Skip to main content

The English Tenses, Blanché and the Logical Kite

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Road to Universal Logic

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

Abstract

There exists a very systematic limitation on natural compositional concept formation in natural language whose full complexity has not been laid bare. The first section of this chapter will revisit the lexical domains of logical constants, where conceptual ‘‘kinship and contrast’’ define a pattern of opposition first represented in the form of a kite in Seuren and Jaspers (2014). Next, I propose a kite analysis for the system of English finite tenses which has a partial precursor in a now-forgotten little article by Robert Blanché on the one hand and in the much more detailed system of binary temporal relations proposed by Vikner (1985) on the other. From the former the kite structure for the finite tenses differs in that it focuses on the inviolability of prior binary divisions for later ones – which is the operation in this realm of progressive universe restriction (PUR) as defined in Seuren and Jaspers (2014) – and on resulting asymmetries in the tense system; from the latter it differs in proposing a system of two pairs of binary oppositions, a temporal pair and an aspectual pair, yielding four binary relations in all (rather than three), with a surprising similarity between the internal architecture of the temporal and the aspectual pair of relations. On the whole, the pattern suggests that basic conceptual oppositions and lexicalization principles are guided by innate linguistic patterns of which binarity, opposition, and asymmetry are the central properties. If correct, the analysis proposed is striking confirmation in yet another semantic domain of the asymmetry approach to the square of opposition and its extensions of our earlier work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The matter of quantifier readings in the protasis is complex, as there are many other types than future (predictive) conditionals, cf. [2].

  2. 2.

    The term prototypical is used to remind us (i) that time is often indicated by means of other words than tensed verbs (‘‘yesterday,’’ ‘‘at five,’’ ‘‘week,’’ etc.) and (ii) that tenses can be used for non-temporal purposes (‘‘Could you do me a favor?’’: use of the past tense to make the utterance sound more polite).

References

  1. Note sur les relations d’ordre. Rev. Philos. 4, 431–433 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbott, B.: Part V. Back to Grice: Conditionals in English and FOPL. In: Shu, D., Turner, K. (eds.) Contrasting Meanings in Languages of the East and West. Peter Lang, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blanché, R.: Quantity, modality, and other kindred systems of categories. Mind 61(243), 369–375 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanché, R.: Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria 19, 89–130 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanché, R.: Structures intellectuelles. Essai sur l’organisation systématique des concepts. Vrin, Paris (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Declerck, R.: The Grammar of the English Tense System: A Comprehensive Analysis. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoeksema, J.: Blocking effects and polar sensitivity. In: JFAK. Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday. Vossiuspers/Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horn, L.: On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horn, L.: A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horn, L.: Hamburgers and truth: Why Gricean inference is Gricean. Berkeley Linguist. Soc. 16, 454–471 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horn, L.R.: Histoire d’*o: Lexical pragmatics and the geometry of opposition. In: Béziau, J.-Y., Payette, G. (eds.) The Square of Opposition: A General Framework for Cognition, pp. 393–426. Lang, Bern (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacoby, P. A triangle of opposition in Aristotelian logic. New Scholast. 24, 32–56 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaspers, D.: Operators in the Lexicon – On the Negative Logic of Natural Language. LOT Dissertation Series 117, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics / LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics, Utrecht (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jaspers, D.: The language of science and the science of language: On natural words and nonnatural terminology. In: Jaspers, D., Vermoortel, P. (eds.) Business and Language – Essays in Honour of Wilfried Janssens, pp. 567–594. Peeters Publishers, Leuven (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jaspers, D.: Logic of colours in historical perspective. HUB Res. Pap. 3 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jaspers, D.: Logic and colour. Log. Univers. 6(1–2), 227–248 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Sesmat, A.: Logique – II. Les raisonnements, la logistique. Hermann, Paris (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seuren, P.: The logic of thinking. Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, Mededelingen van de afdeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks 65(9) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seuren, P.: The natural logic of language and cognition. Pragmatics 16(1), 103–138 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seuren, P.: Language From Within, vol. 2. The logic of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seuren, P., Jaspers, D.: Logico-cognitive structure in the lexicon. Language 90(3), 607–643 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smessaert, H.: On the 3d visualisation of logical relations. Log. Univers. 3, 303–332 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Vikner, S.: Reichenbach revisited: One, two or three temporal relations? Acta Linguist. Hafniensia 19, 81–95 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Von Wright, G.: An Essay in Modal Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1951)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Thanks to Koen Roelandt of KU Leuven campus Brussels for crucial help with the tense figures. I dedicate this contribution to Jean-Yves Béziau, whose organizational skills and foresight about the relevance of Square studies for logic, philosophy and linguistics have done much to create a vibrant Square studies community. I hope this chapter adequately testifies to my gratitude and respect. Ad multos annos!

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dany Jaspers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

To Jean-Yves Béziau

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaspers, D. (2015). The English Tenses, Blanché and the Logical Kite. In: Koslow, A., Buchsbaum, A. (eds) The Road to Universal Logic. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15368-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics