Skip to main content

Toward a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework for Designing Digital Badges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foundation of Digital Badges and Micro-Credentials

Abstract

Digital badges, as emerging trend in education technology, present a new means of assessment in the form of granular microcredentials. The problem facing educators is that distributed learning across various domains and contexts is not captured or structured effectively. This chapter will attempt develop a framework for designing digital badge systems to help address this issue. The authors first present a range of related theories that could support the design of digital badges, including enabling learning autonomy and personalization from the self-regulated learning perspective, goal setting, and pertinent motivating factors found in digital games. The culmination of these theories is then presented as a comprehensive framework which, in turn, could possibly lay the foundation for the design and implementation of digital badge systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education?: It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 217–232. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017–1028. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergamin, P. B., Werlen, E., Siegenthaler, E., & Ziska, S. (2012). The relationship between flexible and self-regulated learning in open and distance universities. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13(2), 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, E. (2004). Goal setting as motivational tool in student’s self-regulated learning. Educational Research Quarterly, 27(3), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, M. D. (2005). Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(2), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of leaning and the theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamrat, C., Zimmerman, H. T., Dudek, J., & Peck, K. (2014). Personalized workplace learning: An exploratory study on digital badging within a teacher professional development program: Digital badging as teacher professional development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction III: Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M.-K., Jahng, S.-G., & Kim, T.-Y. (2011). A computer-assisted learning model based on the digital game exponential reward system. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Cambridge, MA: B.F. Skinner Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1905). The elements of psychology. New York, NY: A. G. Seiler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron Wills .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wills, C., Xie, Y. (2016). Toward a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework for Designing Digital Badges. In: Ifenthaler, D., Bellin-Mularski, N., Mah, DK. (eds) Foundation of Digital Badges and Micro-Credentials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15424-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15425-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics