Skip to main content

Comparison of Expert Tutors Through Syntactic Analysis of Transcripts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9112))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 6118 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we show that the C4.5 machine learning algorithm, applied to a number of syntactic features in transcripts, can be used to accurately differentiate between two expert human tutors. Although these tutors had taught together for years and explicitly discussed their tutoring style with one other, an analysis based on frequency of parts of speech and higher-level syntactic constructs was able to easily separate their productions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chi, M.: Active-constructive-interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 73–105 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Graesser, A., McNamara, D., VanLehn, K.: Scaffolding Deep Comprehension Strategies through Point & Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist 40, 225–234 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stamatatos, E.: A Survey of Modern Authorship Attribution Methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(3), 538–556 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graesser, A., McNamara, D., Louwerse, M., Cai, Z.: Coh-Metrix: Analysis of Text on Cohesion and Language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 36, 193–202 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Evens, M., Michael, J.: One-on-One Tutoring by Humans and Computers. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein, D., Manning, C.: Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In: Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 423-430 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Santorini, B. Part-of-Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project. University of Pennsylvania, Natural Language Processing Project. Technical Report MS–CIS-90-47 LINC LAB 178 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1), 10–19 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Quinlan, J.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reva Freedman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Freedman, R., Krieghbaum, D. (2015). Comparison of Expert Tutors Through Syntactic Analysis of Transcripts. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics