Skip to main content

Effect of Lifting Height and Weight Magnitude on Biomechanical Loading During Manual Lifting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology Enabled Ergonomic Design (HWWE 2020)

Part of the book series: Design Science and Innovation ((DSI))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

In India, manual material handling (MMH) activities in asymmetrical postures are very common in the manufacturing industry and building construction sites. MMH involves any tasks that require a person to lift, lower, push, push, hold, or carry objects, vertically or horizontally, from one location to another with hands. These physical manual activities overtax the human musculoskeletal system, which may exceed workers’ physical limitations. The measurement of ground reaction forces (GRFs) shows a good measure of the musculoskeletal stresses being exerted on the workers performing such tasks. The research studies on the effect of vertical GRF and loading rate (LR) on the human body during running, walking, and jumping were well documented, but rarely have been used to evaluate lifting tasks. There is thus a need for a scientific study to investigate the effect of lifting task parameters and their interactions on the GRF and LR of workers in dynamic lifting human activities. This experimental study investigated the effect of lifting task parameters; lifting magnitude and lifting height based on subjective and biomechanical loading estimates. The subjective estimate was obtained using workload assessment by body discomfort chart. The biomechanical loading (loading rate) was calculated from GRF data, obtained using a force plate. Twelve male subjects in the age group of 20–25 years lifted containers of five different weights between 10 and 20 kg, from below knee height (origin) to various destination heights (below knee, knee, waist, shoulder, and ear level). In the experiment, the subjects were instructed to lift the weight in a 90° asymmetric posture using free-style lifting techniques. Both the task parameters, lifting weight and lifting heights, were observed to be significant. The results showed that vertical reaction forces increase when subjects lift the weight from the floor to ear height. It was also observed that the instantaneous loading rate increases with an increase in the level of lifting magnitude and lifting height; a significant extra loading rate is required to change the lower level of load and destination height to higher levels. Safe limits for significant factors are proposed to result in the optimal performance of the manual lifting task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Khoshnevis B (2004) Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr 13(1):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardiny H, Witwicki S, Mondada F (2015) Are autonomous mobile robots able to take over construction? A review. Int J Robot, Theory Appl 4(3):10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett JG (1999) Overexertion injuries in construction. J Constr Eng Manag 125(2):109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschman JS, Van der Molen HF, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH (2012) Musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers: a one-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:1–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai B, Jin S, Ning X, Mirka GA (2010) The effects of horizontal load speed and lifting frequency on lifting technique and biomechanics. Ergonomics 53(8):1024–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher S, Pollard J, Porter W (2011) Electromyography of the thigh muscles during lifting tasks in kneeling and squatting postures. Ergonomics 54(1):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PL, Volinn E (1999) Is occupational low back pain on the rise? Spine 24(7):691–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera KL, Loomis D, Lipscomb HJ, Marshall SW, Mirka GA, Daniels JL (2009) Ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in North Carolina crab pot and gill net commercial fishermen. Am J Ind Med 52(4):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi-Adl A (2006) Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element. J Biomech 39(2):267–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathallah FA, Marras WS, Parnianpour M (1998) An assessment of complex spinal loads during dynamic lifting tasks. Spine 23(6):706–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson GBJ, Ortengren R, Schultz AB (1980) Analysis and measurement of the loads on the lumbar spine during work at a table. J. Biomechan 13(6):513–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kromodihardjo S, Mital A (1987) Biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks. J Biomech Engng 109:i32-138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullian D, Stobb T, Bang S, Goddard D, Han B, Simmers R (1995) Asymmetric loading on the body during symmetric lift. In: Advances in Industrial Ergonomics, and Safety VII, Taylor & Francis, pp 719–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuang YH, Cheng CK, Wang CL, Chen PQ, Hang YS, Liu TK (1995) The center of ground reaction force during lifting. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 19(1):54–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadio AC, Lobo Da Costa PH, Sacco ICN, Serrao JC, Araujo RC, Mochizuki L (1999) Introduction to biomechanics for human movement analysis: description and application of measurement method. Brazilian J Phys Theor 3(2):41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber GS, Chang CC, Kingma I, Dennerlein JT (2013) Estimating dynamic external hand forces during manual materials handling based on ground reaction forces and body segment accelerations. J Biomech 46(15):273640

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena S, Sakhare GM, Panda SK, Thirugnanam A (2017) Evaluation and prediction of human gait parameters using univariate, multivariate and stepwise statistical methods. J Mech Med Biol 17(05):1750076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter SL, Schleifer LM, Knutson SJ (1991) Work posture, work station design and musculoskeletal discomfort in a VDT data entry task. Hum Factors 33(2):151–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Batish A, Singh TP (2014) Determination of safe limits of significant task parameters during manual lifting. Workplace Health Safety 62(4):150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2004) Occupational Ill Health Statistics Updated

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anurag Vijaywargiya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vijaywargiya, A., Bhiwapurkar, M., Thirugnanam, A. (2022). Effect of Lifting Height and Weight Magnitude on Biomechanical Loading During Manual Lifting. In: Rana, N.K., Shah, A.A., Iqbal, R., Khanzode, V. (eds) Technology Enabled Ergonomic Design. HWWE 2020. Design Science and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6982-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6982-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6981-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6982-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics