Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Network Science to Support Design Research: From Counting to Connecting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Experimental Design Research

Abstract

A network-based perspective on designing permits research on the complexity of product, process, and people interactions. Strengthened by the latest advances in information technologies and accessibility of data, a network-based perspective and use of appropriate network analysis metrics, theories, and tools allow us to explore new data-driven research approaches in design. These approaches allow us to move from counting to connecting, meaning to explicitly link disconnected pieces of data, information, and knowledge, and thus to answer far-reaching research questions with strong industrial and societal impact. This chapter contributes to the use of network science in empirical studies of design organisations. It focuses on introducing a network-based perspective on the design process and in particular on making use of network science to support design research and practice. The main contribution of this chapter is an overview of the methodological challenges and core decision points when embarking on network-based design research, namely defining the overall research purpose and selecting network features. We furthermore highlight the potential for using archival data, the opportunities for navigating different levels of the design process that network analysis permits, what we here call zooming in and out, and the use of network visualisations. We illustrate the main points with a case from our own research on engineering communication networks. In this case, we have used more than three years of archival data, including design activity logs and work-related email exchanges from a recently completed large-scale engineering systems project of designing and developing a renewable power plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahn Y-Y, Bagrow JP, Lehmann S (2010) Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature 466:761–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert R, Barabási A-L (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TJ (1977) Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the r&d organization. The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin C, MacCormack A, Rusnak J (2013) Hidden structure: using network methods to map system architecture (No. 13-093). Harvard Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási A (2012) Network science. BarabasiLab, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media

    Google Scholar 

  • Batallas DA, Yassine AA (2006) Information leaders in product development organizational networks: social network analysis of the design structure matrix. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 53:570–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S, Foster P (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. J Manage 29:991–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S, Halgin DS (2011) On network theory. Organ Sci 22:1168–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. SAGE Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Braha D, Bar-Yam Y (2007) The statistical mechanics of complex product development: empirical and analytical results. Manag Sci 53:1127–1145

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad Manag J 47:795–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning TR, Eppinger SD (2002) Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49:428–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvano CN, John P (2004) Systems engineering in an age of complexity. Syst Eng 7:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S (2005) Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cash P, Culley S (2014) The role of experimental studies in design research. In: Rodgers P, Yee J (eds) Routledge companion to design research. Routledge, pp 175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis N, Fowler JH (2011) Connected: the surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Back Bay Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins ST, Bradley J, Yassine AA (2010) Analyzing product development task networks to examine organizational change. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 57:513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diestel R (2005) Graph theory. Springer, Berlin [etc.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Durugbo C, Hutabarat W, Tiwari A, Alcock JR (2011) Modelling collaboration using complex networks. Inf Sci (Ny) 181:3143–3161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert CM, Maier AM, McMahon C (2005) Communication in design. In: Clarkson J, Eckert C (eds) Design process improvement: a review of current practice. Springer, Cambridge, pp 233–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger SD, Browning TR (2012) Design structure matrix methods and applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger SD, Salminen V (2001) Patterns of product development interactions. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on engineering design (ICED 2001). Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger SD, Joglekar NR, Olechowski A, Teo T (2014) Improving the systems engineering process with multilevel analysis of interactions. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 28:323–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada E (2013) Graph and network theory in physics. University of Strathclyde, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Giffin M, de Weck OL, Bounova G, Keller R, Eckert C, Clarkson PJ (2009) Change propagation analysis in complex technical systems. J Mech Des 131:081001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokpinar B, Hopp W, Iravani S (2010) The impact of misalignment of organizational structure and product architecture on quality in complex product development. Manag Sci 56:468–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme P, Saramäki J (2012) Temporal networks. Phys Rep 519:97–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J (2005) Complexity science in collaborative design. CoDesign 1:223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivelä M, Arenas A, Barthelemy M, Gleeson JP, Moreno Y, Porter MA (2013) Multilayer networks (physics and society). arXiv, eprint arXiv:1309.7233. arXiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimeyer M, Lindemann U (2011) Complexity metrics in engineering design: managing the structure of design processes. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann U, Maurer MS, Braun T (2009) Structural complexity management. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ma’ayan A (2012) New frontiers of network analysis in systems biology. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maier AM, Kreimeyer M, Hepperle C, Eckert CM, Lindemann U, Clarkson PJ (2008) Exploration of correlations between factors influencing communication in complex product development. Concurr Eng 16:37–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier C, Yassine AA, Browning TR (2007) Design process sequencing with competent genetic algorithms. J Mech Des 129:566–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moliterno TP, Mahony DM (2011) Network theory of organization: a multilevel approach. J Manag 37:443–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelli MD, Eppinger SD, Gulati RK (1995) Predicting technical communication in product development organizations. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag 42:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Parraguez P (2015) A networked perspective on the engineering design process: at the intersection of process and organisation architectures. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Parraguez P, Maier AM (2015) Unfolding the design process architecture: a networked perspective on activities. In: International conference on engineering design 2015 (ICED 2015), Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Parraguez P, Eppinger SD, Maier AM (2014) Evolution of information control and centralisation through stages of complex engineering design projects. In: Dorian M, Mario S, Neven P, Nenad B (eds) Proceedings of DESIGN 2014, the 13th international design conference, Dubrovnik

    Google Scholar 

  • Parraguez P, Eppinger SD, Maier AM (2015a) Information flow through stages of complex engineering design projects: a dynamic network analysis approach. IEEE Trans Eng Manag

    Google Scholar 

  • Parraguez P, Eppinger SD, Maier AM (2015b) Characterising design process interfaces as organisation networks: insights for engineering systems management. Syst Eng (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasqual MC, de Weck O (2011) Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation. Res Eng Des 23:305–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharman DM, Yassine AA (2004) Characterizing complex product architectures. Syst Eng 7:35–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106:467–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R, Eppinger SD (1997) A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design. Manag Sci 43:1104–1120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald DH (1996) Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Des Stud 17:277–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa ME (2010) Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ Sci 22:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa ME (2014) Realizing the need for rework: from task interdependence to social networks. Prod Oper Manag 23:1312–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM (2007) A network approach to define modularity of components in complex products. J Mech Des 129:1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa ME, Mihm J, Browning TR (2011) Degree distribution and quality in complex engineered systems. J Mech Des 133

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward DV (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 28:71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storga M, Stankovic T, Cash P, McAloone TC (2013) Visually augmented analysis of socio-technical networks in engineering systems design research. In: Proceedings of TFTD13, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410:268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vespignani A (2009) Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems. Science (80-.) 325:425–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn DC, Caldwell NH, Clarkson PJ (2014) Predicting change propagation in complex design workflows. J. Mech, Des 136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DTU Management Engineering, Engineering Systems Division, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Building 424, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark

    Pedro Parraguez & Anja Maier

Authors
  1. Pedro Parraguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anja Maier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Parraguez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

    Philip Cash

  2. Swiss Federal Institute of Tech. Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Tino Stanković

  3. University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    Mario Å torga

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parraguez, P., Maier, A. (2016). Using Network Science to Support Design Research: From Counting to Connecting. In: Cash, P., Stanković, T., Štorga, M. (eds) Experimental Design Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33781-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33781-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33779-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33781-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation