Skip to main content

Abstract

Diffusion theory, popular in the marketing literature in the 1960s and 1970s, has received very little attention in recent years. The accomplishments based on the diffusion process concept are notable ones. However, there are some gaps in this literature. This paper attempts to explain some of the inconsistencies present in diffusional theories and proposes competing and/or complementary explanations based on the theory of weak ties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, G.M. and L.P. Feldman (1976), "Exposure and Sources of Opinion Leaders," Journal of Advertising Research, 16, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, Johan (1967), "Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product," Journal of Marketing Research, 4, 291–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F. (1951), "Channels of Communication in Small Groups," American Sociological Review, 16, 463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czepiel, J.A. (1974), "Word-of-Mouth Processes in the Diffusion of a Major Technological Innovation," Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 172–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D. and D.T. Kollat (1978), Consumer Behavior, Hindsdale, IL.: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J.F., Kegerreis, R.J. and R.D. Blackwell (1969), "Word-of-Mouth Communication by the Innovator," Journal of Marketing, 33, 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954), "A Theory of Social Comparison Processes," Human Relations, 7, 117–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. and E. Ellis (1980), "A Reexamination of Group Influence on Member Brand Preference," Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin, N. (1980), "A Test of Structural Features of Granovetter’s Strength of Weak Ties Theory," Social Networks, 2, 411–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. (1973), "The Strength of Weak Ties," American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. (1957), "The Two-Step Flow of Communication," Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, 61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. and P.F. Lazarsfeld (1955), Personal InfluenceNew York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Z.V. (1972), "Perceptual Patterns, Information Handling, and Innovativeness," Journal of Marketing Research 9, 427–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., and H. Gandet (1944), The People’s Choice, New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W.T. and R. W. Duff (1972), "The Strength in Weak Ties," Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 361–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter V. and Karen E. Campbell (1984), "Measuring Tie Strength," Social Forces, 63, 482–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, D. F. and G. R. Dowling (1978), "Innovativeness: The Concept and its Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 229–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, G.P. (1976), "Social Comparison and Informal Group Influence," Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J.H. and T.S. Robertson (1972), "Dimensions of Opinion Leadership," Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicosia, F. (1964), "Opinion Leadership and the Flow of Communication: Some Problems and Prospects," Proceedings, American Marketing Association, 340–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapaport, A. and W. Horvath (1961), "A Study of a Large Sociogram," Behavioral Science, 6, 279–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reingen, Peter H. and Jerome B. Kernan (1986), "Analysis of Referral Networks in Marketing: Methods and Illustration," Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (November), 370–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, F.D. and W.R. Darden (1971), "Mutually Adaptive Effects of Interpersonal Communication," Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T.S. (1968), "The Effect of the Informal Group Upon Member Innovative Behavior," Proceedings, American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T.S. and J.H. Myers (1969), "Personality Correlates of Opinion Leadership and Innovative Buying Behavior," Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 164–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovation, 3rd ed, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. and P. K. Bhowmid (1971), "Homophily-Heterophily: Relational Concepts for Communication Research," Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. and D. G. Cartano (1962), "Methods of Measuring Opinion Leadership," Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 435–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish N. (1971), "Word-of-Mouth in Low-Risk Innovations," Journal of Advertising Research, June, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, J.E. (1966), "Effects of Group Influence on Consumer Brand Choices," Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. (1970), "The Identity of Women’s Clothing Fashion Opinion Leaders," Journal of Marketing Resarch, 7, 178–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.W. (1977), "A Striking Characteristic of Innovators," Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 104–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, Gabriel (1983), "The Strength of Weak Conversational Ties in the Flow of Information and Influence," Social Networks, 5, 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, R.E. (1969), "Informal Social Group Influence on Consumer Brand Choice," Journal of Marketing Research, 6, 473–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, R.E. and G.D. Bruce (1970), "Purchase Decisions and Group Influence," Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 533–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, R.E. and G.D. Bruce (1972), "Group Influence and Brand Choice Congruence," Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 440–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Debevec, K., Schmidt, S.L. (2015). The Diffusion of Innovations: Let’s Take Another Look. In: Hawes, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 1989 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17055-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics