Abstract
The databases of patents are considerable, with many authors, as a source of information very valuable within the innovation process. One of the most important methods in patent analysis is based on the citations. The basic concept of patent citation analysis is that there exists a technological linkage between two patents if a patent cites the other. The networks codifying the cited-citing relationship between patents are useful for visualizing the overall status of a given technology and helps the experts in the identification of the technological implications using analysis network techniques. The potential offered by the measuring citations for planning and assessing of policies from Science and Technology is immense. The aim of this paper is to describe the utilities and limitations of the analysis network of patents as well as recent advances.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bacchiocchi E, Montobbio F (2010) International knowledge diffusion and home-bias effect: do USPTO and EPO patent citations tell the same story? Scand J Econ 112(3):441–470
Blondel V, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R et al (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp P10008
Breitzman AF, Narin F (2001) Method and apparatus for choosing a stock portfolio, based on patent indicators. United States Patent 6175824
Cheng YH, Kuan FY, Chuang SC et al (2010) Profitability decided by patent quality? An empirical study of the US semiconductor industry. Scientometrics 82(1):175–183
Cho TS, Shih HY (2011) Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997–2008. Scientometrics 89(3):795–811
Fontana R, Nuvolari A, Verspagen M (2009) Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards. Econ Innov New Technol 18:311–336
Garechana G, Rio-Belver R, Cilleruelo E, Gavilanes-Trapote J (2012) Visualizing the scientific landscape using maps of science. In: Industrial engineering: innovative networks, part 2. Springer, London, pp. 103–112. ISBN: 978-1-4471-2320-0
Hacklin F, Marxt C, Fahrni F (2009) Coevolutionary cycles of convergence: an extrapolation from the ICT industry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76(6):723–736
Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. Rand J Econ 36(1):16–38
Han YJ, Park Y (2006) Patent network analysis of inter-industrial knowledge flows: the case of Korea between traditional and emerging industries. World Patent Inf 28(3):235–247
Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM et al (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev Econ Stat 81(3):511–515
Huang Z, Chen H, Chen ZK et al (2004) International nanotechnology development in 2003: country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. J Nanopart Res 6:325–354
Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (1999) International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Econ Innov New Technol 8:105–136
Jin JH, Park SC, Pyon CU (2011) Finding research trend of convergence technology based on Korean R&D network. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):15159–15171
Kay L, Newman N, Youtie J et al (2012) Patent overlay mapping: visualizing technological distance. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1208.4380
Ko N, Yoon J, Seo W (2014) Analyzing interdisciplinarity of technology fusion using knowledge flows of patents. Expert Syst Appl 41:1955–1963
Kodama F (1986) Japanese innovation in mechatronics technology. Sci Publ Policy 13(1):44–51
Kostoff R, Stump J, Johnson D et al (2006) The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature. J Nanopart Res 8:301–321
Lee H, Kim C, Cho H et al (2009) An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: a case of telecommunication technologies. Expert Syst Appl 36(1):894–908
Lee C, Jeon J, Park Y (2011) Monitoring trends of technological changes based on the dynamic patent lattice: a modified formal concept analysis approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78:690–702
Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L (2012) Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 63(7):1442–1458
Leydesdorff L, Kushnir D, Rafols I (2014) Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC). Scientometrics 98:1583–1599
Meyer M (2000) What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics 49(2):93–123
Nagaoka S (2005) Patent quality, cumulative innovation and market value: evidence from Japanese firm level panel data. IIR working paper, WP#05-06. Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo
Narin F (1994) Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 30(1):147–155
Park H, Yoon J (2014) Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: the case of Korean national R&D. Scientometrics 98:853–890
Podolny JM, Stuart TE, Hannan M (1996) Networks, knowledge and niches: competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Am J Sociol 102(3):659–689
Schoen A (2011) A global map of technology. Paper presented at the IPTS patent Workshop, Seville, Spain, 13–14 June 2012
Small H (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 24(4):265–269
Sung K, Kim T, Kong H (2010) Microscopic approach to evaluating technological convergence using patent citation analysis. In: U-and E-Service, Science and Technology, pp 188–194
Wallace M, Gingras Y, Duhon R (2009) A new approach for detecting scientific specialties from raw cocitation networks. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 60(2):240–246
Wang SJ (2007) Factors to evaluate a patent in addition to citations. Scientometrics 71(3):509–522
Wartburg T, Teichert KR (2005) Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Res Policy 34(10):1591–1607
Yoon J, Kim K (2011) Identifying rapidly evolving technological trends for R&D planning using SAO-based semantic patent networks. Scientometrics 88(1):213–228
Zha X, Chen M (2010) Study on early warning of competitive technical intelligence based on the patent map. J Comput 5(2):274–281
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gavilanes-Trapote, J., Río-Belver, R., Cilleruelo, E., Larruscain, J. (2015). Recent Advances in Patent Analysis Network. In: Cortés, P., Maeso-González, E., Escudero-Santana, A. (eds) Enhancing Synergies in a Collaborative Environment. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14078-0_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14078-0_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14077-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14078-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)