Abstract

Lifting is a common activity to below-knee amputees (BKA) in occupational and living occasions. Appropriate lifting posture is crucial to physical safety and health to those BKAs. Often healthy parts of BKAs might be hurt due to extra and asymmetric force exertion compensating for deficiency of disabled body parts. To prevent further hurt, a validated biomechanical model describing lifting is essential to analyze lifting behavior of those handicapped. In this study, twelve BKAs were recruited to lift 45 N weights from the floor. Subjects are asked to lift three levels of weights (0 N, 30 N, 60 N) by two postures: squat lifting and stoop lifting. Twelve non-BKAs were recruited as comparison group to study the variance caused by disability. Calculated forces based on Anybody were compared with EMG signals of body parts on spine and thigh. A framework of three-level constraints models were applied to adjust the difference between calculated forces and EMGs and the results validate the model.

Keywords

Below-knee Amputees Lifting Modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Hidalgo, J., Genaidy, A., Karwowski, W., et al.: A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation[J]. Ergonomics 40(9), 916–927 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, G.B.: Epidemiologic aspects on low-back pain in industry. Spine 6(1), 53–60 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoogendoorn, W.E., Bongers, P.M., de Vet, H.C., Douwes, M.B.W.: Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work at risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine 25, 3087–3092 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garg, A., Chaffin, D., Freivalds, A.: Biomechanical stresses from manual load lifting: a static vs dynamic evaluation[J]. IIE Trans. 14(4), 272–281 (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McGill, S.M., Hughson, R.L., Parks, K.: Changes in lumbar lordosis modify the role of the extensor muscles. Clin. Biomech. 15, 777–780 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garg, A., Herrin, G.D.: Stoop or squat, a biomechanical and metabolical evaluation. A.I.I.E Trans. 11, 293–302 (1979)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright, E.J., Haslam, R.A.: Manual handling risks and controls in a soft drinks distribution centre[J]. Appl. Ergon. 30(4), 311–318 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciriello, V.M., Snook, S.H.: Survey of manual handling tasks[J]. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 23(3), 149–156 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, Y.L.: Changes in lifting dynamics after localized arm fatigue[J]. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 25(6), 611–619 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thompson, D.D., Chaffin, D.B.: Can biomechanically determined stress be perceived? Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 37(10), 789–792 (1993). SAGE PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Rich, M., Shirazi-Adl, A., Arjmand, N.: Muscle activity, internal loads, and stability of the human spine in standing postures: combined model and in vivo studies[J]. Spine 29(23), 2633–2642 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnolgyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations