Abstract
This chapter assesses recent results of changes in water temperature, salinity , sea ice, storm surges and wind waves during the twenty-first century in scenario simulations for the Baltic Sea. There have been several improvements since the first Baltic Sea assessment of climate change: the number of relevant scenario simulations has increased, ensembles of transient simulations with improved models based upon the scenarios and global models of IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) have been analysed, and changes in biogeochemical cycles are now considered. The scenario simulations project that water temperatures will increase in the future, with the greatest changes in the northern Baltic Sea during summer. In agreement with earlier studies, sea-ice cover is projected to decrease drastically. Salinity is projected to decrease due to increased river run-off, whereas the impact of wind changes on salinity is negligible because the latter is relatively small. However, uncertainty in salinity projections is large owing to considerable bias in the simulated water balance. According to one study, salt transport into the Baltic Sea is unchanged. Sea-level rise has greater potential to increase surge levels in the Baltic Sea than increased wind speed, and changes in wind waves are projected to be small.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Model-based projections of climate change for the marine parts of the Baltic Sea region are sparse compared to studies for the atmosphere. The first assessment of climate change in the Baltic Sea area (BACC Author Team 2008) concluded that ‘the mean annual sea surface temperatures could increase by some 2–4 °C by the end of the twenty-first century. Ice extent in the sea would then decrease by some 50–80 %. The average salinity of the Baltic Sea is projected to decrease between 8 and 50 %. However, it should be noted that these oceanographic findings are based upon only four regional scenario simulations using two emissions scenarios and two global models’. At that time, only one study addressing uncertainties was available and this was based on a larger ensemble of 16 simulations to project Baltic Sea salinity by the end of this century (Meier et al. 2006c).
The reason why only a few Baltic Sea scenario simulations have been performed compared to scenario simulations for the atmosphere might be that the former are computationally demanding due to the high horizontal and vertical grid resolutions required. Furthermore, from the ocean perspective, the dynamical downscaling technique used to investigate changes in climate at regional scales requires coupled atmosphere–ice–ocean models (Döscher et al. 2002; Räisänen et al. 2004) instead of uncoupled regional climate model (RCM) simulations (Kjellström et al. 2011; Nikulin et al. 2011) because sea-surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice concentration fields from general circulation models (GCMs) used as surface boundary conditions in RCMs might be biased due to the coarse resolution of GCMs. Such biases would affect model sensitivity and hence the results in climate projections (Meier et al. 2011d). To reduce computational demands, scenario simulations were performed for selected time slices only (e.g. Madsen 2009) which requires the application of the ‘delta’ or ‘delta change ’ approach (e.g. Meier 2002).
Since the first assessment of climate change in the Baltic Sea basin (BACC Author Team 2008), the number of relevant scenario simulations has increased considerably. In particular, a large number of scenario simulations were carried out during 2009–2011 within the ECOSUPPORT project (advanced modelling tool for scenarios of the Baltic Sea ECOsystem to SUPPORT decision making, www.baltex-research.eu/ecosupport). The following items characterise the new simulations compared to the first BACC assessment:
-
The horizontal resolution of atmosphere and ocean model components increased to typically less than 25 and 3.6 km, respectively (e.g. Meier et al. 2011b).
-
New model versions of GCMs and RCMs were used.
-
The results and assumptions of the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC 2007) were used instead of those from the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report (IPCC 2001).
-
Multi-model ensemble modelling was introduced to estimate uncertainties due to biases in the Baltic Sea models (e.g. Meier et al. 2011b).
-
Instead of time slices often combined with the delta approach (e.g. Meier 2006), transient simulations (1960–2100) were performed (e.g. Neumann 2010).
-
Coupled physical–biogeochemical models were used (Neumann 2010; Meier et al. 2011a, b, c, 2012a, b, c; Eilola et al. 2012; Neumann et al. 2012).
This chapter relies on literature concerning climate change scenario simulations for the Baltic Sea between 2007 and (March) 2012. The focus is on projected changes in water temperature, salinity , sea ice, storm surges , and wind waves . Changes in marine biogeochemical variables such as oxygen , nutrients , and phytoplankton (chlorophyll ) concentrations are addressed in Chaps. 18 and 19. The graphics included in this chapter (with the exception of Fig. 13.6) show ensemble mean changes projected for 2069–2098 relative to a baseline/reference of 1978–2007 in transient scenario simulations calculated with three coupled physical–biogeochemical models for the Baltic Sea following Meier et al. (2011b, 2012c). The Baltic Sea models are forced with RCM data driven by two GCMs at the lateral boundaries and two greenhouse gas (GHG) emission scenarios (SRES A1B and A2, see Nakićenović et al. 2000). The atmospheric forcing fields of the RCM were analysed by Meier et al. (2011d). Results at six monitoring stations representing different sub-basins of the Baltic Sea are reported in this chapter. The locations of the monitoring stations are depicted in Fig. 13.1.
2 Water Temperature
Projected change in seasonal and annual mean ensemble average SST is shown in Fig. 13.2. The projected change is greatest in the Bothnian Bay and Bothnian Sea during summer and in the Gulf of Finland during spring. According to the mini-ensemble, which is forced by the SRES A1B and A2 scenarios, summer SST could increase by about 2–4 °C in the southern and northern Baltic Sea, respectively. The north–south gradient in SST change is caused at least partly by the ice-albedo feedback, which increases SST sensitivity in the northern Baltic Sea (Meier et al. 2011d).
The projected change in annual mean temperature at the six monitoring stations (Fig. 13.1) is 2–3 °C (surface water layers) and 0–2 °C (deep-water layers) (Fig. 13.3). At Anholt East in the Kattegat , temperatures in the deep-water remain unchanged due to the assumption in the scenario simulations that the vertical temperature and salinity profiles at the lateral boundaries in the Kattegat or Skagerrak (depending on the ocean model used) do not change over time. Sensitivity experiments showed that artificially fixing the boundary data does not affect the Baltic Sea interior (Meier 2002). This is because in the model even during major Baltic inflow events the inflowing water volume is smaller than that of the Kattegat surface layer. Because at the time scale of inflows, no water from outside the model domain is advected through the Danish straits into the Baltic Sea and because at this time scale, the heat budget of the Kattegat surface layer is controlled by vertical heat fluxes, water masses that flow into the Baltic Sea are usually realistically simulated.
In all sub-basins, the surface layer is projected to warm more than the deep-water. Although this increasing temperature differential would cause an increase in vertical stratification, the projected salinity change is more significant in terms of water density than the projected temperature change. Hence, scenario simulations suggest that the vertical stratification between surface and deep-water layers would actually decrease (see Sect. 13.3).
The magnitude and spatial patterns of change in water temperature are relatively similar when different Baltic Sea models use the same atmospheric forcing (Meier et al. 2011a, b, 2012a, c). Even with atmospheric forcing from different RCMs or different GHG emission scenarios (SRES A2, B2, A1B, B1), temperature changes are similar (Meier 2006; Neumann 2010; Neumann and Friedland 2011; Gräwe et al. 2013) although temperature changes in the B1 scenario appear smaller than those in the other scenarios and a stabilising tendency at the end of the scenario simulation is observed (Neumann 2010; Neumann and Friedland 2011).
Most of the scenario simulations for the Baltic Sea were performed with regionally limited ocean models with lateral boundaries in the Kattegat or Skagerrak. Due to the proximity of the lateral boundary, results for the Kattegat are not reliable. Instead, projections for the North Sea should be employed to study changes in the Kattegat and Skagerrak (Ådlandsvik 2008; Holt et al. 2010). Only Madsen (2009) investigated both shallow seas—the Baltic Sea and the North Sea—simultaneously and found that warming is greater in the Baltic Sea than that in the North Sea.
Holt et al. (2010) found in the A1B scenario that the shelf sea regions warm substantially more than the open ocean, by 1.5–4 °C depending on location. These results agree with observed warming trends in the Baltic Sea, North Sea and other shelf seas (Belkin 2009).
3 Salinity
Results of the multi-model ensemble simulations by Meier et al. (2011b, 2012c) indicate that projected changes in sea-surface salinity are small in the northern and eastern Baltic Sea (smallest in the Bothnian Bay) and greatest in the Danish straits region, especially in the Belt Sea (Fig. 13.4). The latter are due to a shift in the fronts within the transition zone. Seasonal change in sea-surface salinity is projected to be minimal.
The projected reductions in salinity in the Bornholm Basin and Gotland Basin are almost constant with depth and amount to 1.5–2 g kg−1 in the ensemble mean (Fig. 13.5). However, change in the deep-water is greater than that in the surface layer in these sub-basins. In more weakly stratified regions such as the Gulf of Finland or Bothnian Bay, the difference in the projected change for salinity in surface and bottom layers is even greater causing a reduction in vertical stability. These results are consistent across the three Baltic Sea models. The projections of halocline depth are most uncertain in the Gotland Basin , as indicated by the standard deviation among the ensemble members (Fig. 13.5).
In the ensemble presented, the salinity changes projected are driven by changes in run-off which is projected to increase by 15–22 % (Meier et al. 2012b). The latter figures are estimated from the difference between precipitation and evaporation over land calculated from the RCM output directly (Meier et al. 2012b). If a hydrological model is used to calculate run-off from the same atmospheric forcing, run-off changes are smaller and increase by 4–13 % (Arheimer et al. 2012). These discrepancies illustrate the uncertainty in hydrological modelling.
In the ensemble presented by Meier et al. (2012b), changes in wind speed play only a minor role in the salinity changes in contrast to earlier findings by Meier (2006). In the latter scenario simulations driven by ECHAM4/OPYC3, monthly mean increases in wind speed of almost 30 % were found during February (Räisänen et al. 2004). Hence, salinity projections remain uncertain in accordance with earlier results by Meier et al. (2006c) owing to the uncertainty in wind speed projections over the Baltic Sea region (Kjellström et al. 2011; Nikulin et al. 2011). However, there is generally a tendency for both increased mean (Kjellström et al. 2011) and extreme (Nikulin et al. 2011) wind speeds over the sea.
Although all studies based on dynamical modelling suggest that in a future climate, Baltic Sea salinity will decrease or remain unchanged compared to the present-day climate (Meier 2006; Meier et al. 2006c, 2011b, 2012b; Neumann 2010), Hansson et al. (2011) claimed that run-off from the total Baltic Sea catchment would decrease if air temperature rises. Hansson et al. (2011) reconstructed river run-off to the Baltic Sea for the period 1500–1995 using a statistical approach with air temperature and atmospheric circulation indices as predictors. They found that over the past 500 years, the total river run-off to the Baltic Sea showed no significant long-term trend but decreased slightly in response to the observed rise in temperature, at a rate of 3 % per 1 °C rise (see also Chap. 5, Fig. 5.3). However, their approach considerably underestimates interannual variability. In addition, changes in future climate that by the end of the century are projected to be outside the range of decadal variability are very likely not comparable with changes in past climate because past anthropogenic warming is small and other drivers may have controlled the air temperature –run-off relationship.
Studies of both past and future climates suggest that increased total run-off would increase the ventilation of the upper halocline due to weakened stratification causing improved oxygen conditions in the upper deep-water (e.g. Gustafsson and Omstedt 2009; Meier et al. 2011b). Despite changing halocline depth, stratification changes in the Baltic proper due to increased freshwater supply are expected to be minor (Meier 2005). Increased freshwater supply would drive an increased recirculation of brackish surface waters and consequently reduced saltwater fluxes into the Baltic Sea. For the hydrography of the north-western European continental shelf, Holt et al. (2010) found that the strength of seasonal stratification may increase by about 20 % on the shelf, compared with 20–50 % in the open ocean. The former being controlled by temperature and the latter by salinity.
Hordoir and Meier (2011) found increased spring and summer stratification under a warmer climate, with the changes greater in the northern Baltic Sea than the southern. The north–south gradient might be partly explained by the salinity-dependent temperature of maximum density. In the present climate, winter temperatures in the Baltic Sea are often below the temperature of maximum density such that warming during spring causes thermal convection (see also Chap. 7, Sect. 7.1). In a future climate, temperatures are expected to be typically higher than the temperature of maximum density and thermally induced stratification may start without prior thermal convection (Hordoir and Meier 2011). In particular, in the northern Baltic Sea, these stratification changes might affect vertical nutrient fluxes and thus the intensity of the spring bloom in future climate.
Gräwe and Burchard (2011, 2012) and Gräwe et al. (2013) studied local changes in the western Baltic Sea with a high-resolution model. They found no significant trend in potential energy measuring the competition between stratification and mixing . They also found no clear tendencies in the projected change in saltwater transport for either medium or major inflow events.
4 Sea Ice
Whether there is a reduction in sea-ice cover in the future depends mainly on the projected change in air temperature over the Baltic Sea in winter; other drivers such as wind are considered less important (e.g. Tinz 1996; Meier et al. 2004a, 2011d; Meier 2006; Jylhä et al. 2008; Neumann 2010). Hence, the projected changes in sea-ice cover depend on the GHG emission scenario, the GCM and the Baltic Sea model used. Both dynamical modelling and statistical modelling suggest that the relationship between annual maximum ice extent and winter mean air temperature changes is nonlinear (Meier et al. 2004a; Jylhä et al. 2008), that is, even under a warmer future climate, sea ice is likely in the northern Baltic Sea (Fig. 13.6).
For instance, Jylhä et al. (2008) examined the Baltic Sea ice cover using a statistical model that related annual maximum ice extent to wintertime coastal temperatures. They found that all model simulations, irrespective of the forcing scenario (SRES A2, B2 scenarios) and driving RCM (seven RCMs of the PRUDENCE project), produce considerably milder sea-ice conditions. However, they used only one driving GCM and concluded that a larger number of GCMs as drivers of the RCMs is likely to have resulted in wider ranges in sea-ice estimates than those in their study (see Fig. 13.6). This could explain why Jylhä et al. (2008) found more frequent unprecedentedly mild years for 2070–2100 than in the scenarios by Meier et al. (2004a). Nevertheless, all new scenario simulations indicate a strong decrease in sea-ice extent in agreement with earlier studies summarised in the first BACC assessment (BACC Author Team 2008).
Although new sea-ice models with explicitly resolved sea-ice categories for ridged and rafted ice (Haapala et al. 2005) have been applied in scenario simulations for the Baltic Sea, results for ice categories are not yet published.
5 Storm Surges
Past sea-level variability, trends and possible drivers are addressed in Chap. 9. Future changes in the mean sea level of the Baltic Sea caused by large-scale drivers such as steric expansion , geoid changes, melting of mountain glaciers and ice caps and changes in the mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are discussed in Chap. 14. This chapter focuses on changes projected in regional sea level caused by changes in the regional wind field. A few scenario simulations for the Baltic Sea that consider other regional drivers such as changes in sea-ice cover and regional thermosteric and halosteric changes are also available (e.g. Madsen 2009; Hünicke 2010; Gräwe and Burchard 2012).
Tidal amplitude in the Baltic Sea is small. However, tidal amplitudes in the Skagerrak, particularly for the semi-diurnal constituents, are significant. On the European Shelf, future sea-level rise is projected to cause non-negligible increases and decreases in the amplitude of the principal lunar, semi-diurnal tidal constituent (M2) depending on the assumed large-scale sea-level rise (Pickering et al. 2012; Müller et al. 2013).
For the Baltic Sea, results of the transient (1960–2100), multi-model ensemble simulations by Meier et al. (2011b, 2012c) indicate that at the end of the century, changes in mean sea-surface height are projected to be greatest during spring and up to 20 cm in coastal areas of Bothnian Bay (Fig. 13.7). The annual mean sea-surface height is projected to reach a maximum of 10 cm. The large spring signal is caused by one of the three Baltic Sea models and is related to the earlier melt of sea ice in a future climate. In model results by Meier et al. (2012a), only mean sea-level changes caused by regional wind changes and in one model even by steric effects are considered and neither the large-scale sea-level rise nor land uplift is included and has to be added to compile plausible future sea-level scenarios (Meier et al. 2004b). The changes projected in sea-level extremes (or storm surges) from the scenario simulations by Meier et al. (2011b) have not yet been analysed.
An evaluation of the earlier scenario simulations by Meier et al. (2004b) or Meier (2006) indicates that during the control period, both mean seasonal cycles and 100-year surge events in the Baltic Sea are simulated well relative to observations. However, extreme sea-level events in the western Baltic Sea and Danish straits were considerably underestimated, probably because the regional topography was not sufficiently resolved using a Baltic Sea model with a relatively coarse horizontal resolution of about 11 km only (Meier 2006). To address this shortcoming, Gräwe and Burchard (2012) used a high-resolution local model for the western Baltic Sea (with a spatial resolution of about 1 km), nested into a RCM in a dynamical downscaling approach, which also took into account baroclinic effects. They found that the quality of surge heights in their model was significantly better than in the driving model. Taking available global sea-level rise scenarios and simulated regional wind speed changes, Gräwe and Burchard (2012) found that sea-level rise has greater potential to increase surge levels in the Baltic Sea than does increased wind speed. Using the SRES A1B scenario and assuming a sea-level rise of 50 cm and a change in mean wind speed of approximately 4 %, resulted in projected surges with a 100-year return period for 2071–2100 that were greatest at the stations Lübeck, Koserow and Gedser in the western Baltic Sea and up to 2.7 m compared to simulated surge heights of less than 2.1 m for 1961–2000. However, the relative impact of changing wind speed on sea-level extremes might be greater for stations in the eastern Baltic Sea, for example in St Petersburg, depending on the driving GCM used (Meier 2006). Furthermore, Gräwe and Burchard (2012) found that changes in storm surge height in the scenarios can be consistently explained by the increase in mean sea level and variation in wind speed, supporting earlier approaches by Meier et al. (2004b) and Meier (2006).
In addition to the impact of changing winds on sea levels, Madsen (2009) analysed steric effects using a coupled North Sea and Baltic Sea model. The author found maximum halosteric changes in annual mean sea level of about 6.5 cm in the Baltic Sea. Hence, locally generated steric effects will be small compared to those of the NE Atlantic Ocean, basically because of the relatively small water depths. Changes in sea level from dynamical adjustment of global and regional changes might be greater but have not been studied in detail.
Hünicke and Zorita (2008) found an increase in sea-level amplitude (i.e. the difference between mean winter and spring sea level) and suggested that this could be due to the long-term trend in seasonal precipitation. The results fit well with the projections by Hünicke (2010) who applied a statistical downscaling approach to the output of five GCMs. The author found that using both sea-level pressure and precipitation as the predictor resulted in significant future change in the sea level of Baltic Sea. Although Hünicke’s estimates are lower, they are of the same order of magnitude as the projected rise in global sea level.
The implications of sea-level rise for various coasts have been analysed by several authors. For instance, impacts on the Estonian, Polish and Danish coasts were discussed by Kont et al. (2008), Pruszak and Zawadzka (2005, 2009) and Fenger et al. (2008), respectively. For further details, see Chap. 20.
6 Wind Waves
Since the first BACC assessment (BACC Author Team 2008), when scenario simulations with simplified wave models only were available (Meier et al. 2006a, b), advanced wave models have been applied for the Baltic Sea (e.g. Weisse and Günther 2007) and projections of the future wave climate have been made both at the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (Kriezi and Broman 2008) and at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht (Groll and Hünicke 2011).
In a recent study by Dreier et al. (2011), a statistical model based on wind–wave correlations and wind data derived from RCM simulations forced by ECHAM5/MPI-OM and two GHG emission scenarios (SRES A1B, B1) was used to perform scenario simulations of the future wave climate along the German Baltic Sea coast. The results indicate only a small increase in overall wave energy input in a future climate. However, the frequency of wave directions from the west could increase by 3.5 % compared to present-day conditions.
7 Conclusion
Recent studies confirm the findings of the first assessment of climate change in the Baltic Sea basin (BACC Author Team 2008), namely that under all GHG emission scenarios used (covering the range between SRES B1 and A2), water temperature is projected to increase significantly and sea-ice cover to decrease significantly. Warming would enhance the stability across the seasonal thermocline .
Although one study claimed an increase in salinity in the Baltic Sea under a warmer climate, most studies project decreased salinity and reduced stability across the permanent halocline due to higher, spatially integrated run-off from land. No clear tendencies in saltwater transport were found. However, the uncertainty in salinity projections is likely to be large due to biases in atmospheric and hydrological models.
Although wind speed is projected to increase over sea, especially over areas with diminishing ice cover, no significant trend was found in potential energy (measuring the competition between stratification and mixing). In accordance with earlier results, it was found that sea-level rise has greater potential to increase surge levels in the Baltic Sea than does increased wind speed.
In contrast to the first BACC assessment (BACC Author Team 2008), the findings reported in this chapter are based on multi-model ensemble scenario simulations using several GHG emissions scenarios and Baltic Sea models. However, it is very likely that estimates of uncertainty caused by biases in GCMs are still underestimated in most studies.
References
Ådlandsvik B (2008) Marine downscaling of a future climate scenario for the North Sea. Tellus A 60:451-458
Arheimer B, Dahne J, Donnelly C (2012) Climate change impact on riverine nutrient load and land-based remedial measures of the Baltic Sea Action Plan. Ambio 41:600-612
BACC Author Team (2008) Assessment of Climate Change for the Baltic Sea Basin. Regional Climate Studies, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
Belkin I (2009) Rapid warming of large marine ecosystems. Prog Oceanogr 81:207-213
Döscher R, Willén U, Jones C, Rutgersson A, Meier HEM, Hansson U, Graham LP (2002) The development of the regional coupled ocean-atmosphere model RCAO. Boreal Environ Res 7:183-192
Dreier N, Schlamkow C, Fröhle P (2011) Assessment of future wave climate on basis of wind-wave correlations and climate change scenarios. J Coast Res SI 64:210-214
Eilola K, Almroth-Rosell E, Dieterich C, Fransner F, Höglund A, Meier HEM (2012) Nutrient transports and interactions between coastal regions and the open Baltic Sea: A model study in present and future climate. Ambio 41:586-599
Fenger J, Buch E, Jakobsen PR, Vestergaard P (2008) Danish attitudes and reactions to the threat of sea-level rise. J Coast Res 24:394-402
Gräwe U, Burchard H (2011) Global change and Baltic coastal zones - regionalisation of climate scenarios for the western Baltic Sea. In: Schernewski G, Hofstede J, Neumann T (eds), Global Change and Baltic Coastal Zones. Springer, Dordrecht
Gräwe U, Burchard H (2012) Storm surges in the Western Baltic Sea: the present and a possible future. Clim Dynam 39:165-183
Gräwe U, Friedland R, Burchard H (2013) The future of the western Baltic Sea: two possible scenarios. Ocean Dynam 63:901-921
Groll N, Hünicke B (2011) Baltic Sea wave conditions in a changing climate. Geophys Res Abstr 14:EGU2012-5481
Gustafsson EO, Omstedt A (2009) Sensitivity of Baltic Sea deep water salinity and oxygen concentration to variations in physical forcing. Boreal Environ Res 14:18-30
Haapala J, Lönnroth N, Stössel A (2005) A numerical study of open water formation in sea ice. J Geophys Res 110:C09011. doi:10.1029/2003JC002200
Hansson D, Eriksson C, Omstedt A, Chen D (2011) Reconstruction of river runoff to the Baltic Sea, AD 1500–1995. Int J Climatol 31:696-703
Holt J, Wakelin S, Lowe J, Tinker J (2010) The potential impacts of climate change on the hydrography of the northwest European continental shelf. Progr Oceanogr 86:361-379
Hordoir R, Meier HEM (2011) Effect of climate change on the thermal stratification of the Baltic Sea: a sensitivity experiment. Clim Dynam 38:1703-1713
Hünicke B (2010) Contribution of regional climate drivers to future winter sea-level changes in the Baltic Sea estimated by statistical methods and simulations of climate models. Int J Earth Sci 99:1721-1730
Hünicke B, Zorita E (2008) Trends in the amplitude of Baltic Sea level annual cycle. Tellus A 60:154-164
IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution from Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Miller HL, Chen Z (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Jylhä K, Fronzek S, Tuomenvirta H, Carter TR, Ruosteenoja K (2008) Changes in frost, snow and Baltic sea ice by the end of the twenty-first century based on climate model projections for Europe. Climatic Change 86:441-462
Kjellström E, Nikulin G, Hansson U, Strandberg G, Ullerstig A (2011) 21st century changes in the European climate: uncertainties derived from an ensemble of regional climate model simulations. Tellus A 63:24-40
Kont A, Jaagus J, Aunao R, Ratas U, Rivis R (2008) Implications of sea-level rise for Estonia. J Coast Res 24:423-431
Kriezi EE, Broman B (2008) Past and future wave climate in the Baltic Sea produced by the SWAN model with forcing from the regional climate model RCA of the Rossby Centre. In: IEEE/OES US/EU-Baltic International Symposium, 27-29 May 2008, Tallinn, Estonia, p 360-366
Madsen KS (2009) Recent and future climatic changes in temperature, salinity and sea level of the North Sea and Baltic Sea. PhD thesis, Planet and Geophysics, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen
Meier HEM (2002) Regional ocean climate simulations with a 3D ice ocean model for the Baltic Sea. Part 1: Model experiments and results for temperature and salinity. Clim Dynam 19:237-253
Meier HEM (2005) Modeling the age of Baltic Sea water masses: Quantification and steady state sensitivity experiments. J Geophys Res 110:C02006. doi:10.1029/2004JC002607
Meier HEM (2006) Baltic Sea climate in the late twenty-first century: a dynamical downscaling approach using two global models and two emission scenarios. Clim Dynam 27:39-68
Meier HEM, Döscher R, Halkka A (2004a) Simulated distributions of Baltic sea-ice in warming climate and consequences for the winter habitat of the Baltic ringed seal. Ambio 33:249-256
Meier HEM, Broman B, Kjellström E (2004b) Simulated sea level in past and future climates of the Baltic Sea. Clim Res 27:59-75
Meier HEM, Andréasson J, Broman B, Graham LP, Kjellström E, Persson G, Viehhauser M (2006a) Climate change scenario simulations of wind, sea level, and river discharge in the Baltic Sea and Lake Mälaren region - a dynamical downscaling approach from global to local scales. SMHI Reports Meteorology and Climatology No.109
Meier HEM, Broman B, Kallio H, Kjellström E (2006b) Projections of future surface winds, sea levels, and wind waves in the late 21st century and their application for impact studies of flood prone areas in the Baltic Sea region. In: Schmidt-Thomé P (ed), Sea Level Changes Affecting the Spatial Development of the Baltic Sea Region, Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 41, p 23-43
Meier HEM, Kjellström E, Graham LP (2006c) Estimating uncertainties of projected Baltic Sea salinity in the late 21st century. Geophys Res Lett 33:L15705. doi: 10.1029/2006GL026488
Meier HEM, Andersson H, Dieterich C, Eilola K, Gustafsson BG, Höglund A, Hordoir R, Schimanke S (2011a) Transient scenario simulations for the Baltic Sea Region during the 21st century. SMHI Report Oceanografi No108
Meier HEM, Andersson HC, Eilola K, Gustafsson BG, Kuznetsov I, Müller-Karulis B, Neumann T, Savchuk OP (2011b) Hypoxia in future climates - a model ensemble study for the Baltic Sea. Geophys Res Lett 38:L24608. doi:10.1029/2011GL049929
Meier HEM, Eilola K, Almroth E (2011c) Climate-related changes in marine ecosystems simulated with a three-dimensional coupled biogeochemical-physical model of the Baltic Sea. Clim Res 48:31-55
Meier HEM, Höglund A, Döscher R, Andersson H, Löptien U, Kjellström E (2011d) Quality assessment of atmospheric surface fields over the Baltic Sea of an ensemble of regional climate model simulations with respect to ocean dynamics. Oceanologia 53:193-227
Meier HEM, Eilola K, Gustafsson BG, Kuznetsov I, Neumann T, Savchuk OP (2012a) Uncertainty assessment of projected ecological quality indicators in future climate. SMHI Report Oceanografi No112
Meier HEM, Hordoir R, Andersson HC, Dieterich C, Eilola K, Gustafsson BG, Höglund A, Schimanke S (2012b) Modeling the combined impact of changing climate and changing nutrient loads on the Baltic Sea environment in an ensemble of transient simulations for 1961-2099. Clim Dynam 39:2421-2441
Meier HEM, Müller-Karulis B, Andersson HC, Dieterich C, Eilola K, Gustafsson BG, Höglund A, Hordoir R, Kuznetsov I, Neumann T, Ranjbar Z, Savchuk O P, Schimanke S (2012c) Impact of climate change on ecological quality indicators and biogeochemical fluxes in the Baltic Sea - a multi-model ensemble study. Ambio 41:558-573
Müller M, Cherniawsky J, Foreman M, von Storch J-S (2013) Global map of M2 internal tide and its seasonal variability from high resolution ocean circulation and tide modelling. Geophys Res Lett 39:L19607. doi:10.1029/2012GL053320
Nakićenović N, Alcamo J, Davis G et al (2000) Emission scenarios. A special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Neumann T (2010) Climate-change effects on the Baltic Sea ecosystem: A model study. J Mar Syst 81:213-224
Neumann T, Friedland R (2011) Climate change impacts on the Baltic Sea. In: Schernewski G, Hofstede J, Neumann T (eds), Global Change and Baltic Coastal Zones. Springer Science+Business Media (Coastal Research Library 1:23-32)
Neumann T, Eilola K, Gustafsson BG, Müller-Karulis B, Kuznetsov I, Meier HEM, Savchuk OP (2012) Extreme values of temperature, oxygen and blooms in the Baltic Sea in changing climate. Ambio 41:574-585
Nikulin G, Kjellström E, Hansson U, Jones C, Strandberg G, Ullerstig A (2011) Evaluation and future projections of temperature, precipitation and wind extremes over Europe in an ensemble of regional climate simulations. Tellus A 63:41-55
Pickering MD, Wells NC, Horsburgh KJ, Green JAM (2012) The impact of future sea-level rise on the European Shelf tides. Cont Shelf Res, 35:1-15
Pruszak Z, Zawadzka E (2005) Vulnerability of Poland’s coast to sea level rise. Coast Eng J 47:131-155
Pruszak Z, Zawadzka E (2009) Potential implications of sea-level rise for Poland. J Coat Res 24:410-422
Räisänen J, Hansson U, Ullerstig A, Döscher R, Graham LP, Jones C, Meier HEM, Samuelsson P, Willén U (2004) European climate in the late 21st century: Regional simulations with two driving global models and two forcing scenarios. Clim Dynam 22:13-31
Tinz B (1996) On the relation between annual maximum extent of ice cover in the Baltic Sea and sea level pressure as well as air temperature field. Geophysica 32:319-341
Weisse R, Günther H (2007) Wave climate and long-term changes for the Southern North Sea obtained from a high-resolution hindcast 1958–2002. Ocean Dynam 57:161-172
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meier, H.E.M. (2015). Projected Change—Marine Physics. In: The BACC II Author Team, . (eds) Second Assessment of Climate Change for the Baltic Sea Basin. Regional Climate Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16006-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16006-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16005-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16006-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)