Skip to main content

The Medical and Endoscopic Management of Failed Surgical Anti-reflux Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Failed Anti-Reflux Therapy

Abstract

The current gold standard and most widely-applied surgical intervention in GERD is minimally invasive gastroesophageal fundoplication or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). Variations include partial (270°) vs total fundoplication (360°). Other variations of antireflux surgery include conventional or open Nissen fundoplication, anterior (Dor 120°) fundoplication, Toupet fundoplication, and Robot-assisted LNF [1]. Overall, surgery is a safe and effective modality for treatment of GERD with 80–90% of patients having relief of symptoms [2–5]. However, outcomes of anti-reflux surgery are variable and reported failure ranges from 2% to 30% depending on how “failure” is defined, e.g., required reoperation or resumed medical therapy. Similar variability of failure is reported for Nissen fundoplication performed for paraesophageal hernias in the surgical literature. Failure rates also depend on experience of the surgeon, with only a 50–60% success rate in less experienced centers [6, 7]. Up to 62% of patients who have had anti-reflux surgery report requiring proton pump inhibitor therapy in the long term [8]. In addition, up to 7.5% patients experience other symptoms such as dysphagia and bloating [9]. These patients are often managed medically and endoscopically with 1.6–9.6% needing re-operation [10, 11]. Newer surgical and endoscopic approaches to treatment of GERD are being introduced into the market. One such technique, Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA, LINX® Reflux Management System, Torax, St. Paul, MN), which involves laparoscopic placement of magnetic beads around the GE junction, was approved by the FDA in 2012. Retrospective studies show 97.8% improvement in GERD symptoms with MSA, similar to LNF [12], but a common side effect necessitating device removal is dysphagia. The device removal rate is 1–3%, with the outcomes for this technique improving with surgeon experience as was noted upon introduction of LNF [13, 14]. Thus with introduction of newer antireflux procedures, increasing rates of anti-reflux surgery, and ever-rising GERD prevalence paralleling the prevalence of obesity, it is expected that there will be an increasing number of patients with failed anti-reflux surgery needing medical, endoscopic or surgical management. In this chapter, we discuss medical and endoscopic management for patients with failed anti-reflux surgery, but not requiring surgical correction such as of slipped wraps and paraesophageal hernias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moore M, Afaneh C, Benhuri D, Antonacci C, Abelson J, Zarnegar R. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: a review of surgical decision making. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(1):77–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Dewandre J-M, Wahlen C, Monami B, et al. Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication at ten years after surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(1):159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fein M, Bueter M, Thalheimer A, Pachmayr V, Heimbucher J, Freys SM, et al. Ten-year outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(11):1893–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lafullarde T, Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Myers JC, Game PA, Devitt PG. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: five-year results and beyond. Arch Surg. 2001;136(2):180–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Crookes P, Oberg S, de Vos SM, Hagen JA, et al. The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: prospective evaluation of 100 patients with typical symptoms. Ann Surg. 1998;228(1):40–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vakil N, Shaw M, Kirby R. Clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication in a U.S. community. Am J Med. 2003;114(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Flum DR, Koepsell T, Heagerty PPC. The nationwide frequency of major adverse outcomes in antireflux surgery and the role of surgeon experience, 1992-1997. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195(5):611–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D, Goyal RK, Hirano I, Ramirez F, et al. Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285(18):2331–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pessaux P, Arnaud J-P, Delattre J-F, Meyer C, Baulieux J, Mosnier H. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: five-year results and beyond in 1340 patients. Arch Surg. 2005;140(10):946–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson MA, Frantzides CT. Complications and results of primary minimally invasive antireflux procedures: a review of 10,735 reported cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193(4):428–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, Carrara A, Marrese R, Gaspari AL, et al. Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg. 2004;239(3):325–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Reynolds JL, Zehetner J, Wu P, Shah S, Bildzukewicz N, Lipham JC. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation vs laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a matched-pair analysis of 100 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(1):123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith CD, Devault KR, Buchanan M. Introduction of mechanical sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease into practice: early clinical outcomes and keys to successful adoption. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(4):776–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harnsberger CR, Broderick RC, Fuchs HF, Berducci M, Beck C, Gallo A, et al. Magnetic lower esophageal sphincter augmentation device removal. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2015;29(4):984–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith CD, McClusky DA, Rajad MA, Lederman AB, Hunter JG. When fundoplication fails: redo? Ann Surg. 2005;241(6):861–9; discussion 869–71.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davis CS, Baldea A, Johns JR, Joehl RJ, Fisichella PM. The evolution and long-term results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. JSLS. 2010;14(3):332–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin DC, Chun CL, Triadafilopoulos G. Evaluation and management of patients with symptoms after anti-reflux surgery. Dis Esophagus. 2015;28(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers JC, Jamieson GG, Sullivan T, Dent J. Dysphagia and gastroesophageal junction resistance to flow following partial and total fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(3):475–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuboi K, Lee TH, Legner A, Yano F, Dworak T, Mittal SK. Identification of risk factors for postoperative dysphagia after primary anti-reflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):923–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang H, Dong D, Liu Z, He S, Hu L, Lv Y. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2016;30:3684–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, Lipham JC, Smith CD, DeVault KR, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients receiving a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for gastroesophageal reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(5):671–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Vernon AH, Sandone C, Gopal DV, Swanstrom LL, et al. Endoscopic appraisal of the gastroesophageal valve after antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(2):233–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson DA, Younes Z, Hogan WJ. Endoscopic assessment of hiatal hernia repair. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52(5):650–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oberg S, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Lord RV, Johansson J, Crookes PF, et al. Endoscopic grading of the gastroesophageal valve in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Surg Endosc. 1999;13(12):1184–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Horgan S, Pohl D, Bogetti D, Eubanks T, Pellegrini C. Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations? Arch Surg. 1999;134(8):809–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Galvani C, Fisichella PM, Gorodner MV, Perretta S, Patti MG. Symptoms are a poor indicator of reflux status after fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: role of esophageal functions tests. Arch Surg. 2003;138(5):514–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson SK, Jamieson GG, Myers JC, Chin K-F, Watson DI, Devitt PG. Recurrent heartburn after laparoscopic fundoplication is not always recurrent reflux. J Gastrointest Surg [Internet]. 2007;11(5):642–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arnold BN, Dunst CM, Gill AB, Goers TA, Swanström LL. Postoperative impedance-pH testing is unreliable after Nissen fundoplication with or without giant hiatal hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(9):1506–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bauer M, Meining A, Kranzfelder M, Jell A, Schirren R, Wilhelm D, et al. Endoluminal perforation of a magnetic antireflux device. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2015;29(12):3806–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spechler SJ. The management of patients who have "failed" antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(3):552–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aziz AMA, El-Khayat HR, Sadek A, Mattar SG, McNulty G, Kongkam P, et al. A prospective randomized trial of sham, single-dose Stretta, and double-dose Stretta for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):818–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Noar MD, Lotfi-Emran S. Sustained improvement in symptoms of GERD and antisecretory drug use: 4-year follow-up of the Stretta procedure. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(3):367–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Noar M, Squires P, Noar E, Lee M. Long-term maintenance effect of radiofrequency energy delivery for refractory GERD: a decade later. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2014;28(8):2323–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cadière GB, Rajan A, Rqibate M, Germay O, Dapri G, Himpens J, et al. Endoluminal fundoplication (ELF) – evolution of EsophyX, a new surgical device for transoral surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006;15(6):348–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hunter JG, Kahrilas PJ, Bell RC, Wilson EB, Trad KS, Dolan JP, Perry KA, Oelschlager BK, Soper NJ, Snyder BE, Burch MA, Melvin WS, Reavis KM, Turgeon DG, Hungness ES, Diggs B. Efficacy of transoral fundoplication vs omeprazole for treatment of regurgitation in a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(2):324–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Trad KS, Barnes WE, Simoni G, Shughoury AB, Mavrelis PG, Raza M, et al. Transoral incisionless fundoplication effective in eliminating GERD symptoms in partial responders to proton pump inhibitor therapy at 6 months: the TEMPO Randomized Clinical Trial. Surg Innov. 2015;22(1):26–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wendling MR, Melvin WS, Perry KA. Impact of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) on subjective and objective GERD indices: a systematic review of the published literature. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3754–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zacherl J, Roy-Shapira A, Bonavina L, Bapaye A, Kiesslich R, Schoppmann SF, et al. Endoscopic anterior fundoplication with the Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler (MUSE???) for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6-month results from a multi-center prospective trial. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):220–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim HJ, Kwon C-I, Kessler WR, Selzer DJ, McNulty G, Bapaye A, et al. Long-term follow-up results of endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with the MUSE™ endoscopic stapling device. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2016;30:3402–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Roy-Shapira A, Bapaye A, Date S, Pujari R, Dorwat S. Trans-oral anterior fundoplication: 5-year follow-up of pilot study. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2015;29(12):3717–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Danalioglu A, Cipe G, Toydemir T, Kocaman O, Ince AT, Muslumanoglu M, et al. Endoscopic stapling in comparison to laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(1):37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bell RCW, Hufford RJ, Fearon J, Freeman KD. Revision of failed traditional fundoplication using EsophyX transoral fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):761–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Mashimo MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Repaka, A., Mashimo, H. (2017). The Medical and Endoscopic Management of Failed Surgical Anti-reflux Procedures. In: Fisichella, P. (eds) Failed Anti-Reflux Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46885-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46885-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46884-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46885-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics