Abstract
In India, manual material handling (MMH) activities in asymmetrical postures are very common in the manufacturing industry and building construction sites. MMH involves any tasks that require a person to lift, lower, push, push, hold, or carry objects, vertically or horizontally, from one location to another with hands. These physical manual activities overtax the human musculoskeletal system, which may exceed workers’ physical limitations. The measurement of ground reaction forces (GRFs) shows a good measure of the musculoskeletal stresses being exerted on the workers performing such tasks. The research studies on the effect of vertical GRF and loading rate (LR) on the human body during running, walking, and jumping were well documented, but rarely have been used to evaluate lifting tasks. There is thus a need for a scientific study to investigate the effect of lifting task parameters and their interactions on the GRF and LR of workers in dynamic lifting human activities. This experimental study investigated the effect of lifting task parameters; lifting magnitude and lifting height based on subjective and biomechanical loading estimates. The subjective estimate was obtained using workload assessment by body discomfort chart. The biomechanical loading (loading rate) was calculated from GRF data, obtained using a force plate. Twelve male subjects in the age group of 20–25 years lifted containers of five different weights between 10 and 20 kg, from below knee height (origin) to various destination heights (below knee, knee, waist, shoulder, and ear level). In the experiment, the subjects were instructed to lift the weight in a 90° asymmetric posture using free-style lifting techniques. Both the task parameters, lifting weight and lifting heights, were observed to be significant. The results showed that vertical reaction forces increase when subjects lift the weight from the floor to ear height. It was also observed that the instantaneous loading rate increases with an increase in the level of lifting magnitude and lifting height; a significant extra loading rate is required to change the lower level of load and destination height to higher levels. Safe limits for significant factors are proposed to result in the optimal performance of the manual lifting task.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Khoshnevis B (2004) Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr 13(1):5–19
Ardiny H, Witwicki S, Mondada F (2015) Are autonomous mobile robots able to take over construction? A review. Int J Robot, Theory Appl 4(3):10–21
Everett JG (1999) Overexertion injuries in construction. J Constr Eng Manag 125(2):109–114
Boschman JS, Van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH (2012) Musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers: a one-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:1–196
Dai B, Jin S, Ning X, Mirka GA (2010) The effects of horizontal load speed and lifting frequency on lifting technique and biomechanics. Ergonomics 53(8):1024–1032
Gallagher S, Pollard J, Porter W (2011) Electromyography of the thigh muscles during lifting tasks in kneeling and squatting postures. Ergonomics 54(1):91–102
Murphy PL, Volinn E (1999) Is occupational low back pain on the rise? Spine 24(7):691–697
Kucera KL, Loomis D, Lipscomb HJ, Marshall SW, Mirka GA, Daniels JL (2009) Ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in North Carolina crab pot and gill net commercial fishermen. Am J Ind Med 52(4):311–321
Shirazi-Adl A (2006) Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element. J Biomech 39(2):267–275
Fathallah FA, Marras WS, Parnianpour M (1998) An assessment of complex spinal loads during dynamic lifting tasks. Spine 23(6):706–716
Andersson GBJ, Ortengren R, Schultz AB (1980) Analysis and measurement of the loads on the lumbar spine during work at a table. J. Biomechan 13(6):513–520
Kromodihardjo S, Mital A (1987) Biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks. J Biomech Engng 109:i32-138
McMullian D, Stobb T, Bang S, Goddard D, Han B, Simmers R (1995) Asymmetric loading on the body during symmetric lift. In: Advances in Industrial Ergonomics, and Safety VII, Taylor & Francis, pp 719–725
Tsuang YH, Cheng CK, Wang CL, Chen PQ, Hang YS, Liu TK (1995) The center of ground reaction force during lifting. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 19(1):54–57
Amadio AC, Lobo Da Costa PH, Sacco ICN, Serrao JC, Araujo RC, Mochizuki L (1999) Introduction to biomechanics for human movement analysis: description and application of measurement method. Brazilian J Phys Theor 3(2):41–54
Faber GS, Chang CC, Kingma I, Dennerlein JT (2013) Estimating dynamic external hand forces during manual materials handling based on ground reaction forces and body segment accelerations. J Biomech 46(15):273640
Jena S, Sakhare GM, Panda SK, Thirugnanam A (2017) Evaluation and prediction of human gait parameters using univariate, multivariate and stepwise statistical methods. J Mech Med Biol 17(05):1750076
Sauter SL, Schleifer LM, Knutson SJ (1991) Work posture, work station design and musculoskeletal discomfort in a VDT data entry task. Hum Factors 33(2):151–167
Singh R, Batish A, Singh TP (2014) Determination of safe limits of significant task parameters during manual lifting. Workplace Health Safety 62(4):150–160
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2004) Occupational Ill Health Statistics Updated
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vijaywargiya, A., Bhiwapurkar, M., Thirugnanam, A. (2022). Effect of Lifting Height and Weight Magnitude on Biomechanical Loading During Manual Lifting. In: Rana, N.K., Shah, A.A., Iqbal, R., Khanzode, V. (eds) Technology Enabled Ergonomic Design. HWWE 2020. Design Science and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6982-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6982-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6981-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6982-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)