Blended Learning Approach: How Is the Learning Educational Paradigm Changing? Reflections and a Proposed Framework

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 19)


The use of technology has involved a revolution in higher education but even when the benefits of e-learning have still not been fully demonstrated, blended learning is increasingly gaining support as the model of the future in higher education, especially in those international ones in constant quest for excellence and innovation in the learning experiences they propose to their learners. But, how are educational institutions facing the use of technology for educational purposes? How do they have to change in order to be ready for successfully adopting this kind of learning model? In this paper we intend to answer these questions, and to provide some recommendations to educational institutions in order to help them understand how to lead the change management processes necessary for blended learning to become a full-fledged reality at their schools.


Blended learning Educational paradigm evolution Learning experience 


  1. 1.
    Caporarello, L., Sarchioni, G.: E-learning: the recipe for success. J. E-learning Knowl. Soc. 10(1), 107–118 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caporarello, L., Sarchioni, G.: Does technology-mediated learning matter for effective teams? In: Spagnoletti, P. (ed.) Organizational Change and Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nemanich, L., Banks, M., Vera, D.: Enhancing knowledge transfer in classroom versus online settings: the interplay among instructor, student, content, and context. Decis. Sci. J. Innovative Educ. 7(1), 123–148 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song, L., Singleton, E., Hill, J.R., Koh, M.H.: Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet High. Educ. 7(1), 59–70 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunken, M.J.: A review of research on lecturing. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2(1), 63–78 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milliken, J., Barnes, L.P.: Teaching and technology in higher education: student perceptions and personal reflections. Comput. Educ. 39(3), 223–235 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramsden, P.: Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge, London (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ong, C.-S., Lai, J.-Y.: Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 22(5), 816–829 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saade, R., He, X., Kira, D.: Exploring dimensions to online learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(4), 1721–1739 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, Y.-S., Wang, H.-Y., Shee, D.Y.: Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(4), 1792–1808 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, X., Li, Y., Tan, C.-H., Teo, H.-H.: Students’ participation intention in an online discussion forum: why is computer-mediated interaction attractive? Inf. Manag. 44(5), 456–466 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guri-Rosenblit, S.: Eight paradoxes in the implementation process of eLearning in higher education. High. Educ. Policy 18(1), 5–29 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kearsley, G. A: Guide to Online Education. (last access on 16 May 2015) (1998)
  14. 14.
    Liaw, S.S., Huang, H.M., Chen, G.D.: Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Comput. Educ. 49, 1066–1080 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Graff, M.: Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 34(4), 407–418 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liaw, S.S.: Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: a case study of the blackboard system. Comput. Educ. 51, 864–873 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker Jr, J.F.: Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Inf. Manag. 43(1), 15–27 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Otte, G., Benke, M.: Online learning: New models for leadership and organization in higher education. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 10(2), 23–31 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daniels, H.L., Moore, D.M.: Interaction of cognitive style and learner control in a hypermedia environment. Int. J. Instr. Media 27(4), 1–15 (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oh, E., Lim, D.H.: Cross relationships between cognitive styles and learner variables in online learning environment. J. Interact. Online Learn. 4(1), 53–66 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., Wisher, R.: The comparative effectiveness of web-based and classroom instruction: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 59, 623–664 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, D.S., Zhao, J.L., Zhou, L., Nunamaker, J.F.: Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Commun. ACM 47(5), 75–79 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bruckman, A.: The future of e-learning communities. Commun. ACM 45(4), 60–63 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., Ives, B.: Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Q. 25(4), 401–426 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Decker, T., Frailey, D., McNell, E., Mould, D.: Forum: debating distance learning. Commun. ACM 43(2), 11–15 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fontaine, G.: Presence in “Teleland”. In: Rudestam, K.E., Schoenholtz-Read, J. (eds.) Handbook of Online Learning: Innovations in Higher Education and Corporate Training, pp. 21–52. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martyn, M.: The hybrid online model: good practice. Educause Q. 26(1), 18–23 (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jennings, A., Mullally, A., O’Connor, C., Dolan, D.: Is the jury still out for “blended learning”?—use of a web-based collaborative teaching platform. In: Fillipe, J., Cordeiro, J., Pedrosa, V. (eds.) Web Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 355–366. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    So, H., Brush, T.A.: Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Comput. Educ. 51(1), 318–336 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reid-Young, A.: The key to e-learning is b-learning. HCi J. Inf. Dev. (last access on 16 May 2015) (2003)
  31. 31.
    Graham, C.R.: Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In: Moore, M.G. (ed.) Handbook of Distance Education, 3rd edn, pp. 333–350. Routledge, New York, NY (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reece, M., Lockee, B.: Improving training outcomes through blended learning. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 9(4), 49–57 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Picciano, A.G.: Blended learning: implications for growth and access. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 10(3), 85–91 (2006)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Singh, H., Reed, C.: A White Paper: Achieving Success with Blended Learning: ASTD State of the Industry Report. American Society for Training & Development, Alexandria, VA (2001)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thorne, K.: Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online & Traditional Learning. Korgan Page Ltd, London (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Insight, A.: 2011 Learning and Performance Technology Research Taxonomy. Ambient Insight, Monroe, WA (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., Hartmanet, J.: Blended learning: a dangerous idea? Internet High. Educ. 18, 15–23 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Cavanagh, T., Moskal, P.: Blended courses as drivers of institutional transformation. In: Kitchenham, A. (ed.) Blended Learning Across Disciplines: Models for Implementation. IGI Global, Hershey, PA (2011)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dziuban, C.D., Moskal, P.D., Bradford, G.R., Brophy-Ellison, J., Groff, A.T.: Constructs that impact the net generation’s satisfaction with online learning. In: Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., De Freitas (eds.) Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age: How Learners are Shaping Their Own Experiences. Routledge, New York, NY (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Norberg, A., Dziuban, C.D., Moskal, P.D.: A time-based blended learning model. On the Horizon 19(3), 207–216 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stacey, E., Gerbic, P.: Success factors for blended learning. In: Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne. (last access on 16 May 2015) (2008)
  42. 42.
    Janicki, T., Steinberg, G.: Evaluation of a computer-supported learning system. Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ. 1(2), 203–223 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hargreaves, A.: The emotions of teaching and educational change. In: Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., Hopkins, D. (eds.) International Handbook of Educational Change. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Garrison, D.R., Vaughan, N.D.: Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: two case studies. Internet High. Educ. 18, 24–28 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kotter, J.P.: Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2007)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ginsberg, A., Venkatraman, N.: Institutional initiatives for technological change: from issue interpretation to strategic choice. Organ. Stud. 16(3), 425–448 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and Technology, and SDA Bocconi School of ManagementBocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.ESADE Center for Educational Innovation, ESADE Business & Law SchoolsRamon Llull UniversityBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations