Skip to main content

Sugarcane Cell Wall Structure and Degradation: From Monosaccharide Analyses to the Glycomic Code

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances of Basic Science for Second Generation Bioethanol from Sugarcane

Abstract

Pretreatments and enzymes have been a major hindrance to second-generation (2G) bioethanol production. As a result, most scientists have been focusing on the search for new enzymes and their subsequent characterization. Although this valuable knowledge has significantly improved the field generating initiatives of commercial production of 2G bioethanol, the cell walls themselves have received relatively little attention. In this chapter, we revise the work performed on sugarcane cell wall composition, structure, and architecture. From the status of looking exclusively to monosaccharide composition, research has evolved and several details about sugarcane cell wall polysaccharides and lignin were unrevealed. The studies about cell wall structure led to the proposition of the first model of sugarcane cell wall architecture in which macrofibrils (bundles of microfibrils) of cellulose are likely to be bound together by xyloglucan and arabinoxylans. These macrofibrils are covered with layers of more soluble hemicelluloses such as highly branched arabinoxylans and β-glucan. The lignin seems to be closely associated with the cellulose–hemicellulose domain, which is more hydrophobic than the other cell wall domains. Finally, lignin and cellulose–hemicellulose domains are embedded in a thin layer of pectin matrix. This model led to the proposition of a hypothesis that efficient cell wall degradation in the natural environment could be possible if the glycosyl hydrolases would sequentially degrade each layer at a time inwards towards cellulose microfibrils. This hypothesis was corroborated both during the attack of fungi to sugarcane biomass and during the aerenchyma formation in sugarcane roots. The highly complex sugarcane cell wall is now thought to be a result of a code, which is just starting to be unveiled. We believe that by further understanding the interactions among polymers and how endogenous enzymes attack cell walls, future strategies to induce endogenous biological pretreatments followed by the attack of enzyme consortia might significantly improve industrial processes for 2G bioethanol production from sugarcane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace B, Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J. 2002. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL Technical Report, TP-510-32438

    Google Scholar 

  • Boese BJ, Breaker RR (2007) In vitro selection and characterization of cellulose-binding DNA aptamers. Nucleic Acids Res 35(19):6378–6388

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borin GP, Sanchez CC, De Souza AP, Santana ES, Souza AT, Leme AFP, Squina FM, Buckeridge M, Goldman GH, Oliveira JVC (2015) Comparative secretome analysis of Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus niger during growth on sugarcane biomass. PLoS One 10(6):e0129275

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckeridge MS, Santos WD, Tiné MS, De Souza AP (2015) The cell wall architecture of sugarcane and its implications to cell wall recalcitrance. In: Lam E, Carrer H, Silva JA (eds) Compendium of bioenergy Plants: sugarcane. CRC Press, 125p

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckeridge MS, dos Santos WD, Tiné MAS, De Souza AP (2016) The cell wall architecture of sugarcane and its implications to cell wall recalcitrance. In: Lam E, Carrer H, da Silva JA, Kole C (eds) Compendium of bioenergy plants: sugarcane. CRC Press—Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckeridge MS, Rayon C, Urbanowicz B, Tiné MAS, Carpita NC (2004) Mixed linkage (1-3),(1-4)-beta-d-glucans of grasses. Cereal Chem 81(1):115–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckeridge MS, De Souza AP (2014) Breaking the “glycomic code” of cell wall polysaccharides may improve second-generation bioenergy production from biomass. Bioenergy Res 7:1065–1073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckeridge MS (2010) Seed cell wall storage polysaccharides: models to understand cell wall biosynthesis and degradation. Plant Physiol 154:1017–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM (1993) Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the cell wall during growth. Plant J 3:1–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crivellari AC (2012) Caracterização estrutural das hemiceluloses de paredes celulares de cana-de-açúcar. Dissertação de Mestrado, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. Pdf download: http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/41/41132/tde-10102012-084959/. Accessed 23 Aug 2016

  • De Souza AP, Grandis A, Leite DCC, Buckeridge MS (2014) Sugarcane as a bioenergy source: history, performance, and perspectives for second-generation bioethanol. Bioenergy Res 7:24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Souza AP, Kamei CLA, Torres AF, Pattathil S, Hahn MG, Trindade LM, Buckeridge MS (2015) How cell wall complexity influences saccharification efficiency in Miscanthus sinensis. J Exp Bot. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv183

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza AP, Leite DCC, Pathatil S, MG H, MS B (2013) Composition and structure of sugarcane cell wall polysaccharides: implications for second-generation bioethanol production. Bioenergy Res 6:564–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lima DU, Buckeridge MS (2001) Interaction between cellulose and storage xyloglucans: the influence of degree of galactosylation. Carbohydr Polym 46(2):157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzitec (2016) Anais do XII Seminário Brasileiro de Tecnologia Enzimática. http://www.ucs.br/site/eventos/enzitec-2016/anais/. Accessed 8 Aug 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandis A, De Souza AP, Tavares EQP, Buckeridge MS (2014) Using natural plant cell wall degradation mechanisms to improve second generation bioethanol. In: McCann M, Buckeridge MS, Carpita NC (eds) Plants & bioenergy. Springer, New York, pp 211–230

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guilherme AA, Dantas PVF, Santos ES, Fernandes FAN, Macedo GR (2015) Evaluation of composition, characterization and enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane bagasse. Brazil J Chem Eng 32(1):23–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Healey AL, Lee DJ, Furtado A, Simmons BA, Henry RJ (2015) Efficient eucalypt cell wall deconstruction and conversion for sustainable lignocellulosic biofuels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3:190

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latarullo MB, Tavares EQ, Maldonado GP, Leite DC, Buckeridge MS (2016) Pectins, endopolygalacturonases and bioenergy. Front Plant Sci 7:1401

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Low SY, Hill JE, Peccia J (2009) DNA aptamers bind specifically and selectively to (1→3)-β-d-glucans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 378(4):701–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masarin F, Gurpilhares DB, Bafa DCF, Barbosa MHP, Carvalho W, Ferraz A et al (2011) Chemical composition and enzymatic digestibility of sugarcane clones selected for varied lignin content. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:55

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patthathil S, Avci U, Miller JS, Hahn MG (2012) Immunological approaches to plant cell wall and biomass characterization: glycome profiling. In: ME H (ed) Biomass conversion: methods and protocols. Springer, New York, pp 61–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peng F, Ren JL, Xu F, Bian J, Peng P, Sun RC (2009) Comparative study of hemicelluloses obtained by graded ethanol precipitation of sugarcane bagasse. J Agric Food Chem 57:6305–6317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rezende CA, de Lima MA, Maziero P, de Azevedo ER, Garcia W, Polikarpov I (2011) Chemical and morphological characterization of sugarcane bagasse submitted to a delignification process for enhanced enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:54

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin S, Feller U (2001) Reversible accumulation of (1,3, 1,4)-β-d-glucan endohydrolase in wheat leaves under sugar depletion. J Exp Bot 52(365):2323–2332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin S, Buchala AJ, Fincher GB (2002) Induction of (1,3, 1,4)-beta-d-glucan hydrolases in leaves of dark-incubated barley seedlings. Planta 215(1):51–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saini JK, Saini R, Tewari L (2015) Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. 3 Biotech 5(4):337–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares EQP, De Souza AP, Buckeridge MS (2015) How endogenous plant cell wall degradation mechanisms can help achieve higher efficiency in saccharification of biomass. J Exp Bot 66:4133–4143

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiné MAS, Lima DU, Buckeridge MS (2003) Galactose branching modulates the action of cellulase on seed storage xyloglucans. Carbohydr Polym 52:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiné MAS, Silva CO, Lima DU, Carpita NC, Buckeridge MS (2006) Fine structure of a mixed-oligomer storage xyloglucan from seeds of Hymenaea courbaril. Carbohydr Polym 66:444–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohra M, Manwar J, Manmode R, Padgilwar S, Patil S (2014) Bioethanol production: feedstock and current technologies. J Environ Chem Eng 2:573–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Fan C, Hu H, Li Y, Sun D, Wang Y, Peng L (2016) Genetic modification of plant cell walls to enhance biomass yield and biofuel production in bioenergy crops. Biotechnol Adv 34:997–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Patthatil S, Mazumber K, Brehm A, Hahn MG, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Joshi CP (2010) Virus-induced silencing offers a functional platform for studying plant cell wall formation. Mol Plant 3:818–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos S. Buckeridge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buckeridge, M.S., De Souza, A.P., Tavares, E.Q.P., Cambler, A.B. (2017). Sugarcane Cell Wall Structure and Degradation: From Monosaccharide Analyses to the Glycomic Code. In: Buckeridge, M., De Souza, A. (eds) Advances of Basic Science for Second Generation Bioethanol from Sugarcane. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49826-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics