce MW, Thornton CI, Abt SR (2010) Predicting peak outflow from breached embankment dams. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Stingl V, Mair V (2005) Einführung in die Geologie Südtirols. Autonome Provinz Bozen-Südtirol, Amt für Baustoffprüfung und Geologie, Bozen

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarvainen T, Jarva J, Greiving S (2006) Spatial pattern of hazards and hazard interactions in Europe. In: Natural and technological hazards and risks affecting the spatial development of European regions. Geological Survey of Finland, p 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Thun JL, Gillette DR (1990) Guidance on breach parameters. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl TL (1998) Prediction of embankment dam breach parameters: a literature review and needs assessment

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder JS, O’Connor JE (1997) Methods for predicting peak discharge of floods caused by failure of natural and constructed earthen dams. Water Resour Res 33:2337–2348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Zhang LM (2009) Breaching parameters for earth and rockfill dams. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135:1957–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LM, Zhang S, Huang RQ (2014) Multi-hazard scenarios and consequences in Beichuan, China: the first five years after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Eng Geol 180:4–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented within this paper is related to the master thesis of the first author, who wants to thank the group “Climate and Disaster Risk” of the Institute for Earth Observation at Eurac Research for their support. The kind data provision by the Civil Protection Agency of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Kofler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kofler, C., Comiti, F., Gems, B., Thiebes, B., Schneiderbauer, S., Schlögel, R. (2017). Assessment of Rockslide Dam Scenarios at Catchment Scale in the Context of Cascading Hazards. In: Mikoš, M., Casagli, N., Yin, Y., Sassa, K. (eds) Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides. WLF 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53485-5_79

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics