Skip to main content

Predicting Misalignment Between Teachers’ and Students’ Essay Scores Using Natural Language Processing Tools

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9112))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigated linguistic factors that relate to misalignment between students’ and teachers’ ratings of essay quality. Students (n = 126) wrote essays and rated the quality of their work. Teachers then provided their own ratings of the essays. Results revealed that students who were less accurate in their self-assessments produced essays that were more causal, contained less meaningful words, and had less argument overlap between sentences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Varner, L.K., Roscoe, R.D., McNamara, D.S.: Evaluative Misalignment of 10th-Grade Student and Teacher Criteria for Essay Quality: An Automated Textual Analysis. Journal of Writing Research 5, 35–59 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunlosky, J., Ariel, R.: Self-Regulated Learning and the Allocation of Study Time. In: Ross, B. (Ed.) Psychology of Learning and Motivation, pp. 103–140 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kos, R., Maslowski, C.: Second Graders’ Perceptions of What is Important in Writing. The Elementary School Journal 101, 567–585 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McNamara, D.S., Graesser, A.C., McCarthy, P.M., Cai, Z.: Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Kyle, K., Crossley, S.A.: Automatically Assessing Lexical Sophistication: Indices, Tools, Findings, and Application. TESOL Quarterly (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crossley, S.A., Kyle, K., McNamara, D.S.: Automatic Assessment of Local and Global Cohesion: Implications for Text Comprehension, Coherence, and Quality. Discourse Processes (under review)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McNamara, D.S., Crossley, S.A., Roscoe, R.D., Allen, L.K., Dai, J.: Natural Language Processing in a Writing Strategy Tutoring System: Hierarchical Classification Approach to Automated Essay Scoring. Assessing Writing 23, 35–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura K. Allen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Allen, L.K., Crossley, S.A., McNamara, D.S. (2015). Predicting Misalignment Between Teachers’ and Students’ Essay Scores Using Natural Language Processing Tools. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics