Skip to main content
Log in

Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A pervasive problem for engineering change management is the phenomenon of change propagation by which a change to one part or element of a design requires additional changes throughout the product. This paper introduces a multilayer network model integrating three coupled layers, or domains, of product development that contribute to change propagation: namely, the product layer, change layer, and social layer. The model constitutes a holistic, data-driven approach to the analysis and management of change propagation. A baseline repository of tools and metrics is developed for the analysis and management of change propagation using the model. The repository includes a few novel tools and metrics, most notably the Engineer Change Propagation Index (Engineer-CPI) and Propagation Directness (PD), as well as others already existing in the literature. As such, the multilayer network model unifies previous research on change propagation in a comprehensive paradigm. A case study of a large technical program, which managed over 41,000 change requests in 8 years, is employed to demonstrate the model’s practical utility. Most significantly, the case study explores the program’s social layer and discovers a correspondence between the propagation effects of an engineer’s work and factors such as his/her organizational role and the context of his/her assignments. The study also reveals that parent–child propagation often spanned two or more product interfaces, thus confirming the counterintuitive possibility of indirect propagation between nonadjacent product components or subsystems. Finally, the study finds that most changes did not lead to any propagation. Propagation that did occur always stopped after five, and rarely more than four, generations of descendants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Otherwise it can be confusing whether the term “propagation” refers to a single instance or repeated instances of parent–child propagation.

  2. Giffin et al. (2009) actually name this tool the Change DSM or DDSM, but this paper substitutes the word “propagation” for “change” to help distinguish it from a DSM used to represent a change network.

Abbreviations

CAI:

Change Acceptance Index

CPI:

Change Propagation Index

CPM:

Change Prediction Method

CR:

Change request

CRI:

Change Reflection Index

DMM:

Domain Mapping Matrix

DSM:

Design Structure Matrix

ECM:

Engineering change management

ESM:

Engineering Systems Matrix

IPT:

Integrated program team

PAR:

Proposal Acceptance Rate

PD:

Propagation Directness

PDSM:

Propagation Design Structure Matrix

SAP:

System Adjustable Parameter

References

  • Bartolomei J (2007) Qualitative knowledge construction for engineering systems: extending the design structure matrix methodology in scope and procedure. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Browning TR (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48(3):292–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PJ, Simons C, Eckert C (2004) Predicting change propagation in complex design. Trans ASME 126:788–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Danilovic M, Browning TR (2007) Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. Int J Manag 25:300–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Diestel R (2005) Graph theory, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Earl C, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2005) Design change and complexity. In: 2nd workshop on complexity in design and engineering

  • Eckert C, Clarkson P, Zanker W (2004) Change and customization in complex engineering domains. Res Eng Design 15:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger SD (2001) Patterns of product development interactions. In: 13th international conference on engineering design

  • Eppinger S, Whitney D, Smith R, Gebala D (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res Eng Design 6(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giffin M (2007) Change propagation in large technical systems. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Giffin M, de Weck O, Bounova G, Keller R, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2009) Change propagation analysis in complex technical systems. J Mech Des 131(8):081010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GQ, Mak KL (1999) Current practices of engineering change management in UK manufacturing industries. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarratt T, Eckert C, Clarkson J (2006) Pitfalls of engineering change: change practice during complex product design. Adv Des 413–424

  • Keller R, Eger T, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2005) Visualizing change propagation. In: 15th international conference on engineering design, pp 62–63

  • Morelli MD, Eppinger SD, Gulati RK (1995) Predicting technical communication in product development organizations. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 42(2):215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.A.S.A. (2007) NASA systems engineering handbook. SP-2007-6105 R1

  • Newman J (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. Soc Ind Appl Math 42(2):167–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols K (1990) Getting engineering changes under control. J Eng Des 1(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pikosz P, Malmqvist J (1998) A comparative study of engineering change management in three Swedish companies. In: Proceedings of the DETC98 ASME design engineering technical conference, pp 78–85

  • Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM (2000) Understanding the effects of product architecture on technical communication in product development organizations. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4130

  • Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Rowles CM (2007) Are your engineers talking to one another when they should? Harvard Bus Rev 85(11):133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward DV (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 28(3):71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh ES, de Weck OL (2007) Flexible product platforms: framework and case study. Res Eng Design 18(2):67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwiesch C, Loch C (1999) Managing the process of engineering change orders: the case of the climate control system in automobile development. J Prod Innov Manag 16:160–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IC (1997) A review of research into engineering change management: implications for product design. Des Stud 18:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Excerpts and figures from this paper were previously published by the Design Society in: Pasqual, MC, de Weck, OL (2011) Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, pp 126–138.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Pasqual.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pasqual, M.C., de Weck, O.L. Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation. Res Eng Design 23, 305–328 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-011-0125-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-011-0125-6

Keywords

Navigation