Abstract
The aims of this study were to (a) determine the extent to which university gym-users understood the environmental impact of common activities & foods, particularly protein consumption, and (b) explore factors considered important when purchasing food, and determine whether knowledge was associated with behaviour. 43 males (18–24 years) completed a four part questionnaire. Responders were asked to (1) read a passage about the life an active male and consider which components contributed most to his ‘carbon footprint’, (2) rate the environmental impact of common foods (3) describe their own protein consumption habits, and (4) identify which factors they considered important when buying food. It was found that (1) Few responders considered diet as factor contributing to a carbon footprint, focusing on more ‘visible’ activities such as driving, (2) Most responders were unsure of environmental impact of foods, especially foods grown out of season and dairy produce, (3) 68 % of responders consumed protein supplements and (4) No responders stated that environmentally-friendly packaging or country of origin was ‘very important’. In summary, there is low awareness of the environmental cost of activities and foods among university males. Ethical concern over food choice was somewhat higher in respondents with a higher environmental knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior. Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–475.
Barr, S. (2003). Strategies for sustainability. Citizens and responsible environmental behaviour. Area, 35(3), 227–240.
Berners-Lee, M. (2010). How bad are bananas? London, UK: Profile Books.
Body Building.com. (2015). How much protein should you consume? Available at: http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/bbprotein.htm. Accessed Jan 13, 2016.
Deckers, J. (2010). Should the consumption of farmed animal products be restricted, and if so by how much? Food Policy, 35(6), 497–503.
Goodland, R., & Anhang, J. (2009). Livestock and climate change. Washington: Worldwatch Institute.
Jackson, T (2005). Motivating sustainable consumption. Report from Sustainable Development Research Network, Policy Studies Institute, London.
Januszewska, R., Pieniak, Z., & Verbeke, W. (2011). Food choice questionnaire revisited in four countries. Does it still measure the same? Appetite, 57(1), 94–98.
Lindeman, M., & Väänänen, M. (2000). Measurement of ethical food choice motives. Appetite, 34(1), 55–59.
Martin, W. F., Armstrong, L. E., & Rodriguez, N. R. (2005). Dietary protein intake and renal function. Nutrition & Metabolism, 2, 25.
MRC. (2014). What do UK adults eat? A summary of key results from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey, Available at: www.mrc-hnr.cam.ac.uk. Accessed Jan 2, 2016.
Pollard, T., Steptoe, A., & Wardle, J. (1998). Motives underlying healthy eating: using food choice questionnaire to explain variation in dietary intake. Journal of Biosocial Science, 30, 165–179.
Prescott, J., Young, O., OiNeil, L., Yau, N. J., & Stevens, R. (2002). Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia and New Zealand. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 489–495.
Rodriguez, N., DiMarco, N., & Langley, S. (2009). Nutrition and athletic performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41(3), 709–723.
Schenck, R., & Huizenga, D. (2014). In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector, San Francisco, USA, ACLCA Vashon, WA, USA, 8–10 Oct 2014.
Steptoe, A., Pollard, T. M., & Wardle, J. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25(3), 267–284.
Tang, J. E., Moore, D. R., Kujbida, G. W., Tarnopolsky, M. A., & Phillips, S. M. (2009). Ingestion of whey hydrolysate, casein, or soy protein isolate: Effects on mixed muscle protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in young men. Journal of Applied Physiology, 107(3), 987–992.
Tesco. (2012). Product carbon footprint summary. Available at: https://www.tescoplc.com/assets/files/cms/Tesco_Product_Carbon_Footprints_Summary(1).pdf. Accessed Sept 8, 2015.
Too, L., & Bajracharya, B. (2015). Sustainable Campus: Engaging the community in sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 57–71.
Wilkinson, S. B., Tarnopolsky, M. A., MacDonald, M. J., MacDonald, J. R., Armstrong, D., & Phillips, S. M. (2007). Consumption of fluid skim milk promotes greater muscle protein accretion after resistance exercise than does consumption of an isonitrogenous and isoenergetic soy-protein beverage. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85(4), 1031–1040.
Williamson, D. (2014). Plant based eating; a viable solution for climate change and sustainability. Available at: http://www.alprofoundation.org/scientific-updates/sustainability/plant-based-eating-viable-solution-climate-change-sustainability/. Accessed Nov 20, 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reed, K.E. (2017). Environmental Awareness and Concern of the “carbon Cost” of Activities and Food Choice in Male University Gym Users, with Particular Reference to Protein Consumption. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Sustainable Development Research at Universities in the United Kingdom. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47883-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47883-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47882-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47883-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)