Skip to main content

EUFolio: A Classroom ePortfolio Pilot Project

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools
  • 1538 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter details the participation of Ireland as one of seven European countries in the EUfolio Classroom ePortfolios project. This was a 2-year project (May 2013–May 2015) funded by the European Commission under the framework of the Lifelong Learning Programme (KA1—Implementation of the European strategic objectives in Education and Training). The idea for the EUfolio project came from the ICT and Education Working Group created under the Education and Training 2020 programme, a network that includes 24 Ministry of Education representatives. A number of members came together with a common interest in implementing ePortfolios at national level leading to the inception of this initiative. Ireland was one of seven European countries that participated in this ePortfolio project, which had a focus on designing and testing innovative ePortfolio models that would inform the implementation of innovative learning environments across Europe.

This chapter focuses on the experiences of the Irish pilot, and demonstrate examples of where ePortfolios were used to promote a collaborative approach to assessment, where the interactions between teacher and student opened up the learning process to become a reciprocal and dialogic activity; a more supportive and inclusive culture where formative practices in the classroom could flourish.

Using an ePortfolio allowed students to show achievements in a variety of ways, give a clear vision of their learning journey thus far, and provide a platform for peer and self-assessment. All these components can contribute to ensuring a learning and assessment system that places students at the centre of the learning process, accommodates the diverse needs of learners, impacts positively on student motivation, and engages students in experiences appropriate to their twenty-first century.

Ben Murray and Sinéad Tuohy are seconded second-level teachers who were EUfolio project researchers and mentored Irish schools as part of the EUfolio Classroom ePortfolios project. Their research interests include ongoing assessment, the disruptive use of technology and developing teacher collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This Framework for Junior Cycle (2012) has since been revised with A Framework for Junior Cycle 2015. It can be accessed here: https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/Framework-for-Junior-Cycle-2015.pdf.

  2. 2.

    The revised Framework for Junior Cycle 2015 (p.13) now includes eight key skills. https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-reports/Framework-for-Junior-Cycle-2015.pdf.

  3. 3.

    Revised in Framework for Junior Cycle 2015 and renamed Classroom Based Assessment(s) https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/Framework-for-Junior-Cycle-2015.pdf.

  4. 4.

    In the code presented here, IE refers to the country (Ireland ), S refers to the school, T refers to teacher (within the particular school), P refers to student (within the particular school) and M refers to an Irish mentor on the EUFolio project.

References

  • Abrami, P. C., & Barrett, H. (2005). Directions for research and development on electronic portfolios. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alawdat, M. (2014). English writing students’ perspective of using ePortfolios in the writing class. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(6-3), 1–11. Special Issue: Computer-Assisted Language Learning & Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett. (2004). Electronic portfolios as digital stories of deep learning. Retrieved October 16, 2015, from http://electronicportfolios.org/digistory/epstory.html.

  • Davies, A. (2007). Making classroom assessment work. Courtenay, B.C.: Connections Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Skills. (2012). A framework for junior cycle. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Skills. (2015). A framework for junior cycle. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. C., & Brown, A. R. (2006). The art of ePortfolios: Insights from the creative arts experience. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 418–431). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economou, A., Avraamidou, A. (2015). EU classroom ePortfolios pilot evaluation results [online]. Retrieved January 6, 2016, from eufolio.eu/docs/pilotevaluationresults.pdf.

  • EUfolio. (2015). ePortfolio implementation guide for policymakers and practitioners. Retrieved October 15, 2015, from https://eufolioresources.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/eportfolio-implementation-guide_en.pdf.

  • Himpsl-Gutermann, K. (2012). “E-portfolios in der universitären Weiterbildung - Studierende im Spannungsfeld von Reflexivem Lernen und Digital Career Identity,” Alpen-Adria-University Klagenfurt, Vienna, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • JISC. (2008). Effective practices in portfolios. Retrieved October 1, 2015, from at http://www.ssphplus.info/files/effective_practice_e-portfolios.pdf.

  • Klenowski, V. (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, C., Depaepe, J., Lambert, L., & Anderson, D. (2007). Eportfolios in action. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 43(2), 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, E. (2009). 10 Traits of highly effective schools: Raising the achievement bar for all students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Level 2 Planning Toolkit, Sample ePortfolio [online], available: http://www.ncca.ie/en/Curriculum_and_Assessment/Inclusion/Special_Educational_Needs/Level_2_Toolkit/Sample_eportfolio/ [accessed 5th November 2014].

  • National Council for Curriculum and Assesssment (NCCA). (2011). Towards a framework for junior cycle. Retrieved October 1, 2013, from http://ncca.ie/framework/doc/NCCA-Junior-Cycle.pdf.

  • OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, J. R., & Andrews, K. (2005). E-portfolio for in-service teacher training: Beauty and thorn. Paper presented at the Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 1–5 May, Phoenix, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachler, N., & Daly, C. (2011). Key issues in e-learning: Research and practice. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., Dunne, A., Darmody, M., & McCoy, S. (2007). Gearing up for the exam?: The experience of junior certificate students. Dublin: Liffey Press in association with the ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., Dunne, A., McCoy, S., & Darmody, M. (2006). Pathways through the junior cycle: The experience of second year students. Dublin: Liffey Press in association with the ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., McCoy, S., & Darmody, M. (2004). Moving up. The experiences of first-year students in post-primary education. Dublin: Liffey Press in association with the ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2010). National educational technology plan. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010.

  • Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Bridges, S. (2007). Evaluation study report. In DEEWR and DETA, Meeting in the Middle - Assessment, Pedagogy, Learning and Educational Disadvantage. Literacy and Numeracy in the Middle Years of Schooling Initiative - Strand A. Project Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved January 29, 2016, from http://education.qld.gov.au/literacy/docs/deewr-myp-final-report.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Murray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murray, B., Tuohy, S. (2017). EUFolio: A Classroom ePortfolio Pilot Project. In: Marcus-Quinn, A., Hourigan, T. (eds) Handbook on Digital Learning for K-12 Schools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33806-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33808-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics