Abstract
Researchers face multiple challenges when studying the cost of producing higher education, which has led many to avoid the topic altogether. As a result, higher education scholarship provides little guidance to institutional leaders aiming to reduce costs in response to financial difficulties. To encourage greater research in this area, we review prominent cost theories, examine empirical research into costs, and explore specific policies that alter costs within colleges and universities. Our theoretical overview focuses on the cost disease, the revenue theory of costs, positional arms races, and the principal-agent problem to explain cost increases within higher education. Our discussion of empirical research is organized around Brinkman’s (Higher education cost functions. In: Hoenack SA, Collins EL (eds) The economics of American universities: management, operations, and fiscal environment. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 107–128, 1990) five major determinants of costs: size, scope, level of instruction, discipline, and revenues. When examining institutional policies, we discuss instructional activities and non-instructional activities separately. For instructional costs, we focus our attention on how faculty composition and instructional technology alter costs in higher education. The discussion of non-instructional costs examines how costs can be decreased through reducing scope, increasing economies of scale, eliminating the cost disease, and altering incentives. We conclude the chapter by describing several promising areas for future research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agasisti, T., & Belfield, C. (2014). Efficiency in the community college sector: Stochastic frontier analysis (CCRC Working Paper No. 69). New York, NY: Columbia University.
Agasisti, T., Dal Bianco, A., Landoni, P., Sala, A., & Salerno, M. (2011). Evaluating the efficiency of research in academic departments: An empirical analysis in an Italian region. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267–289.
Agasisti, T., & Johnes, G. (2015). Efficiency, costs, rankings and heterogeneity: The case of US higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 60–82.
Agasisti, T., & Pohl, C. (2012). Comparing German and Italian public universities: Convergence or divergence in the higher education landscape? Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(2), 71–85.
Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2008). Graduation rates and accountability: Regressions versus production frontiers. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 80–100.
Archibald, R., & Feldman, D. (2011). Why does college cost so much? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Auguste, B. G., Cota, A., Jayaram, K., & Laboissiere, M. C. (2010). Winning by degrees: The strategies of highly productive higher-education institutions. Retrieved from http://mckinseyonsociety.com/winning-by-degrees/
Baldwin, R., & Chronister, J. (2001). Teaching without tenure: Policies and practices for a new era. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Barnshaw, J., & Dunietz, S. (2015). Busting the myths: The annual report on the economic status of the profession, 2014–15. Academe, 101(2), 4–37.
Baumol, W., & Bowen, W. (1966). Performing arts—The economic dilemma: A study of problems common to theater, opera, music, and dance. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., Willig, R. D., Bailey, E. E., Fischer, D., & Fischer, D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Belfield, C., Crosta, P., & Jenkins, D. (2014). Can community colleges afford to improve completion? Measuring the cost and efficiency consequences of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(3), 327–345.
Bettinger, E., & Long, T. L. (2005). Help or hinder? Adjunct professors and student outcomes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 2004(127), 5–22.
Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2014). Efficiency and economies of scale and scope in European universities. A directional distance approach (No. 2014–08). Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita’degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”.
Bowen, H. (1980). The cost of higher education: How much do colleges and universities spend per student and how much should they spend? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bowen, W. (2013). Higher education in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bowen, W., Chingos, M., Lack, K., & Nygren, T. (2012). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from randomized trials. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R.
Breneman, D. (1994). Liberal arts colleges: Thriving, surviving, or endangered? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Breneman, D. (2001). An essay on college costs. In Study of college costs and prices, 1988–89 to 1997–98 (Commissioned Papers, Vol. 2, pp. 13–20). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Brinkman, P. T. (1990). Higher education cost functions. In S. A. Hoenack & E. L. Collins (Eds.), The economics of American universities: management, operations, and fiscal environment (pp. 107–128). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Brinkman, P., & Leslie, L. (1986). Economies of scale in higher education: Sixty years of research. The Review of Higher Education, 10(1), 1–28.
Callie, T., & Cheslock, J. (2008). The hiring and compensation practices of business school deans. The Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 25–49.
Carey, K. (2015). The end of college: Creating the future of learning and the university of everywhere. New York: Riverhead Books.
Cheslock, J. (2015). The financial crisis. In T. Ream & J. Braxton (Eds.), Cracked, not shattered: Ernest L. Boyer’s hope for today’s universities (pp. 1–22). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Cheslock, J., & Gianneschi, M. (2008). Replacing state appropriations with alternative revenue sources: The case of voluntary support. Journal of Higher Education, 79(2), 208–229.
Cheslock, J., & Knight, D. (2015). Diverging revenues, cascading expenditures, and ensuing subsidies: The unbalanced and growing strain of intercollegiate athletics on universities and their students. Journal of Higher Education, 86(3), 417–447.
Christensen, C., & Eyring, H. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
Cohn, E., Rhine, S., & Santos, M. (1989). Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: Economies of scale and scope. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 284–290.
Cowen, T., & Tabarrok, A. (2014). The industrial organization of online education. American Economic Review, 104(5), 519–522.
Daghbashyan, Z. (2011). The economic efficiency of Swedish higher education institutions (No. 245). Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. K. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of organizational life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
De Groot, H., McMahon, W. W., & Volkwein, J. F. (1991). The cost structure of American research universities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 424–431.
Denneen, J., & Dretler, T. (2012). The financially sustainable university.Retrieved from: http://www.bain.com/Images/BAIN_BRIEF_The_financially_sustainable_university.pdf.
Desrochers, D., & Kirshstein, R. (2014). Labor intensive or labor expensive? Changing staffing and compensation patterns in higher education. Washington, DC: American Institutes of Research.
Desrochers, D., & Hurlburt, S. (2014). Trends in college spending: 2001–2011. Delta Cost Project at American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from www.deltacostproject.org
Dickeson, R. C. (2010). Prioritizing academic programs and services: Reallocating resources to achieve strategic balance. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(April), 147–160.
Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1995). Departmental productivity in American universities: Economies of scale and scope. Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 119–144.
Ehrenberg, R. (2000). Tuition rising: Why college costs so much. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Zhang, L. (2005). Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? Journal of Human Resources, 40(4), 647–659.
Ehrenberg, R., & Zhang, L. (2004). The changing nature of faculty employment (Cornell Higher Education Research Institute Working Paper No. 44). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute.
Fain, P. (2014, May 6). Competency and affordability. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/05/06/college-america-hits-10000-mark-new-competency-based-bachelors-degrees#ixzz30vhhtZ2q
Figlio, D. N., Schapiro, M. O., & Soter, K. G. (2013). Are tenure track professors better teachers? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Frank, R. (2004). Challenging the myth: A review of the links among college athletic success, student quality, and donations. Paper commissioned by the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics.
Gappa, J., & Leslie, D. (1993). The invisible faculty: Improving the status of part-timers in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Geiger, R. L., & Heller, D. E. (2011). Financial trends in higher education: The United States. Peking University Education Review, 1(33), 6.
Griffiths, R., Chingos, M., Mulhern, C., & Spies, R. (2014). Interactive online learning on campus: Testing MOOCs and other platforms in hybrid formats in the university system of Maryland. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R.
Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.
Harris, D. (2009). Toward policy-relevant benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes: Combining effects with costs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(1), 3–29.
Harris, D. & Goldrick-Rab, S. (2009). The (un)productivity of American higher education: From “cost disease” to cost-effectiveness. La Follette School Working Paper No. 2010–023.
Hovey, H. (1999). State spending for higher education in the next decade: The battle to sustain current support. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education Report Number 99–3.
Jaquette, O., & Parra, E. (2014). Using IPEDS for panel analyses: Core concepts, data challenges, and empirical applications. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 29). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Johnes, G., & Schwarzenberger, A. (2011). Differences in cost structure and the evaluation of efficiency: The case of German universities. Education Economics, 19(5), 487–499.
Johnes, J. (2006). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 273–288.
Johnes, J. (2014). Efficiency and mergers in English higher education 1996/97 to 2008/9: Parametric and non‐parametric estimation of the multi‐input multi‐output distance function. The Manchester School, 82(4), 465–487.
Kane, T., Orszag, P., & Gunter, D. (2003). State fiscal constraints and higher education spending: The role of Medicaid and the business cycle. Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Discussion Paper Number 11.
Kaplan, S., & Henderson, R. (2005). Inertia and incentives: Bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organization Science, 16(5), 509–521.
Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 769–783.
Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (2015). Adapting by design. Delphi project on the changing faculty and student success. Retrieved from http://www.uscrossier.org/pullias/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DELPHI-PROJECT_ADAPTING-BY-DESIGN.pdf
Kiley, K. (2013, January 17). Nowhere to turn. Inside Higher Ed. January 17. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/01/17/moodys-report-calls-question-all-traditional-university-revenue-sources
Kirshstein, R., & Kadamus, J. (2012). Climbing walls and climbing tuition. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Kolowich, S. (2014, September 30). What you need to know about companies that run online programs for colleges. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/What-You-Need-to-Know-About/149075/
Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (1999). Economies of scale and scope in higher education: A case of comprehensive universities. Economics of Education Review, 18(2), 269–277.
Koshal, R. K., Koshal, M., & Gupta, A. (2001). Multi-product total cost function for higher education: A case of bible colleges. Economics of Education Review, 20(3), 297–303.
Kulshreshtha, P., & Nayak, T. K. (2015). Efficiency of higher technical educational institutions in India. Archives of Business Research, 3(1), 94–122.
Laband, D. N., & Lentz, B. F. (2004). Do costs differ between for-profit and not-for-profit producers of higher education? Research in Higher Education, 45(4), 429–441.
Lane, J. E., & Kivisto, J. A. (2008). Interests, information and incentives in higher education: Principal-agent theory and its potential applications to the study of higher education governance. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXI, pp. 141–180). New York: Agathon Press.
Leslie, L., Oaxaca, R., & Rhoades, G. (2012). Revenue flux and university behavior. In D. Priest, W. Becker, D. Hossler, & E. S. John (Eds.), Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities (pp. 55–91). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Leslie, L. L., Slaughter, S., Taylor, B. J., & Zhang, L. (2012). How do revenue variations affect expenditures within US research universities? Research in Higher Education, 53(6), 614–639.
Leslie, L., & Rhoades, G. (1995). Rising administrative costs: On seeking explanations. Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 187–212.
Lewis, D. R., & Dundar, H. (1999). Costs and productivity in higher education: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 39–102). Springer: New York.
Mamun, S. A. K. (2012). Stochastic estimation of cost frontier: Evidence from Bangladesh. Education Economics, 20(2), 211–227.
Mankiw, G. (2014). Principles of economics (7th ed.). New York: Southwestern College Publishing.
Martin, R. (2011). The college cost disease: Higher cost and lower quality. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Massy, W. F., & Zemsky, R. (1994). Faculty discretionary time. Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 1–22.
Meyer, K. A. (2006). Cost-efficiencies of online learning. ASHE Higher Education Report Series, 32(1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Middaugh, M. F. (2001). Understanding Faculty Productivity: Standards and Benchmarks for Colleges and Universities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Miller, B. (2010). The course of innovation: Using technology to transform higher education. Education Sector.
Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777.
Monks, J. (2007). The relative earnings of contingent faculty in higher education. Journal of Labor Research, 28, 487–501.
Morris, D. (2008). Economies of scale and scope in e-learning. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 331–343.
National Research Council. (2012). Improving measurement of productivity in higher education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nemoto, J., & Furumatsu, N. (2014). Scale and scope economies of Japanese private universities revisited with an input distance function approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41(2), 213–226.
Olivares, M., & Wetzel, H. (2011). Competing in the higher education market: Empirical evidence for economies of scale and scope in German higher education institutions. CESifo Economic Studies, 60(4), 653–680.
Pew Higher Education Research Program. (1990). The lattice and the ratchet. Policy Perspectives, 2(4), 1–8.
Priest, D., Becker, W., Hossler, D., & St. John, E. (2002). Incentive-based budgeting systems in public universities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Ream, T., & Braxton, J. (2015). Ernest L. Boyer: Hope for today’s universities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Redd, K. (2000). Discounting towards disaster: Tuition discounting, college finances, and employment of low-income undergraduates. New Agenda Series, 32(2). Indianapolis, IN: USA Group Foundation.
Rivard, R. (2013, November 21). Shared services backlash. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/11/21/u-michigan-tries-save-money-staff-costs-meets-faculty-opposition
Robst, J. (2001). Cost efficiency in public higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 72(6), 730–750.
Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.
Sav, G. T. (2004). Higher education costs and scale and scope economies. Applied Economics, 36(6), 607–614.
Sav, G. T. (2012a). Managing operating efficiencies of publicly owned universities: American university stochastic frontier estimates using panel data. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 2(1), 1–23.
Sav, G. T. (2012b). Cost inefficiencies and rankings of Ivy Universities: Stochastic panel estimates. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(3), 3.
Sav, G. T. (2012c). For-profit college entry and cost efficiency: Stochastic frontier estimates vs two-year public and non-profit colleges. International Business Research, 5(3), 26.
Sav, G. T. (2012d). Minority serving college and university cost efficiencies. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 54.
Schuster, J. H., & Finkelstein, M. J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
State Budget Crisis Task Force. (2012). Report of the state budget crisis task force. New York: State Budget Crisis Task Force.
Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2011). Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: A DEA analysis&star. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1282–1297.
Toutkoushian, R. K. (2001). Trends in revenues and expenditures for public and private higher education. The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice, 11, 38.
Varian, H. (2009). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach (8th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Weimer, D. L. (2009). Making education research more policy-analytic. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 93–100). New York: Routledge.
Winston, G. C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchies, and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.
Zhang, L., & Liu, X. (2010). Faculty employment at 4-year colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 29(4), 543–552.
Zoghbi, A. C., Rocha, F., & Mattos, E. (2013). Education production efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian universities. Economic Modelling, 31, 94–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheslock, J.J., Ortagus, J.C., Umbricht, M.R., Wymore, J. (2016). The Cost of Producing Higher Education: An Exploration of Theory, Evidence, and Institutional Policy. In: Paulsen, M. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26828-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26829-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)