Abstract
Digital badges, as emerging trend in education technology, present a new means of assessment in the form of granular microcredentials. The problem facing educators is that distributed learning across various domains and contexts is not captured or structured effectively. This chapter will attempt develop a framework for designing digital badge systems to help address this issue. The authors first present a range of related theories that could support the design of digital badges, including enabling learning autonomy and personalization from the self-regulated learning perspective, goal setting, and pertinent motivating factors found in digital games. The culmination of these theories is then presented as a comprehensive framework which, in turn, could possibly lay the foundation for the design and implementation of digital badge systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education?: It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 217–232. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017–1028. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.
Bergamin, P. B., Werlen, E., Siegenthaler, E., & Ziska, S. (2012). The relationship between flexible and self-regulated learning in open and distance universities. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13(2), 101–123.
Cheung, E. (2004). Goal setting as motivational tool in student’s self-regulated learning. Educational Research Quarterly, 27(3), 3–9.
Dickey, M. D. (2005). Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 67–83.
Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of leaning and the theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Gamrat, C., Zimmerman, H. T., Dudek, J., & Peck, K. (2014). Personalized workplace learning: An exploratory study on digital badging within a teacher professional development program: Digital badging as teacher professional development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12200.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8), 1–7.
Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction III: Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
Moon, M.-K., Jahng, S.-G., & Kim, T.-Y. (2011). A computer-assisted learning model based on the digital game exponential reward system. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(1), 1–14.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Cambridge, MA: B.F. Skinner Foundation.
Thorndike, E. L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York, NY: A. G. Seiler.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wills, C., Xie, Y. (2016). Toward a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework for Designing Digital Badges. In: Ifenthaler, D., Bellin-Mularski, N., Mah, DK. (eds) Foundation of Digital Badges and Micro-Credentials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15424-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15425-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)