Skip to main content

Who Is Responsible? Institutions for Self-Control and the Spread of Problematic Online Advertising

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Responsibility

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 53))

  • 339 Accesses

Abstract

This article focuses on the “changing basis” of advertisings’ “responsibility” in the wake of new media and digitalization. The ethical concept of responsibility is usually defined as a four digit-relation: (1) Who is responsible (2) for what (3) toward whom or what – and (4) on the basis of which norm of judgment. Each of these relations will be shortly clarified and then related to or marked as changing circumstances in the advertising business. One of the main aspects of this article will be the question of who is responsible for potentially unethical advertisements and their circulation. It will be shown that the circle of responsible agents has extended as it not only includes the advertisers, the advertising agencies or their self-regulatory institutions, but also the everyday internet user. Hence internet users have to take more responsibility for their actions because they are not only users but also “produsers”: they communicate, exchange data, and spread advertisements.

The project ‘Ethics of Advertisement in Times of Media Change’ (project-number 249557738), by which the article was created, was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concepts “ethics ” and “moral” are closely related but mean different things in German. While “moral” refers to rules, norms, values of actions and practices of the daily life, “ethics ” is the reflection, evaluation and justification of those rules, norms and values, of “morals”.

  2. 2.

    This paper relates mainly to advertising in western developed countries.

  3. 3.

    Although their influence decreases because of the loss of control over internet content, which will be shown in Sect. 5.4.4.2.

  4. 4.

    The original reads: “[…] mit der systematischen Evaluation von Marketingentscheidungen, Marketingpraktiken und Marketinginstitutionen beschäftigt. Darüber hinaus werden […] Normen und Standards entwickelt, welche Marketingentscheidungen als moralisch richtig oder falsch kategorisieren.”

  5. 5.

    See Sect. 5.4.4.2.

  6. 6.

    A good term for this kind of independent content existences are the so-called memes (Becker et al. 2003). They can be interpreted as an “image, video, piece of text, typically humorous in nature that is copied and spread rapidly by internet users, often with slight variations” (Meme n.d.). Memes can be seen as a pars pro toto for a new user conduct, for new practices in the web. The three video examples described and discussed in this text are in a way such memes : They were rapidly copied and spread, and despite their old age (2004 and 2006) a lot of people know them.

  7. 7.

    It is called “viral” because information or data is getting spread from person to person in a very short time – just like a virus.

  8. 8.

    This quality of internet and interactivity stands in paradoxical contrast to the previously described enablement of advertisers to personalize advertisements, to place their ads more efficiently and fitting to the recipients – but it’s not necessarily a disadvantageous paradox.

  9. 9.

    Although these advertisements as examples represent an action (the creation of the advertisement by the advertiser), they are not the only actions that are important in this paper. But since actions are inseparably connected with the actor, the others will be discussed in Sect. 5.4.4, “Who is responsible?”

  10. 10.

    The original reads: “[…] erfordert den Bezug auf einen funktional oder sonstwie, z.B. moralisch oder rechtlich, ausgewiesenen (evaluativen oder normativen) Maßstab, der den Wert oder die Zulässigkeit von Handlungen und Unterlassungen, Geschehensverläufen und Folgen, Entscheidungen und Zwecksetzungen, Plänen und Programmen, Einstellungen und Grundsätzen bestimmt.”

  11. 11.

    The original reads: “[Das Sprachspiel der Verantwortung braucht] ein Subjekt, das Aufgaben zu übernehmen oder Handlungen auszuführen und gegebenenfalls Rede und Antwort zu stehen vermag.”

  12. 12.

    The original reads: “[In Wahrheit lässt sich aber eine Verantwortung] nicht nur natürlichen Subjekten, sondern auch ‘juristischen Personen’ zuschreiben, also einem Verein, einem Verband, selbst dem Staat und ‘natürlich’ ebenso einem Wirtschaftsunternehmen.”

  13. 13.

    The original reads: “Notwendige Bedingung für die Freiwilligkeit einer Handlung ist die Kenntnis der Einzelumstände; deren Nichtwissen, so können wir vorläufig festhalten, hebt die Freiwilligkeit auf.”

  14. 14.

    The webpage http://www.carbuzz.com/news/2012/6/28/The-Most-Controversial-Car-Commercials-of-All-Time-7709506/ for example says under each commercial: “Loved The Video? Share It!”; suggestions of a sharing channel are facebook or twitter.

  15. 15.

    This question is aimed to be answered in the authors’ research project at the University of Tübingen: “Advertising Ethics in Times of Medial Change”. Part of that research cover questions like this: How are advertising practitioners dealing with the fact that their messages could reach anybody – children, youths and vulnerable groups of persons – at any time?

  16. 16.

    The German title reads: “Viral marketing: Wie Sie Mundpropaganda gezielt auslösen und Gewinn bringend nutzen.”

  17. 17.

    The original reads: “Nichtwissen […] hebt Freiwilligkeit auf.”

  18. 18.

    The original reads: “Unwissenheit ist eine Folge des Willens.”

  19. 19.

    “Pitch” is a term of art inter alia for the advertising area. It is a competition for a new contract with a company/business between advertising agencies to represent their product.

References

  • AdvertJury. 2013, May 26. Gibbs – SR toothpaste. [Video file]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bULgPaQej4. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Ambler, Tim. 2008. Advertising. In The international encyclopedia of communication, ed. Wolfgang Donsbach, 43–49. Malden [et al.]: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Craig A., Akiko Shibuya, Nobuko Ihori, Edward L. Swing, Brad J. Bushman, Akira Sakamoto, Hannah R. Rothstein, and Muniba Saleem. 2010. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 126(2): 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASA. Advertising Standards Authority. n.d.-a. About regulation. https://www.asa.org.uk/About-ASA/About-regulation.aspx. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • ———. n.d.-b. Sanctions. https://www.asa.org.uk/Industry-advertisers/Sanctions.aspx. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • ———. n.d.-c. Online sanctions. https://www.asa.org.uk/Industry-advertisers/Sanctions/Online.aspx. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Bakir, Aysen, and Scott J. Vitell. 2010. The ethics of food advertising targeted toward children: Parental viewpoint. Journal of Business Ethics 91(2): 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayertz, Kurt. 1995. Eine kurze Geschichte der Herkunft der Verantwortung. In Verantwortung: Prinzip oder Problem, ed. Kurt Bayertz, 3–71. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar, Ahmet. 2013. Marketing the media with sexuality and violence: Is it ethical? Journal of Academic & Business Ethics 7(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Alexander, Christian Mehr, Heino Heinrich Nau, Gerson Reuter, and Dagmar Stegmüller. 2003. Gene, Meme und Gehirne: Geist und Gesellschaft als Natur; eine Debatte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York [et al.]: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, Andreas, and Darryn Mitussis. 2007. Computer ethics and consumer ethics: The impact of the internet on consumers’ ethical decision-making process. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 6(5): 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John M. 1916. The changing basis of economic responsibility. Journal of Political Economy 24(3): 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, Sue, Joanne H. Pratt, and Karen D. Loch. 2013. Personal information privacy and emerging technologies. Information Systems Journal 23(5): 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranor, Lorrie Faith, Hoke Candice, Leon Pedro Giovanni, and Alyssa Au. 2014. Are they worth reading? An in-depth analysis of online advertising companies’ privacy policies. Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC 2014), Arlington, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creamer, Matthew. 2014. Ad age agency of the year: The consumer. Advertising Age. http://adage.com/article/news/ad-age-agency-year-consumer/114132/. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Deutscher Werberat. n.d.-a. Öffentliche Rügen. http://www.werberat.de/ruegen. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • ———. n.d.-b. Deutscher Werberat und Online-Werbung, link to “Verlautbarung. http://www.werberat.de/deutscher-werberat-und-online-werbung. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Drumwright, Minette E., and Patrick E. Murphy. 2009. The current state of advertising ethics: Industry and academic perspectives. Journal of Advertising 38(1): 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, Jeanne B., Heidi Bechtoldt Baldacci, Tracie Pasold, and Jennifer Baumgardner. 2004. Violence exposure in real life, video games, television, movies, and the internet: Is there desensitization? Journal of Adolescence 27(1): 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbrich, Katja, and Holger Roschk. 2008. Advertising, cross-cultural. In The international encyclopedia of communication, ed. Wolfgang Donsbach, 50–56. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Lev. 2006. You – Yes, You – Are TIME’s person of the year. http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570810,00.html. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Höffe, Otfried. 2010. Soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen: Rechtsphilosophische Überlegungen. In Corporate Social Responsibility in der Wirtschaftskrise: Reichweiten in der Wirtschaftskrise, ed. Michael S. Aßländer and Albert Löhr, 35–48. München: Rainer Hampp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green. 2013. Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture, Postmillennial pop. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocson, Josiah. 2014, July 21. K fee commercial #1. [Video file]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNBGfzoacw4. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2005 [1797]. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. In Immanuel Kant, Werke in sechs Bänden, ed. Wilhelm Weischedel, Vol. Vol. 4. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, Cyrus. 2014. Kick ass at viral marketing: How to go viral for business success. Media Enterprises L.L.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, Barbara, Möller Ingrid, L. Rowell Huesmann, Lucyna Kirwil, Juliane Felber, and Anja Berger. 2011. Desensitization to media violence: Links with habitual media violence exposure, aggressive cognitions, and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100(4): 630–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langner, Sascha. 2009. Viral marketing: Wie Sie Mundpropaganda gezielt auslösen und Gewinn bringend nutzen. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Benjamin, Susan Fournier, and Frederic F. Brunel. 2013. When companies don’t make the ad: A multimethod inquiry into the differential effectiveness of consumer-generated advertising. Journal of Advertising 42(4): 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Kelly D., and N. Craig Smith. 2008. Commercializing social interaction: The ethics of stealth marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 27(1): 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall, Liz. 2008. Advertising, history of. In The international encyclopedia of communication, ed. Wolfgang Donsbach, 91–97. Malden et al.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meme. n.d. In Oxford dictionaries. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/meme. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Morewedge, Carey K., Young Eun Huh, and Joachim Vosgerau. 2010. Thought for food: Imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. Science 330(6010): 1530–1533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, Charles R., and Daniel G. Linz. 1995. Desensitization and resensitization to violence against women: Effects of exposure to sexually violent films on judgments of domestic violence victims. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Lance, and Guy J. Golan. 2006. From subservient chickens to brawny men: A comparison of viral advertising to television advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising 6(2): 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, Catharine H., et al. 2009. Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 92(2): 135–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Jef I. 2008. Advertising ethics. In The international encyclopedia of communication, ed. Wolfgang Donsbach, 77–82. Malden [et al.]: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricken, Friedo. 2003. Der Begriff der moralischen Handlung. In Allgemeine Ethik. Grundkurs Philosophie. Bd. 4, ed. Friedo Ricken, 91–117. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, Amin. 2014, December 2. Sportka cat commercial funny videos, funny video clips, funny movies, viral videos flv. [Video file]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2t70nC1IgWE. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Schudson, Michael. 2013. Advertising, the uneasy persuasion: Its dubious impact on American society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. Craig, Patrick E. Murphy, Alina Reibetanz, and Markus Scholz. 2015. Marketingethik – Ein Überblick. In Corporate social responsibility, ed. Andreas Schneider and René Schmidpeter, 721–734. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapf, Ingrid. 2010. Tod und Sterben. In Handbuch Medienethik, ed. Christian Schicha and Carsten Brosda, 391–405. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strenziok, Maren, Frank Krueger, Gopikrishna Deshpande, Rhoshel K. Lenroot, Elke van der Meer, and Jordan Grafman. 2010. Fronto-parietal regulation of media violence exposure in adolescents: A multi-method study. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience 6(5): 537–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TheBdscraps. 2012, March 3. Bulova: World’s first television advertisement. [Video File]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JenAyMmZ68. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Toffler, Alvin. 1980. The third wave. London [et al.]: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • TomTomOfficial. 2014, July 22. Alexandria Morgan runs strapless. [Video file]. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ur0qPdMhrag. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eimeren, Birgit, and Beate Frees. 2013. Rasanter Anstieg des Internetkonsums – Onliner fast drei Stunden täglich im Netz. Media Perspektiven 7(8): 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Stephen J.A. 2014. Radical media ethics. Nordicom Review 35(Special Issue): 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, Oscar. 2005. The picture of Dorian Gray (1890) (The complete works of Oscar Wilde. The Picture of Dorian Gray. The 1890 and 1891 Texts) vol. 3, 1–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, Rainer. 2011. Verantwortung. In Neues Handbuch philosophischer Grundbegriffe, ed. Petra Kolmer, Armin Wildfeuer, and Hermann Krings, 2309–2320. Freiburg/Breisgau/München: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jutta Krautter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krautter, J., Feiks, M., Müller, U., Zurstiege, G. (2017). Who Is Responsible? Institutions for Self-Control and the Spread of Problematic Online Advertising. In: Haase, M. (eds) Economic Responsibility. Ethical Economy, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52099-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics