Abstract
There are a few things the reader must know about the gravitational force, and the problems theoreticians have in reconciling this force with quantum mechanics.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The Planck scale has been mentioned many times already. It is the scale of time, lengths, masses, and energies, where three grand physical theories all play equally significant roles, being special relativity (where the speed of light \(c\) is essential), quantum mechanics (with Planck’s constant \(\hbar\)) and Newton’s theory of gravity (with Newton’s constant \(G\)). Having
one finds
In this domain of physics, one expects Special and General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics all to be relevant, but a complete synthesis of these three has not yet been achieved—in fact, our continued struggle towards finding such a synthesis was one of the main motivations for this work.
It is not unreasonable to suspect that the Planck length is the smallest significant length scale in physics, and the Planck time is the smallest time scale at which things can happen, but there is more. General Relativity is known to cause space and time to be curved, so, if one might talk of some “lattice” in space and time, curvature may be expected to cause defects in this lattice. Alternatively, one might suspect that lattice-like behaviour can also be realized by imposing a cutoff in local momentum and energy scales (a so-called bandwidth cut-off [57]); however, with such a cut-off, deterministic models are difficult to construct.
It is also important to note that General Relativity is based on the local automorphism group. This means that time translations are locally defined, so that one may expect that gravity could be essential to realize locality requirements for the Hamiltonian. Mass, energy and momentum are local sources of gravitational fields, but there is more.
Gravitation is a destabilizing force. Causing masses to attract one another, it generates greater masses and thus even stronger attraction. This may lead to gravitational implosion. In contrast, electric as well as magnetic charges act repulsively (if they have equal signs), which makes electromagnetism a lot more stable than gravity as a force system.
When gravitational implosion takes place, black holes may form. Microscopic black holes must play an essential role at the Planck scale, as they may act as virtual particles, taking part in the vacuum fluctuations. When one tries to incorporate black holes in an all-embracing theory, difficulties arise. According to standard calculations, black holes emanate elementary particles, and this effect (Hawking effect [47, 48]) allows one to compute the density of quantum states associated to black holes. This density is very large, but as black holes increase in size, the number of states does not grow as fast as one might expect: it grows exponentially with the size of the surface, rather than the encapsulated volume. The quantum states that one might expect in the bulk of a black hole mysteriously disappear.
We expect all this to produce a profound effect on the putative deterministic models that could possibly lie at the basis of quantum theory. Discreteness of space and time comes for free, because one can also argue that the number of quantum states inside a volume \(V\) can never exceed that of a black hole occupying \(V\), so that the surface at the border of \(V\) dictates how many independent ontological states are allowed inside \(V\), an effect called the ‘holographic principle’ [81, 117]. Locality may come naturally because of the automorphism group as mentioned. Yet space–time curvature causes problems. Nature’s book keeping system is still very ill-understood.
References
J.B. Hartle, S.W. Hawking, Path integral derivation of black hole radiance. Phys. Rev. D 13, 2188 (1976)
S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975); Erratum: 46, 206 (1976)
A. Kempf, A generalized Shannon sampling theorem, fields at the Planck scale as bandlimited signals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2873 (2000)
L. Susskind, The world as a hologram. J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377 (1995). arXiv:hep-th/9409089
Papers by the author that are related to the subject of this work:
G. ’t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, Essay dedicated to Abdus Salam. Utrecht preprint THU-93/26. arXiv:gr-qc/9310026
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, a link is provided to the Creative Commons license and any changes made are indicated.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in the work's Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or reproduce the material.
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
’t Hooft, G. (2016). Quantum Gravity. In: The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41285-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41285-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41284-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41285-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)