Abstract
In this chapter, we present a passivity-based approach to a human–swarm collaboration problem. In the system, the operator is assumed to have a device to command a limited number of accessible robots, and to be in front of a monitor which displays certain information fed back from the robots. The intended control objective is then to render positions/velocities of the group of kinematic robots synchronized to desired references, which a human operator has, under distributed information exchanges among the robots and the operator. To this end, we first design a cooperative controller to be implemented on every robot and point out passivity of the collective robot dynamics. Inspired by this passivity property, we also determine the information visually fed back to the operator. Asymptotic position/velocity synchronization together with input–output stability for time-varying references is then demonstrated by assuming passivity of an appropriately defined human operator decision process. The aforementioned human passivity assumption is also studied through experiments. It is observed that the passivity of the decision process in the position control mode may be violated depending on the network connection and individual characteristics. Hence, a passivation scheme is presented for the operator’s decision process and it is demonstrated for three different interconnection structures and five different trial subjects.
This chapter was developed and enhanced from an earlier paper published as [16] \(\copyright \) 2015 IEEE.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson RJ, Spong MW (1989) Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay. IEEE Trans Autom Control 34(5):494–501
Bai H, Arcak M, Wen J (2011) Cooperative control design: a systematic, passivity-based approach. Communications and control engineering series. Springer, New York
Bai H, Shafi YS (2015) Synchronization under space and time-dependent heterogeneities. Automatica 62(12):274–283
Cai H, Mostofi Y (2015) To ask or not to ask: A foundation for the optimization of human-robot collaborations. In: Proceedings of the 2015 american control conference, pp 440–446
Colgate JE, Hogan N (1988) Robust control of dynamically interacting systems. Int J Control 48(1):65–88
Cummings ML (2004) Human supervisory control of swarming networks. In: 2nd annual swarming: autonomous intelligent networked systems conference
d’Andrea-Novel B, Bastin G, Campion G (1991) Modelling and control of non holonomic wheeled mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the 1991 international conference on robotics and automation, pp 1130–1135
de la Croix JP, Egerstedt M (2012) Controllability characterizations of leader-based swarm interactions. In: AAAI symposium on human control of bio-inspired swarms, Arlington, DC, November 2012
Egerstedt M (2014) Human interactions with complex networks. In: Samad T, Annaswamy AM (eds) The Impact of Control Technology, 2nd edn. IEEE Control Systems Society. http://www.ieeecss.org
Egerstedt M, de la Croix J-P, Kawashima H, Kingston P (2014) Interacting with networks of mobile agents. Large-scale networks in engineering and life sciences. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 199–224
Franchi A, Secchi C, Son HI, Bulthoff HH, Giordano PR (2012) Bilateral teleoperation of groups of mobile robots with time-varying topology. IEEE Trans Robot 28(5):1019–1033
Franchi A, Secchi C, Ryll M, Bulthoff HH, Giordano PR (2012) Shared control: balancing autonomy and human assistance with a group of quadrotor UAVs. IEEE Robotics Autom Mag 19(3):57–68
Freeman RA, Yang P, Lynch KM (2006) Stability and convergence properties of dynamic average consensus estimators. In: Proceedings of the 45th ieee conference on decision and control, pp 398–403
Giordano PR, Franchi A, Secchi C, Son HI, Bulthoff HH (2013) A passivity-based decentralized strategy for generalized connectivity maintenance. Int J Robot Res 32(3):299–323
Hatanaka T, Chopra N, Fujita M, Spong MW (2015) Passivity based control and estimation in networked robotics., Communications and control engineering series. Springer International Publishing
Hatanaka T, Chopra N, Fujita M (2015) Passivity-based bilateral human-swarm-interactions for cooperative robotic networks and human passivity analysis. In: Proceedings of the 54th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1033–1039
Hokayem PF, Spong MW (2006) Bilateral teleoperation: an historical survey. Automatica 42(12):2035–2057
Katayama T (2005) Subspace methods for system identification., Communications and control engineering series. Springer, London
Kottenstette N, McCourt MJ, Xia M, Gupta V, Antsaklis PJ (2014) On relationships among passivity, positive realness, and dissipativity in linear systems. Automatica 50(4):1003–1016
Lee D, Spong MW (2005) Bilateral teleoperation of multiple cooperative robots over delayed communication network: theory. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 360–365
Liu Y, Chopra N (2012) Controlled synchronization of heterogeneous robotic manipulators in task space. IEEE Trans Robot 28(1):268–275
McRuer D (1980) Human dynamics in man-machine systems. Automatica 16(3):237–253
Martinez S, Cortes J, Bullo F (2007) Motion coordination with distributed information. IEEE Control Syst Mag 27(4):75–88
McLurkin J, Smith J, Frankel J, Sotkowitz D, Blau D, Schmidt B (2006) Speaking swarmish: human-robot interface design for large swarms of autonomous mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the AAAI spring symposium
Mekdeci B, Cummings ML (2009) Modeling multiple human operators in the supervisory control of heterogenous unmanned vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 9th conference on performance metrics for intelligent systems
Nuno E, Basanezb L, Ortega R (2011) Passivity-based control for bilateral teleoperation: a tutorial. Automatica 47(3):485–495
Olsen DR, Wood B (2004) Fan-out: measuring human control of multiple robots. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems
Penin LF, Caballero A, Aracil R, Barrientos A (1998) Human behavior modeling in master-slave teleoperation with kinesthetic feedback. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vol 3, pp 2244–2249
Ren W, Beard RW (2008) Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control., Communications and control engineering seriesSpringer, London
Rodriguez-Seda EJ, Troy JJ, Erignac CA, Murray P, Stipanovic DM, Spong MW (2010) Bilateral teleoperation of multiple mobile agents: coordinated motion and collision avoidance. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 18(4):984–992
Secchi C, Franchi A, Bulthoff HH, Giordano PR (2012) Bilateral teleoperation of a group of UAVs with communication delays and switching topology. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 4307–4314
Varnell P, Zhang F (2013) Dissipativity-based teleoperation with time-varying communication delays. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on distributed estimation and control in networked systems, pp 369–376
Wang X, Shi Z, Zhang F, Wang Y (2015) Mutual trust based scheduling for (semi) autonomous multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 2015 american control conference, pp 459–464
Xia M, Antsaklis PJ, Gupta V (2014) Passivity analysis of human as a controller. ISIS Technical report, ISIS-2014-002
Yun X, Yamamoto Y (1993) Internal dynamics of a wheeled mobile robot. In: Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 1288–1294
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hatanaka, T., Chopra, N., Yamauchi, J., Fujita, M. (2017). A Passivity-Based Approach to Human–Swarm Collaboration and Passivity Analysis of Human Operators. In: Wang, Y., Zhang, F. (eds) Trends in Control and Decision-Making for Human–Robot Collaboration Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40533-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40533-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40532-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40533-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)