Abstract
This chapter presents a framework for understanding collaboration in any context, at any scale, in order to make conclusions regarding approaches for the design and analysis mass collaboration. This provides a foundation for the introduction of other theories and frameworks that explain how collaboration can scale from small, collocated groups, to large distributed communities like Wikipedia. Key ideas presented include a specific, design-focused definition for collaboration as ‘add, edit, delete rights to a shared pool of content’ and stigmergy (a form of indirect communication common in social insects) as they key means by which collaboration scales online, referred to as ‘stigmergic collaboration’. Stigmergic collaboration also explains how teamwork can emerge, potentially without explicit knowledge of other team members, where productivity is organic and is not managed by any central function. It is my hope that these ideas, along with others presented, will improve the design and analysis of mass collaboration in general, as well as provide new pathways for further research in CSCL and educational contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The theory summarised here was developed and is described more fully in my doctoral thesis, Stigmergic Collaboration: A theoretical framework for mass collaboration (2007). This paper also draws on learning and insight gained from 7 years of industry experience following completion of my PhD. This has involved applying this framework to the design and delivery of mass collaborations focused on the creation of government policy, strategy and urban planning. While all these instances have required considerable strategic community building components, the core logic that stigmergic collaboration underpins scalable collaboration has held true and provided key design insights.
- 2.
Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition, (1989). (Eds.) J. A. Simpson & E. S. C. Weiner. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- 3.
Adapted from Stigmergic Collaboration: A theoretical framework for mass collaboration (Elliott, 2007)
- 4.
- 5.
Garbage dumping as stigmergy is mentioned by Dylan Shell on comment to Joe Gregorio’s (2002) Stigmergy and the World Wide Web. Bitworking (web log): http://bitworking.org/news/Stigmergy, retrieved 20 December 2005
References
Baars, B. (1997). In the theater of consciousness: The workspace of the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Black, L. J., Cresswell, A. M., Luna, L. F., Pardo, T. A., Martinez, I. J., Thompson, F., … Cook, M. (2003). A dynamic theory of collaboration: A structural approach to facilitating intergovernmental use of information technology. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 36, Maui, HI.
Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Fourcassié, V., & Deneubourg, J.-L. (1998). The phase-ordering kinetics of cemetery organization in ants. Physical Review E, 4, 4568–4571.
Brueckner, S. (2000). Return from the ant: Synthetic ecosystems for manufacturing control. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/brueckner-sven-2000-06-21/PDF/Brueckner.pdf
Cress, U. (2013). Mass collaboration and learning. In R. Luckin, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, S. Puntambekar, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook on design in educational technology (pp. 416–425). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
Cress, U., Barron, B., Halatchliyski, I., Oeberst, A., Forte, A., Resnick, M., & Collins, A. (2013). Mass collaboration—An emerging field for CSCL research. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, N. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time and scale (pp. 557–563). Madison, WI: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with Wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105–122.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
Elliott, M. A. (2007). Stigmergic collaboration: A theoretical framework for mass collaboration (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11343/39359
Elliott, M. (May 2006). Stigmergic Collaboration: The Evolution of Group Work. M/C Journal, 9(2). Retrieved 23 Nov. 2015 from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0605/03-elliott.php.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity—Theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (2008). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32.
Gifford, B. R., & Enyedy, N. D. (1999). Activity centered design: Towards a theoretical framework for CSCL. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1150262&dl=ACM&coll=DL&CFID=463054783&CFTOKEN=78842260
Grassé, P.-P. (1959). La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations inter-individuelles chez Bellicositermes Natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d’interprétation du comportement des Termites Constructeurs. Insectes Sociaux, 6, 41–84.
Grassé, P.-P. (1984). Termitologia. Paris, France: Masson.
Green, C. (2001). The third hand: Collaboration in art from conceptualism to postmodernism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Grosz, B. J., & Sarit, K. (1999). The evolution of SharedPlans. In M. Wooldridge & A. R. Dordrecht (Eds.), Foundations of Rational Agency (Applied Logic Series). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Helbing, D., Keltsch, J., & Molnár, P. (1997). Modeling the evolution of human and trail systems. Nature, 388, 47–50.
Helbing, D., Schweitzer, F., Keltsch, J., & Molnár, P. (1997). Active walker model for the formation of human and animal trail systems. Physical Review E, 56, 2527–2539.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 174–196.
Hutchins, E. (2000). Distributed cognition. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford, England: Elsevier Sciences.
Kelly, K. (1994). Out of control: The new biology of machines. London, England: Fourth Estate.
Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R. C., & Shi, Y. (2001). Swarm intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Kramer, R. S. S. (2005). Stigmergic communication: Achieving so much without saying a word. Sussex, England: Author.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 5, 379–393.
Leont’ev, A. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Leont’ev, A. (1981). Problems of the development of mind (English translation). Moscow, Russia: Progress Press.
Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual teams. Toronto, Canada: Wiley.
Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 16, 404–409.
Parunak, H. V. D. (2005). Expert assessment of human-human stigmergy. AnnArbor, MI: Altarum Institute. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a440006.pdf
Reed, D. P. (1999). That sneaky exponential—Beyond Metcalfe’s law to the power of community building. In Context Magazine, n.P. Retrieved from http://www.reed.com/dpr/,last:10.5.2012
Ricci, A., Omicini, A., Viroli, M., Gardelli, L., & Oliva, E. (2006). Cognitive stigmergy: A framework based on agents and artifacts. In The Third International Workshop on Environments for Multiagent Systems.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Star, L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Distributed Artificial Intelligence, 2, 37–54.
Star, L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Susi, T., & Ziemke, T. (2001). Social cognition, artefacts, and stigmergy: A comparative analysis of theoretical frameworks for the understanding of artefact-mediated collaborative activity. Cognitive Systems Research, 2, 273–290.
Suthers, D. (2005). Technology affordances for intersubjective learning: A thematic agenda for CSCL. Paper presented at the International Conference of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan.
Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (1999). A brief history of stigmergy. Artificial Life, 5, 97–116.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher order psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 5, 421–445.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139–162.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elliott, M. (2016). Stigmergic Collaboration: A Framework for Understanding and Designing Mass Collaboration. In: Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., Jeong, H. (eds) Mass Collaboration and Education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13535-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13536-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)