Skip to main content

Teachers’ Professional Noticing from a Perspective of Key Elements of Intensive, One-to-One Intervention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives, Contexts, and Frameworks

Part of the book series: Research in Mathematics Education ((RME))

  • 2368 Accesses

Abstract

Teaching practice, which uses student mathematical thinking to develop mathematical concepts, is valued by the mathematics education community, but the nuances of this practice are relatively unexplored (Leatham, Peterson, Stockero, & Van Zoest, 2015). We observed about 33 hours of video recordings of one-to-one instruction in the Mathematics Intervention Specialist Program (MISP), involving four teachers and six students, in order to identify patterns relating to how the teachers act in particular situations to achieve particular pedagogical goals. We conceptualized a set of instances of such patterns in one-to-one teaching sessions, called Key Elements (KEs)—micro-instructional strategies used by a teacher when interacting with a student solving an arithmetic task. Twenty-five KEs are described and incorporated into a framework consisting of four categories: before posing a task, during posing a task, during solving a task, and after solving a task. A scenario of one-to-one instruction is described and the teacher’s use of the following nine KEs is highlighted: Post-posing wait-time, post-responding wait-time, rephrasing the task, giving encouragement to a partly or nearly correct response, changing the setting during solving, scaffolding during, recapitulating, linking settings, and affirming. The three skills of professional noticing—attending, interpreting and deciding—are used to categorize the KEs of teaching occurring in the scenario. This highlights the linking of the KEs of instruction and the three skills of professional noticing. Thus, the study supports the notion that teacher development focusing on professional noticing can enhance teachers’ learning to use the KEs of one-to-one instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 438–453). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chae, H. M., Kim, J. H., & Glass, M. (2005, April). Effective behaviors in a comparison between novice and expert algebra tutors. In Proceedings of Sixteenth Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference (pp. 25–30). Dayton, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (1979). The early detection of reading difficulties. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Whitenack, J. W. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom video recordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(3), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellemor-Collins, D., & Wright, R. J. (2011). Unpacking mathematisation: An experimental framework for arithmetic instruction. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 313–320). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring sessions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(6), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandi, C., & Rowland, T. (2013). Developing one-to-one teacher–student interaction in post-16 mathematics instruction. In Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 385–392). Kiel, Germany: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leatham, K. R., Peterson, B. E., Stockero, S. L., & Van Zoest, L. R. (2015). Conceptualizing mathematically significant pedagogical opportunities to build on student thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 88–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, F. K. (2007). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Eugenio, B. D., Kershaw, T. C., Ohlsson, S., & Corrigan-Halpern, A. (2007). Expert vs. non-expert tutoring: dialogue moves, interaction patterns and multi-utterance turns. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (Vol. 4394, pp. 456–467). Mexico City: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, E. B. (1998). A model for analysing one-to-one teaching in the Maths Recovery Programme (Unpublished honors thesis). Southern Cross University, Lismore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. F. (2011). Situation awareness in teaching: What educators can learn from video-based research in other fields. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 51–65). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munter, C. (2010). Evaluating math recovery: The impact of implementation fidelity on student outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Person, N. K., Lehman, B., & Ozbun, R. (2007). Pedagogical and motivational dialogue moves used by expert tutors. In 17th Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Glasgow, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 3–13). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. T., & Wright, R. J. (2014a). Using an experimental framework of key elements to parse one-to-one, targeted intervention teaching in whole-number arithmetic. In C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 265–272). Vancouver, Canada: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. T., & Wright, R. J. (2014b). Beliefs of teachers who teach intensive one-to-one intervention about links to classroom teaching. In J. Anderson, M. Canvanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sydney (pp. 621–629). Sydney, Australia: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Canada: The Althouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. J. (2010). Key elements of intervention teaching. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. J., Ellemor-Collins, D., & Lewis, G. (2011). The P-4 Mathematics Intervention Specialist Project: Pedagogical tools and professional development resources. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd AAMT-MERGA Conference, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, 3rd–7th July, 2011 (pp. 1089–1097). Adelaide: AAMT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. J., Martland, J., Stafford, A. K., & Stanger, G. (2002). Teaching number: Advancing children’s skills & strategies. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thi L. Tran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tran, T.L., Wright, R.J. (2017). Teachers’ Professional Noticing from a Perspective of Key Elements of Intensive, One-to-One Intervention. In: Schack, E., Fisher, M., Wilhelm, J. (eds) Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives, Contexts, and Frameworks. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46753-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46753-5_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46753-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics