Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Clinical Hypertension and Vascular Diseases ((CHVD))

Abstract

The diagnosis and management of hypertension is dependent on the accuracy of blood pressure measurement which, in turn, demands that the devices used for measurement are accurate. Regrettably, this is often not the case and there is a need, therefore, for validation procedures to ensure that devices on the market are accurate and reliable. All aspects of blood pressure device validation are reviewed in this chapter. The different validation protocols and their development are outlined, namely the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the International Standards Organisation (ISO) standards, the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocols and the International Protocols of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). The ways in which these protocols might be harmonised and improved is discussed. Manufacturer obligations and consumer requirements are given thoughtful consideration, and finally, the need for a unified approach to the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices is emphasised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. O’Brien E, Fitzgerald D. The history of indirect blood pressure measurement. In: O’Brien E, O’Malley K, Birkenhager WH, Reid JL, editors. Blood pressure measurement. Handbook of hypertension. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1991. p. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fitzgerald D, O’Callaghan W, O’Malley K, O’Brien E. Inaccuracy of the London School of Hygiene Sphygmomanometer. Br Med J. 1982;284:18–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O’Malley K. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1990;336:1465–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgerald D, O’Callaghan WG, McQuaid R, O’Malley K, O’Brien E. Accuracy and reliability of two ambulatory blood pressure recorders: Remler M 2000 and cardiodyne sphygmology. Br Heart J. 1982;48:572–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O’Malley K. Keep blood pressure Down. WHICH? Magazine. August 1989. p. 372–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O’Malley K. Inaccuracy of seven popular sphygmomanometers for home-measurement of blood pressure. J Hypertens. 1990;8:621–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Brien E, O’Malley K, Sheridan J. The need for a standardized protocol for validating noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 1989;7 (suppl 3):S19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. American National Standards Institute, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. ANSI/AAMI SP10-1987, Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington: AAMI; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. American National Standards Institute, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. ANSI/AAMI SP10-1992, electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington: AAMI; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. American National Standards Institute, ANSI/AAMI SP10-1992/A1, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington: AAMI; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. American National Standards Institute, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. ANSI/AAMI SP10-2002 & SP10-2002/A1, Manual, electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington: AAMI; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, American National Standards Institute, International Organization for Standardization. AAMI/ANSI/ISO 81060-1:2007/(R)2013, Non-invasive sphygmomanometers—Part 1: Requirements and test methods for non-automated measurement type. Geneva: AAMI; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American National Standards Institute, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, International Electrotechnical Commission. ANSI/AAMI/IEC 80601-2-30:2009 & A1:2013, Medical electrical equipment—Part 2-30: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of automated type non-invasive sphygmomanometers and Amendment 1. Geneva: IEC Central Office; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, American National Standards Institute, International Organization for Standardization. AAMI/ANSI/ISO 81060-2:2013, non-invasive sphygmomanometers—Part 2: Clinical investigation of automated measurement type. Geneva: AAMI; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Brien E, Petrie L, Littler WA, et al. British Hypertension Protocol: Evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens. 1990;8:607–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Atkins N, O’Brien E, Mee F, O’Malley K. The relative accuracy of simultaneous same arm, simultaneous opposite arm and sequential same arm measurements in the validation of automated blood pressure measuring devices. J Hum Hypertens. 1990;4:647–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA, et al. The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 1993;11 (suppl 2):S43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O’Malley K, Tan S. Training and assessment of observers for blood pressure measurement in hypertension research. J Hum Hypertens. 1991;5:7–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jamieson M, Petrie J, O'Brien E, Padfield P, Littler WA, De Swiet M. Blood Pressure Measurement. London: Video for the British Hypertension Society, distributed by British Medical Journal Publications; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, on behalf of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension, et al. International protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2002;7:3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Brien E, Atkins N. Validation and reliability of blood pressure monitors. In: White W, editor. Blood pressure monitoring in cardiovascular medicine and therapeutics. Totowa: Humana; 2007. p. 97–132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Brien E, Stergiou G. Who will bell the cat? A call for a new approach for validating blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens. 2010;28:2378–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerin W, Schwartz AR, Schwartz JE, et al. Limitations of current validation protocols for home blood pressure monitors for individual patients. Blood Press Monit. 2002;7:313–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Brien E, Atkins N, Stergiou G, on behalf of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension, et al. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults: 2010 revision. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15:23–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stergiou G, Karpettas N, Atkins N, O’Brien E. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for the validation of blood pressure monitors: A critical review of its application and rationale for revision. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15:39–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Keary L, Atkins N, O’Brien E. Terminal digit preference and heaping in blood pressure measurement. J Hum Hypertens. 1998;12:787–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stergiou GS, Karpettas N, Atkins N, O’Brien E. Impact of applying the more stringent validation criteria of the revised European Society of Hypertension International Protocol 2010 on earlier validation studies. Blood Press Monit. 2011;16:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ng KG. Clinical validation protocols for noninvasive blood pressure monitors and their recognition by regulatory authorities and professional organizations: rationale and considerations for a single unified protocol or standard. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18(5):282–9. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283624b3b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. dabl Educational Trust [Internet]. Dublin: dabl Educational Trust; 2006 [Updated 2015 Feb 19; Cited 2015 Mar 9] Available from: www.dableducational.org.

  30. Atkins N, O’Brien E. The dabl®Educational Trust device equivalence procedure. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12:245–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Turner MJ. Can we trust automatic sphygmomanometer validations? J Hypertens. 2010;28:2353–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. International Organization for Standardization, International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 17025:2005, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  33. International Organization for Standardization, International Electrotechnical Commission. ISO/IEC 9001:2008, Quality management systems—requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Caulfield M, Heagerty T, Ian Wilkinson I, et al on behalf of the BHS Strategic Review Group. British Hypertension Society Strategic Review 2010-2016 [Internet]. Leicester, UK: BHS; 2009. 20 p. [Cited 2015 Mar 19] Available from: www.bhsoc.org/pdfs/BHS%20Strategic%20Review%202009.pdf.

  35. O’Brien E, Atkins N, Mee F, Coyle D, Syed S. A new audio-visual technique for recording blood pressure in research: the Sphygmocorder. J Hypertens. 1995;13:1734–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Atkins N, O’Brien E, Wesseling KH, Guelen I. Increasing observer objectivity with audio-visual technology: the Sphygmocorder. Blood Press Monit. 1997;2:269–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee J, Park D, Oh H, Kim I, Shen D, Chee Y. Digital recording system of sphygmomanometry. Blood Press Monit. 2009;14(2):77–81. doi:10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283262f45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. IEEE Xplore Digital Library. P1708/D02, Aug 2013—IEEE Draft Standard for Wearable Cuffless Blood Pressure Measuring Devices [Internet]. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers [Cited 2015 Mar 12] Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6626346&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2FielD%2F6626344%2F6626345%2F06626346

  39. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60601-1, Medical electrical equipment—Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC Central Office; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  40. O’Brien E, Atkins N. A comparison of the BHS and AAMI protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: can the two be reconciled? J Hypertens. 1994;12:1089–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc. 1949;44:335–41. doi:10.2307/2280232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lu W, Li H, Tao S, et al. Research on the main elements influencing blood pressure measurement by pulse wave velocity. Front Med Biol Eng. 1992;4(3):189–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Siebenhofer A, Kemp C, Sutton A, Williams B. The reproducibility of central aortic blood pressure measurements in healthy subjects using applanation tonometry and sphygmocardiography. J Hum Hypertens. 1999;13(9):625–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Laurent C, Jönsson B, Vegfors M, Lindberg LG. Non-invasive measurement of systolic blood pressure on the arm utilizing photoplethysmography: development of the methodology. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005;43:131–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eoin O’Brien M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Observer Blinding During Validation Procedure

Appendix: Observer Blinding During Validation Procedure

This appendix provides a generalised description of the observer blinding procedure required during validation. It is an adaptation of the method described for observer training in the 1990 BHS protocol [15], the 1993 BHS protocol [17] and the 2002 ESH-IP [20].

Observer Isolation

The observers and supervisor are seated at a bench fitted with partitions so that each is isolated from each other in a “booth”. It must not be possible for an observer to have any indication of any blood pressure measurement other than by viewing his/her mercury column and listening with his/her own headset.

Booth Contents

The only objects in the observer booths are a mercury column (or other reference device), a stethoscope headset, two pens (one spare) and prepared forms to write down the observed measurements.

The supervisor booth will have space for both the supervisor and the subject. It will contain a mercury column (or other reference device), a full stethoscope, cuffs, an inflation bulb, the test device, two pens (one spare) and prepared forms.

The Pneumatic System

For sequential same-arm measurements and simultaneous opposite-arm measurements, all of the mercury columns and inflation bulb and a facility to connect a cuff are appropriate to the subject. This will not be a cuff supplied with the test device.

For simultaneous same-arm measurements, all of the mercury columns are connected to the device pneumatic system. The cuff used will be the appropriate cuff for the subject as supplied with the test device.

The system must be closed, and regardless of whether inflation and deflation are controlled by a bulb or by the test device, the system must be calibrated to test for air leaks and for stability.

The Auscultatory System

All of the stethoscope headsets must be connected to the one diaphragm. The lengths of tubing to each of the observer headsets must be the same. The system must be tested to ensure that Korotkov sounds are audible clearly on each headset.

Subject Forms

For the ESH-IP, supervisors must use the Subject Form as published. A similar form should be prepared, containing spaces for all subject details required, including observer measurements, for validations carried out according to the AAMI/ANSI/ISO standard.

Observer forms must contain a space for the subject number, spaces for the measurements and possible repeat measurements. For example, for the ESH-IP protocol, observers will record measurements A, 1, 3, 5 and 7; for the AAMI/ANSI/ISO standard with simultaneous same-arm measurements, observers will record an entry measurement and measurements 1, 2 and 3.

Procedure for Each Subject

After each observer reading, the supervisor checks the observers’ readings and, if they differ by at most 4 mmHg for both SBP and DBP, the supervisor simply states “OK” and continues. If not, the supervisor simply states “Repeat measurement n”, n being the number of the respective measurement. If there are three consecutive repeat measurement or mmm repeat measurements on the same subject, the supervisor simply states “OK” but the subject is excluded.

When the all measurements have been completed on the subject, the supervisor collects the forms and enters the observer measurements on the supervisor form. The forms are stapled together, in the order of Supervisor, Observer 1 and Observer 2. After entry into a computer, they are stored as evidence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Atkins, N., O’Brien, E. (2016). Validation and Reliability Testing of Blood Pressure Monitors. In: White, W. (eds) Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cardiovascular Medicine and Therapeutics. Clinical Hypertension and Vascular Diseases. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22771-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22771-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22770-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22771-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics